Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.


In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.

In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.

The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.

About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, April 15, 2011

Cloudbusting In Montana

                                 Cloudbusting In The Northern Plains
                                                 By Joel Carlinsky

An experiment is underway in Montana. It has been going on for some 20 years now, and nobody is even noticing. It was not intended as an experiment, but it is one, nevertheless, for nobody knows what the long-term results might be.

Every summer for the past 20 years, a California-based New-Age shaman named Matt Ryan has driven from his home at Mt. Shasta to Montana, towing a small trailer behind his car. On the trailer is a cloudbuster, a type of device invented by Wilhelm Reich. The cloudbuster has, as one of it´s functions, the ability to alter the weather over a considerable area.

In Montana, a group of farmers pay Matt Ryan $10,000 each summer to make rain for them. And every summer, the rain comes at his command. The farmers are satisfied with his services and he is content with the $10,000 and does not seek additional business. He has little desire for publicity.

Matt Ryan is a former member of the Bear Tribe Medicine Society, a New-Age type organization of mostly white followers of the late Sun Bear, a Chippewa medicine man who won many white converts to his New-Age version of Native American religion. Today, he works as a public-relations agent for a New-Age guru at Mt. Shasta. And every summer he travels to Montana to make rain for farmers who pay for his services.

The cloudbuster is a deceptively simple device. It is easy to construct one. The hard part is in knowing how to use it. Of the many people who have built cloudbusters and used them, most have failed miserably. Many have caused serious floods, killing many people in the process. Many others have given up, unable to obtain convincing results.

Matt Ryan is one of the very few who do know what they are doing in this field. He was one of the students of the late Jerome Eden, who taught a course in cloudbusting in Northern Idaho in the 1980s. This course, the only formally organized course ever taught on this subject, was a very good one and Jerome Eden was a consumate instructor, well qualified to teach it and exacting in his standards.

So there is nothing surprising in the fact that while most of the people who attempt cloudbusting  unintentionally cause disasters, Matt Ryan has never, as far as I know, been responsible for any catastrophic weather events as side-effects of his rainmaking operations.

But there is another standard that can also be applied to cloudbusting operations, and that standard is that no operation should be done unless there is a need for it. The proper application of a cloudbuster is to bring back normal rainfall, not to increase rainfall over and above normal. Cloudbusting is intended as a form of medical practice, with the atmosphere as the patient. It is really "atmospheric medicine", not a mere form of "weather engineering", as some misguided people persist in regarding it. And using a cloudbuster to change the weather from what is normal for the area in the absence of a DOR problem, and from what is sufficient for the native, non-desert ecosystem, is malpractice.

 A desert is a location that suffers from a stagnation or blockage known in the cloudbusting field as DOR, that impedes movement of moisture into the area and inhibits rainfall. If this DOR condition is temporary, it is called a drought. If it persists over years, the region is called a desert. In either case, a cloudbuster can be properly employed to remove the stagnation that is preventing the normal rains.

But the plains of Montana are not a desert region. The year-long average of rainfall is enough for the growth of a spectacular verdant carpet of native prairre grasses and other vegetation, a lush native grassland, in fact, that before the introduction of farming in the mid-19th century, supported an impressive asemblage of wildlife, including bison, elk, pronghorn antelope, and the wolves, grizzlies, Indians, and other predators who fed on them. It has been called an American Serengetti, and was the richest, most biodiverse grassland ecosystem on Earth.

The tough native vegetation, adapted to the prevailing climate by thousands of years of adaptation, is now reduced to a few scattered patches of native grass, scattered among a vast cultivated field. The native wildlife has suffered a similar decline, with many forms on the verge of extinction.

The climate of the area is not really suited for farming, and the area should never have been plowed up and turned into farms, but it is still not too late to repair the damage done by several generations of farmers and get things back to normal. Several serious proposals have been made by conservation biologists for restoration of the Great Plains, or at least a major part of the Great Plains, to their natural condition. These proposals for what is known in the field of conservation biology as Restoration Ecology, include the extirpation of non-native plants and the re-planting of native grasses and other species better adapted to the prevailing climatic conditions.

Since the native species of plants were already adapted to the prevailing climate and able to cope with the dry summers, there is really no need to change the climate merely to accommodate farmers and their introduced crops. If farming cannot be successful there without a change of climate, farming is probably not the optimum use for the Great Plains.

The Northern Great Plains is not a desert region, does not suffer from lack of water, and does not need any extra rainfall. Unless a region is infested by DOR or normal weather fronts are being blocked by a DOR-barrier, there is no justification for cloudbusting to increase rainfall in an area where there is a rich native biota adapted to the prevailing climate.

So, even though there has never yet been a flood or other weather-related disaster directly caused by the yearly cloudbusting expeditions of Matt Ryan, the cumulative effect of his more than 20 years of annual increase of rainfall over and above what would fall there naturally, is likely to have had an effect on the balance of native vegetation compared to intrusive species brought in by the farmers from farther east, where the climate is naturally more moist. The conditions that favor farmers and their crops are not the best climate conditions for the plants that grew there for the thousands of years before the arrival of the farmers.

Before any long-term cloudbusting project is undertaken, an ecologist should be involved as a vital part of the team in the planning stages. A botanical census should be done, counting the number of different species of plants in a few selected representative sample acres. This count should be regarded as a baseline, and should be repèated at intervals throughout the life of the project. That way you would know if you are having a bad effect on biodiversity or not. Otherwise, you might be driving numerous native species closer to extinction without any way of knowing it.

Such precautions are actually the usual standard requirement these days for almost any type of project that could affect the environment. But in the 1980s, when Jerome Eden was teaching his course in cloudbusting, this sort of preparation was not so well-known and apparently Matt Ryan has not kept up to date with his education on what should be the proper and responsible practice in the field of cloudbusting.


Restoration ecology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Blog Archive