Electric Oranur And A Fear Of Nature

The universally distributed orgone energy is referred to as "primary energy". All the known energies of conventional physics, such as heat, light, electricity, magnetism, gravity, etc., are called "secondary energies". All forms of secondary energy, if concentrated enough, and intense enough, are irritants to orgone enery in the natural state.

Any strong source of electromagnetic excitation will irritate the surrounding orgone in the same way nuclear energy does, though not as strongly. The relatively mild oranur effect from electrical apparatus is of the same basic quality as the more intense oranur reaction from radioactive materials.

Oranur excitation has numerous biological effects. It also has meteorological effects. Both have been observed from electromagnetic devices. The health effects of high-voltage devices are well-known and have been intensively studied and documented by conventional biologists, though explained by mechanistic theories. There is no room for doubt that strong EM fields cause numerous forms of illnesses.

The effects of EM on weather have been less noticed and less studied, but there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that all high-voltage alternating current equipment has an expansive effect on the atmosphere, breaking up clouds and increasing tendencies toward drought.

A strong EM source, such as a radar or microwave dish, radio or TV broadcasting antenna, or high-voltage long-range power-transmission lines, will trigger a mild oranur reaction of the atmosphere that will cause or intensify a drought tendency, break up clouds that drift in from other areas, and if intense enough, may block oncoming storm fronts. Since we are talking about orgone energy reactions to the excitation, not the electrical field itself, the inverse square law does not apply and the reange of such effects can be fairly extensive.

There is no particular frequency or other distinguishing characteristic of the EM source that has one effect or another. The intensity of the EM is the relevant factor. The effect can be made directional, but it cannot be reversed to cause condensation or contraction of the atmosphere, which is the condition needed for rain.

Oranur cannot be used to control weather in the sense of obtaining a desired result unless the result desired is chaos. Therefore, no electromagnetic method of weather control can ever be invented. however, many electromagnetic devices are able to give the illusion that they can control weather because they can be seen to break up small cumulus clouds directly overhead. This small-scale effect can be convincing enough that people who see it without understanding it may fall into thinking that other, grander, effects are thereby proven.

It sometimes happens that people unfamiliar with the knowledge of orgone energy observe the breaking up of small clouds due to some source of electromagnetic excitation and think they have discovered something new. They often think they have found a way to "control the weather" and try to figure out some theory of how the phenomenon works. Once they have invented such a theory, no matter how far-fetched and unproven, they become adamant about it. The initial valid observation then serves to convince them of the theory, not just of the factual observation, despite it having been concocted after the observation and not having demonstrated any predictive value.  

Without any scientific training or understanding of the way a scientific theory is constructed and tested, such a person is often able to win others to believe in his ideas because of both his evident sincerity and his ability to demonstrate a real effect that is relatively obscure and not known to the observers. If an ideology or a psychological predisposition that appeals to a significant number of people is added into the mix, we can end up with a weather-control cult.

That is apparently what has happened in the case of David Wells and his following, who are known as the Weather Rangers. From the initial observation by Mr. Wells that the unusual type of electric motor he was working on could cause clouds to disintegrate overhead, a cult-following has developed within the so-called "free energy" movement, a mostly right-wing movement of technophiliacs who believe technological development is the solution to environmental problems.

Technophilia is a form of orgasm anxiety in which the victim projects his fears of the feelings of the life energy in his own body onto the outside world. He suffers from a fear of nature which may focus on the idea that without firearms humans would be exterminated by wild animals, that without modern medicine everyone would be killed by diseases, or,in the case at hand, that normal weather is too dangerous to be lived with.

A certain percentage of the population suffer from Lapsophilia, an extreme and irrational fear of bad weather. This fear may be particularly common in areas such as the American Midwest, where Mr. Wells happens to live,and where tornadoes are common, and in the Carribean, where hurricanes are a frequent occurence and where his most active follower, Alberto Feliciano, happens to live. Persons with this condition are inordinately terrified of hurricanes and tornadoes and would obviously welcome uncritically a method of weather-control which promised to protect them from such terrifying phenomena.

It does not occur to them that we somehow managed to stay alive for not only thousands, but MILLIONS of years without this invention they think is so vital to our survival. They show considerable egotism, amounting to hubris, if they think the survival of the human race depends on their personal contribution.

What they really express is a fear of nature. This irrational fear of the natural environment is very common in this modern world. It is, in fact, at the roots of all environmental problems. Their evident technophilia is a symptom of this fear. Technology is by definition, man's attempt to control nature, and the motivation is at the deepest level, a fear of nature inside oneself, which is based on the endemic sexual repression in this culture and is projected outwards onto the convenient screen of the natural world in the technophiliac personality.

In one e-mail to me Mr. Wells says:

"uncontrolled storms ravage and kill ", and then he repeats it a few lines down the page:

"Until machines are in place , nature can ravage and kill . Droughts and floods and forest fires come and go at natures call . It is time man takes control of the weather . Until this happens , people will die and property will get destroyed ."

It is hard to imagine a clearer demonstration of the fear of nature and natural functioning that Reich devoted so much of his career to unmasking than this statement. The person whio is a victim of such fear  finds the natural world, the environment in which we developed over millions of years and to which we are best adapted, a frightening place dangerously beset by frightening natural phenomena, instead of seeing it as our ancient home, the place where we are safest and should feel the most secure and comfortable.

 Instead of feeling exaltation and awe at the titantic power of a mighty storm as it cleans the atmosphere and contributes to the preservation of life on earth, he feels frightened and wants to control it, just as the sexually repressed person who fears the feeling of life stiring in his own body feels frightened and wants to kill it or re-direct it into less "dangerous" channels.

One is reminded of the saying, " You can take the boy out of the Bible Belt, but you cannot take the Bible Belt out of the Boy". For it is indeed the sexually repressive culture of theBible Belt that contributes greatly to the formation of a character structure that fears nature and hopes to control it.

 Mr. Wells and his followers are fully convinced of the effectiveness of their device, although they have not yet made public any evidence. I doubt they ever will. But under the influence of a strong need to believe in it, they will not listen to any information that tells them the device could be harmfull to either the atmosphere or to humans, including themselves.

But despite their professed desire to "save lives", they are actually contributing to the death of the atmosphere. Adding even more DOR to the already excessive amount of DOR created by modern technologies is not "saving lives". It is taking lives in the long run. Orgone energy is the force that keeps all life going, and if it is damaged or killed, all life suffers and  dies.