Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Weather Magic

I found this article on a Pagan site and thought it illustrates perfectly some of the same issues involved in cloudbusting. The Pagan community generally has a more life-positive attitude and greater respect for natural processes than the mainstream culture and weatherworking is a tradition of theirs, so despite the vast differences in theory and practice between "weather magic" and cloudbusting, I consider the issues raised to be the same.
Joel Carlinsky

Weather Magic - Witchvox Article


Weather Magic    

Author: Chirotus Infinitum
Posted: January 11th. 2009
Times Viewed: 2,662


Weather Magic - Witchvox Article



Copyright: Copyright 2008 Chirotus Infinitum
No reproduction without permission from the author.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Orgonomic Ecology Message Posted On Discussion Board Of Orgonomic Journal

I recently posted a message on the discussion board of an orgonomic journal, the Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy, in response to a posting there advocating gun control.

Discussion Board | Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy


This message is posted on the discussion board, after being approved by the moderator, an M. D. who is a medical orgonomist and a board-certified psychiatrist. .



If you are against easy access to guns, what about cheap, easy access to cloudbusters? There are several websites selling cloudbusters or giving exact instructions on how to build one, and several hundred people on every continent have already done so.

I once spoke to Dr. Victor Sobey about this issue. He told me that when Reich invented the cloudbuster, in 1952, Sobey had been the only one to urge him not to publish because of the risk of misuse. Reich published anyway, but when I spoke to him, Sobey still felt he had been right and Reich should have kept his mouth shut.

Now, after many severe storms and floods have been caused by incompetent, irresponsible playing with cloudbusters, including the recent catastrophic floods in Queensland, Australia, it is becoming more and more obvious Sobey was right. We badly need a few people speaking up and demanding transparency and accountability in the use of the cloudbuster.

I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, and received tutoring from her in the field of orgone biophysics, including the use of the Reich cloudbuster. I also have long been active in the environmental movement, and it is from that perspective that I am conducting a campaign against atmosphere abusers who are engaging in cloudbuster malpractice.

Under normal conditions, the cloudbuster should only be used rarely, when there is an atmospheric problem such as a prolonged drought, to restore things to normal. Today, thanks mainly to the use of radioactivity in industry and warfare, the atmosphere is increasingly out of order and the cloudbuster is needed more than at any time in history.

Unfortunately, thanks in large part to the internet, many irresponsible people, not knowing much about cloudbusting and the proper use of it to restore natural, self-regulating conditions to a damaged atmosphere, are promoting it as a form of “weather control”, which is a form of malpractice that places the lives of innocent members of the public at risk.

In fact, this misuse of this device is a form of atmosphere abuse, comparable to abuse of children or animals, and causes further damage to the already damaged atmosphere, making restoration of natural self-regulation more difficult.

The indiscriminate proliferation of cloudbusters in the hands of “weather control” hobbyists is shaping up to be a major environmental problem and whole ecosystems are threatened by people playing around with the weather from their backyards.

Many of these people have good intentions, but effecively zero knowledge of orgonomy. Others are motivated by irrational needs for power and a sense of control. The input of people coming from a background in the psychiatric side of orgonomy is sorely needed to help bring some semblence of rationality to the field.

I have a blog, http://www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com/ on the issue and I urge you to take a good look at some of the articles I have posted there. Then, if you are interested, I have a discussion list, the Orgonomic Ecology list, and you would be welcome to sign up for it
at OrgonomicEcology-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk .

Joel Carlinsky
( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich


Thursday, May 5, 2011

Letter From Germany

I am not the only one raising cautions about growing number of people who want to take up cloudbusting. Jurgen Fischer, of Germany, who has long experience in the field, sent me a copy of a letter he recently sent  to a correspondent in Greece who had asked about how to build a cloudbuster to relieve dry weather there.  I am posting it here in a computer-generated translation into English, followed by the original German.
Joel Carlinsky

( ENGLISH TRANSLATION )
Dear Mr. M.,Your request is so understandable, I would strongly advise you, however, by Their plan in sight. I can not write any treatise 
 Reasons in brief:- Irrigation wells, agriculture, etc. but no ecological an economic application.- Cloudbusting is a serious intervention in the ecosystem. The Cloudbusting like Reich has operated it had (with one exception toDemonstration purposes) does not make sense to make the desert to rain orIrrigate but to support self-regulation of the atmosphere and thus to strengthen the soil and the natural flora and fauna.

- Economic Cloudbusting (ie irrigation, etc.) is carried out by the jet stream is deflected. Thus, the global weather is changing.-With this type of Cloudbusting e.g. date for several years Village in the Algerian desert irrigation. The impact of this Project led to the extremely hot summer months in Europe and especially Russia in Asia in 2010 there where much of the harvest, and thousands Hectares of forest were destroyed. The Himalayan glaciers are melting much faster and resulted in the largest flood in Bangladesh 10.000den dead and millions Flüchtilingen.


- Similar effects had a Cloudbustingaktion in Germany 1991,where I was involved. It was then the largest known to date Storm series in Europe, where about 200 people were killed and many Billion in economic losses. The extreme fires and Floods in Australia in the winter 2010/2011 are directly Connection with Coudbusting. All these relationships are not provable,are, however, in areas of high probability.


The disaster in Europe1991 is seen by the Reichian Cloudbustingexperten Sun After all This campaign is denied in all reports, ie hushed and still acted as economic Cloudbusting was technically feasible. I consider this option, "Rain in the Desert" to make, for criminal because it conjures up disasters with which Chernobyl and Fukushima are comparable and are denied by obvious reasons, if they do not fit into the desired image of the omnipotent maker.

- The technical equipment for Cloudbusting is not the problem. The Devices are simple and relatively cheap to produce (by 5000 -?). TheProblem lies in the character structure of the operators. First,comprehensive knowledge of energetic relationships and second, the direct Perception of the effects needed. Third, it is necessary to have one Sense of responsibility for it to enrich themselves personally do not mind (Rain make for their own economic interests, the ego: "I can Make rain, "etc.). Fourth, you have to be trained, of course, with the Cloud Buster work specifically to what a corresponding practical and theoretical knowledge requires. There are but fewPeople who have the necessary technical and ecological knowledge and according to healthy character structure (I guess less than 10worldwide).


- The application of cloudbusters is extremely dangerous to health. WilhelmReich died from it (three heart attacks in direct sequence). His Cloudbusting engineer Robert McCullough of them for life on one side been paralyzed. Eva Reich had about life serious health Problems. I myself have suffered a heart like this damage. The health effects are similar to those used in the Exposure to radioactive emissions are high.

 
I hope I was able to raise your awareness of the problem with these lines.All the best 

 Jürgen Fischer

( THE ORIGINAL GERMAN VERSION FOLLOWS )


Sehr geehrter Herr M.,

so verständlich Ihre Bitte ist, möchte ich Ihnen jedoch dringend raten, von
Ihrem Vorhaben abzusehen. Ich kann hier keine Abhandlung schreiben, die
wichtigsten Gründe in Kürze:

- Bewässerung für Brunnen, Landwirtschaft etc. ist keine ökologische sondern
eine ökonomische Anwendung.

- Cloudbusting ist ein schwerwiegender Eingriff in das Ökosystem. Das
Cloudbusting wie Reich es betrieben hat, hatte (bis auf eine Ausnahme zu
Demonstrationszwecken) nicht den Sinn, Regen zu machen oder die Wüste zu
bewässern, sondern die Selbstregulation der Atmosphäre zu unterstützen und
damit auch den Boden und die natürliche Flora und Fauna zu stärken.

- Ökonomisches Cloudbusting (also Bewässerung etc.) wird durchgeführt, indem
der Jetstream abgelenkt wird. Damit wird das globale Wetter verändert.

-Mit dieser Art des Cloudbusting wird z.B. aktuell seit einigen Jahren ein
Dorf in der algerischen Wüste künstlich bewässert. Die Auswirkungen dieses
Projekts führten zu den extrem heißen Sommermonaten in Europa und vor allem
im asiatischen Russland 2010 wobei dort ein Großteil der Ernte und tausende
Hektar Wald vernichtet wurden. Die Gletscher im Himalaya schmolzen viel
schneller ab und führten zur größten Überschwemmung in Bangladesh mit
10.000den Toten und Millionen Flüchtilingen.

- Ähnliche Auswirkungen hatte eine Cloudbustingaktion in Deutschland 1991,
bei der ich beteiligt war. Damals kam es zur größten bis dahin bekannten
Sturmserie in Europa, bei der etwa 200 Menschen getötet wurden und viele
Milliarden Schäden verursacht wurden. Die extremem Brände und
Überschwemmungen in Australien im Winter 2010/2011 stehen in direktem
Zusammenhang mit Coudbusting. All diese Zusammenhänge sind nicht beweisbar,
liegen jedoch im Bereich hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit. Die Katastrophe in Europa
1991 wird auch von den reich'schen Cloudbustingexperten so gesehen. Immerhin
wird diese Aktion in allen Berichten geleugnet, d.h. totgeschwiegen und
weiterhin so getan, als sei ökonomisches Cloudbusting technisch machbar. Ich
halte diese Einstellung, "Regen in der Wüste" zu machen,  für kriminell,
weil sie Katastrophen heraufbeschwört, die mit denen von Tschernobyl und
Fukushima vergleichbar sind und aus durchsichtigen Gründen verleugnet werden, wenn sie nicht ins gewünschte Bild des omnipotenten Machers passen.

- Das technische Equipment für Cloudbusting ist nicht das Problem. Die
Geräte sind einfach und relativ billig herzustellen (um 5000,- ?). Das
Problem liegt in der Charakterstruktur der Betreiber. Erstens ist
umfassendes Wissen über energetische Zusammenhänge und zweitens die direkte
Wahrnehmungsfähigkeit der Wirkungen nötig. Drittens ist es nötig, ein
Bewusstsein dafür zu entwickeln, sich nicht persönlich daran zu bereichern
(Regen für eigene ökonomische Interessen herzustellen, das Ego: "ICH kann
Regen machen," etc.). Viertens muss man natürlich darin geschult sein, mit
dem Cloudbuster gezielt arbeiten zu können, was eine entsprechendes
praktisches und theoretisches Wissen voraussetzt.  Es gibt aber nur wenige
Menschen, die das nötige technisch-ökologische Wissen haben und eine
entsprechend gesunde Charakterstruktur (ich schätze weniger als 10
weltweit).

- Die Anwendung von Cloudbustern ist extrem gesundheitsgefährlich. Wilhelm
Reich ist daran gestorben (drei Herzinfarkte in direkter Folge). Sein
Cloudbusting-Techniker Robert McCullough ist davon lebenslang halbseitig
gelähmt worden. Eva Reich hatte darüber lebenslang schwere gesundheitliche
Probleme. Ich selber habe davon einen Herzschaden erlitten. Die
gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen sind mit denen vergleichbar, die bei der
Exposition mit hohen radioaktiven Emissionen entstehen.

Ich hoffe, ich konnte mit diesen Zeilen Ihr Problembewusstsein wecken.

Alles Gute
Jürgen Fischer







Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Tornado Record Set

WASHINGTON – Preliminary government estimates say there were more tornadoes in a single day last week than any other day in U.S. history.
Government analysts said Monday there were 362 tornadoes during last week's outbreak, including a record-setting 312 in one 24-hour period.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the largest previous number on record in one event occurred from April 3-4, 1974, with 148 tornadoes.
NOAA says 340 people were killed during the 24-hour-period from 8:00 a.m. Wednesday to Thursday.
It was the deadliest single day for tornadoes since the March 18, 1925, tornado outbreak that had 747 fatalities across 7 states.

********************************************************************************************************

This exceeds the former record set in 1974 that was triggered by a cloudbuster located in Montague, Massachustts. This new record was caused by the reaction of the atmosphere to the intense oranur excitation from the nuclear meltdown in Japan. The response of the atmosphere to nuclear irritation is to develop a strong circulatory motion and discharge the excess energy as a motor force. Such attempts at self-healing by the wounded atmosphere will probably continue for a long time to come, until the radioactive contamination has been metaboolized by the atmosphere and reduced to managable levels.

But with tornadoes getting so much bad press lately, we can expect some misguided individuals who know how to build a cloudbuster from irresponsible internet postings but do not understand the basic theory behind the cloudbuster, to think they should try to prevent these "destructive" tornadoes.

 If some such well-intentioned but uninformed person, not knowing the vital role of tornadoes in re-mobilizing stagnated energy that has become immobilized by exposure to radioactivity, were to attempt to prevent tornado formation, and were to by some unlikely chance, succeed at it, and if the project were to continue for any significant length of time, the results could be a long-lasting drought, and if the project went on long enough, the permanent desertification of the area involved.

For this reason, I consider it important to keep presenting the facts about the need for tornadoes in maintaining the functioning of the atmosphere, especially in these times when it is under attack by nuclear power. There was a time when forest fires were regarded as a problem to be stamped out at every turn, but today the need for forest fires in keeping an ecosystem in balance is well-known.
 Oregon Wild's Fire Policy Statement

Likewise, for a long time, sharks were considered something the oceans would be a better place without, but today, active shark-protection groups are advocating that these top-of-the-food-chain predators be protected because they are vital to the health of oceanic ecosystems. Shark Angels

The protection of the natural functions of the atmosphere is equally important and there is a need for strong advocacy in favor of allowing the atmosphere to regulate itself and not be interfered with by well-meant, but ecologically unsophisticated cloudbusting ventures designed to prevent tornadoes.
Joel Carlinsky

Blog Archive