Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, April 29, 2011

Reply To A Weather Ranger

                                                        Reply To A Weather Ranger
                                                                 by Joel Carlinsky
From: david wells <davidwells3@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Good Severe Weather?
To: "joel carlinsky" <joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, April 29, 2011, 2:24 PM

Joel Carlinsky , We were approaching new moon phase when the storms hit the areas . The moon is as close to the earth as it ever gets now . When new moon occurs , the sun and the moon gravity both combine to increase the waves from Sedona , Arizona . At the times of the tornadoes , alignment to the Sedona vortex and moon occurs . The Mapleton Iowa tornado also lined up .
     If the wave from Sedona to the moon passes through a thunderstorm , a tornado is likely to form .
     We are in for some really wild weather this year because of the close moon .
     Do you still think it is OK for 284 people to die from something that could have been prevented ?
    David Wells




From:
To: "david wells" <davidwells3@gmail.com>
Subject Good Severe Weather?

I have never denied that astronomical factors are involved in weather. They certainly are. In fact, the hurricanes you want to sabotage are formed by the vast streams of orgone energy that flow in from space and impinge upon the earth. These streams superimpose and merge, and in the process, create hurricanes.

These hurricanes will happen regardless of there is DOR or not, but in going through their life-cycle, they remove large amounts of DOR in the process.  They are the most important of the several mechanisms by which the earth cleans out the DOR accumulation from the atmosphere each year, and without them the earth would soon become uninhabitable.

 But in addition to these astronomical influences, there are a number of more localized influences, and one of the most important of those is the nuclear technology that has developed on this planet over the past several decades. The orgone field of the earth is being constantly excited by the presence of nuclear reactors and nuclear bombs and other anthropogenic sources of secondary radiation, including any high-voltage alternating current devices.

The atmospheric orgone energy reacts to this irritation by a strong storm, with high winds, lightning discharges, and circulating motion, in other words, a thunderstorm / tornado. This motion restores the field to life. If there is no such reaction, or if it is not strong enough, the local portion of the field "dies" and lapses into DOR, a stagnant state in which it is toxic to life and unable to perform it's natural function of pulsation which is what produces rain in the contraction phase of the cycle. So if there is too much DOR around, there will be a drought.

So to avoid a drought, which if it lasts long enough, becomes desertification, either there must be storms and tornadoes to re-mobilize the stuck atmospheric energy, or cloudbusting operations to remove DOR must be done.

When the build-up of DOR becomes too great, there will be tornadoes as a reaction and they will reduce the amount of DOR to below the threshold required to trigger a tornado. If they do not, there will soon be more tornadoes. If there are not enough tornadoes, the drought will go on until the region becomes a permanent desert.

Cloudbusting operations can be a good thing to do if the operations are done to reduce DOR, thus restoring motility to the atmospheric energy field. In that case, rain will eventually fall as the atmosphere resumes normal pulsation. Or cloudbusting could be a bad thing to do, if it drains off just enough of the excess excitation to prevent tornado formation, but not enough to allow normal pulsation to recover. In that case, there will be a drought that may go on until the area has become a desert.

So the answer to your question, " Do you still think it is OK for 284 people to die from something that could have been prevented ? ", is, I think obstructing tornado formation which is needed for DOR-removal is vandalizing the atmosphere and increasing the tendency to droughts and possibly long-term desertification. A tornado may be more dramatic, but actually does far less damage than a long, possibly permanent, drought would do.

There is another factor to consider here too. DOR does not only affect the atmosphere. It is toxic to biological processes. DOR-sickness is another effect of high concentrations of DOR in an area. All biological processes are affected negatively by high levels of DOR.

So the answer to your question should also take into account how many thousands would die from cancer, heart attacks, flu epidemics and other infections brought on by reduced immune function caused by DOR, accidents due to DOR-induced misjudgements, suicide from depression intensified by DOR, homicide by people driven into a rage by DOR, and countless other symptoms of DOR-sickness.

And the question then is: How many cases of DOR-sickness, many of them fatal, are you willing to cause by sabotage of vitally-needed tornadoes that we need to clean out DOR from the atmosphere and keep the earth healthy and habitable?

The orgone theory is not a explanation thought up Post Facto to "explain how the cloudbuster works". It is a very robust theory that was worked out step by step, in great detail, over many years before the cloudbuster was invented. It was tested and proven at every step of the way.

And the cloudbuster was not "stumbled upon" by accident, and then an "explanation" of how it worked needed to explain it. It was the result of consistant following up on one fact after another, each new finding proving the vailidity of the previous findings and leading logically on to the next. The value of a scientific theory is it's ability to predict, and the orgone theory PREDICTS the cloudbuster-effect.

Instead of citing pseudo-scientific, pseudo-orgonomic ideas of Trevor Constable, who is NOT an authority in orgonomy, as you did in one of your previous e-mails to me, I suggest you familiarize yourself with the rather large body of orgonomic literature.

Two good references to start with are:
( 1 ) The Emotional Desert: The Medical DOR-buster: Part One. Included in Selected Writings, by Wilhelm Reich.
( 2 ) DOR Sickness: A Review of Reich's Findings, by Chester Raphael.
Both these sources are available from the Wilhelm Reich Museum and can be ordered via their website.

Joel Carlinsky

Blog Archive