Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.


In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.

In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.

The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.

About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Saturday, November 20, 2010

A Letter To Another Weather Ranger

Dear Mr. Feliciano,

Thank you for finally deciding to write to me. It is about time.
 I appologize for perhaps being a bit too agressive at first contact, but please understand that I was reacting to the slanders and personal attacks of Ash Palise. He had posted a request for volunteers to the orgonomy mailing list, but would not say what the project was that he wanted them to volunteer for. I correctly guessed what it was and sent that information to the OML, which caused him to start ranting and slandering me. If my introduction to you had been by some other means, I might have been less confrontational.
But none of the other Weather Rangers has called Ash on his bad behavior. So as far as I have any way of knowing, most of you agree with him.
But you yourself have sent to the Weather Rangers website links to defamatory material posted about me on the website of James DeMeo. DeMeo has plenty of motive to slander me and try to discredit me because I have written several articles severely critical of his incompetent cloudbusting work over the years. He has caused a lot of damage and killed a lot of people and I have exposed that, so of course he has reason to try to discredit me.
 It was very ill-advised of you to take his and his friends writings about me at face value instead of checking them out and finding out if he might have a motive to say bad things against me.
And in any case, regardless of my personal character, past actions, or whom I associate with, the issues I have raised of environmental impact of weather operations are valid issues, not dependent on who I am or whatever I may or may not have done 30 years ago or what magazine I may have published an article in, or even if I am sane or not. You did not address any of the issues I raised. What you did was post a link to the personal attacks by DeMeo and his suporters.
I have built many orgone accumulators, orgone blankets, medical DOR-busters, cloudbusters, and other orgone-related equipment over the last 40 years, and having had personal instruction from Dr. Eva Reich, and having a letter from her in which she says she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field", I consider myself qualified to understand how an orgone accumulator works without having to read any books on quantum physics as you suggest, thank you.
And the main issues I have been trying to raise with you and your associates do not concern if your device works or not,or if it does, how it does it. The scientific issues are only of secondary importance. What I have been trying to get across is the issue of damage to the environment. Having worked with several environmental activist groups, I think I am as knowledgeable about ecology as I am about orgonomy, but still, if I was going to undertake a long-term cloudbusting program covering a wide area, I would want to consult an ecologist familiar with that area before deciding to do it or not.
That sort of thing, an Environmental Impact Study, is standard procedure nowadays, and there is no excuse for just going off and doing something that could have a major impact onthe ecosystem without at least making a serious effort to find out what the effects and implications might turn out to be that might not have been anticipated.
Regarding your third point,
"3. You say David Wells' weather machines produce Oranur. Does an
Oranur producer create rain? Placed in the proper Earth magnetic
direction David's machines create rain, and plenty of it. Might not
these machines be Orgone stabilizers rather than the monstrosities you
purport them to be?"
My answer is No, they cannot. An electrical device is still an electrical device, no matter what "circuit" may be involved. It runs on ordinary household electrical current. This kind of current is a secondary form of energy originally drawn from the universal orgone energy ocean surrounding the earth by a Farady generator, and all forms of secondary energy irritate the basic orgone energy without any exceptions. If a device is powered by Faradic current, it will inevitably produce an oranur effect, differing only in intensity from that produced by radioactive materials.
The important thing about any electrical device is that it is electrical. All other things about it are of minor importance compared to that. It is the use of Faradic current, not how a particular circuit is configured, that determines that the device will create an oranur excitation in the orgone around it.
This understanding is fundamental to the orgonomic understanding of how the universe works and is not going to be changed by suggesting I read a book on some other subject by someone who does not understand orgone biophysics. If you want to claim that an electrical device can violate well-established basic fundamental principles of orgone biophysics that have stood up to some 70 years of testing by numerous orgonomicly-oriented scientists, you will need to present a lot of solid evidence, not anecdotal stories by backyard enthusiasts who do not even bother to keep records of what they do.
In my opinion, your device cannot do what you think it can, but contrary to what a mainstream mechanistic physicist would expect, it does do something, and that something is enough to account for your thinking it can do what you think it can. But what it really is doing is damaging to the orgone field of this planet. Any effect it may have on weather is just a side-effect of that damage.
But even if the oranur field generated by the machine was not a factor, and the weather effects were what you say they are and were all that had to be considered, the other environmental issues I have raised would still stand. I have spoken to many people about this subject, including many who know nothing of orgonomy, and so far, nobody has had any trouble grasping that it is foolish to tamper with such prominent natural phenomena as hurricanes.
One does not need to have ever heard of orgone to understand that. I made several reasons clear enough in some of the messages I sent to you and your associates, and so far, you still have not delt with them. Instead of trying to convince me the machine works, or that I should abandon 40 years of solid observations of how orgone energy behaves and accept some quantum physics theory on a basis of reading a book, why not start with dealing with the main and most important issue: What is the the proper and responsible use of weather-modification technologies of any kind?
I have sent you and the others of your group several suggestions along those lines. So far, no response.


Joel Carlinsky

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Blog Archive