Thank you, ...........,
. Since I notice you sent a copy of your letter to Ash, I expect that by now you have received his slanders and defamation of me. So, before you make up your mind on anything, I invite you to check out my blog, www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com and read through the articles I have posted there to get some perspective on the matter.
After that, you are welcome to join my Yahoo groups mailing list, which Ash is trying to get Yahoo to censor.
To make one thing clear: I am not against all cloudbusting. In the current situation, with the atmosphere under assault from a vast, planet-wide nuclear technology, we need cloudbusting because it is the only way to heal the life energy field of the earth from the damage radioactivity is doing to it. A properly done cloudbusting project would have my full support.
But a properly done project would be designed to heal the damaged atmosphere, not to "control the weather", or to "make rain in a drought", both of which ideas show a total misunderstanding of the fuction of a cloudbuster. Control of weather by cloudsbusting is certainly possible, but is almost always undersirable.
Anyone who wishes to use a cloudbuster to impose human dictatorship upon the atmosphere is simply revealing his power-freak tendencies. Cloudbusting should be seen as a form of medical practice, with the atmosphere as the patient. If the patient is sick, and needs help, you help it. If it is not sick, and is functioning normally, in a healthy way, you leave it alone.
A cloudbuster is very simple to build, and there are unfortunately plenty of websites telling every Tom, Dick, and Harry how to build one, but there is virtually nothing on-line about how to use it properly. And there is a good reason for that. Most people in this culture are authoritarian personalities when it comes to dealing with nature or non-human species. So when they find out about cloudbusting, they misunderstand it as a way to "control weather" and impose their own will on the natural world.
It is true that when he first discovered the effect, Reich did use the term, "engineering" to describe it, but by the end of his life, he had evolved a concept of "atmospheric mediocine", and wrote about the difference between a "dictator and a guide" in setting forth instructions on how to properly use a cloudbuster. Anyone now who refers to cloudbusting as "engineering" is guilty of malpractice.
Imposing human domination on an already sick atmosphere is abuse in the same way beating a sick horse to make it run is abusive. It can be made to do what you want it to do, up to the point where you kill it by such abuse, but only a psychopath would do it.
The first and most important thing to learn about cloudbusting is not how to do cloudbusting. It is how NOT to do cloudbusting. The common errors to avoid. The mistakes to not make. After you have learned what NOT to do, you are then ready to start to learn how to do cloudbusting.
So what I do, is try to use bad examples like Ash to illustrate what NOT to do, so others will not make the same mistakes.
So, again, if you are interested in helping my campaign against authoritarian misuse of the cloudbuster by people who want to "control the weather", please join my list. And feel free to write to me anytime if you have any questions.
( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )
--- On Sun, 3/13/11, E............ wrote:
To: "joel carlinsky" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sunday, March 13, 2011, 11:23 PM
This is .....................
You have my full support in this as I do not believe irresponsible abuse of our ecosystem should be tolerated.
It is our responsibility as those who know to shepherd the technology we support with integrity and respect.