Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Total Pageviews

Friday, November 19, 2010

Letter From An Orgonomist

--- On Tue, 8/10/10, R........................ wrote:

From: R...........................
Subject: Re: Oranur, Technophilia, and Hubris
To: joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2010, 12:01 PM

Hello,  Joel Carlinsky.   
          Thank you for emailing me, a semi retired psychiatrist in Oakland, CA, this and other recent essays referring to "Weather Rangers".    Do you consider Trevor Constable,  James DeMeo, Ph.D. and/or Richard Blasband, M.D. to be 'same as' or 'similar to' weather rangers in the effects of their research and publications?... Differences ?.. Thank you for a reply.    Cordially, R..........., M.D.  
 
 
My reply was:
 

No, I do not consider the people you mentioned in the same catagory as the Weather Rangers. There are many important differences.
 
I have often been very critical of DeMeo for not being as careful of ecological factors as he could be and sometimes not taking into account orgonomic knowledge which he should have been able to figure out by mere logic from what he knows, but sometimes forgets in the course of an operation. But he does know the facts of orgonomy. And he does try to work within them when he remembers to do so. That is a far cry from the incredible ignorance and major interference with important weather systems that the Weather Rangers have made their outspoken policy. I cannot imagine DeMeo doing anything as stupid as they are doing. He means well, but needs to be reminded at times of things he knows but forgets.
 
As for Blasband, I have been critical of him for many things, including being a friend of ex-Nazis, getting into mysticism, toruring mice in bogus cancer experiments, and supporting the early work of Trevor Constable. But I have not had anything critical to say about his cloudbusting because except for what Jerome Eden said about his having screwed up an operation in California in 1977 due to cloudbuster anxiety, I do not know of anything he did wrong in that field. His published reports in the Journal Of Orgonomy are all perfectly respectable work except for the last one, an overview of the field, in which he veers off into mysticism.  I know of no harm done by any of his operations, so I have not been critical of him for his cloudbusting work, only for failing to recognize how dangerously mad Constable was.
 
Constable is a very capable and competent psychopath, and has made several very important original discoveries in cloudbusting. That he lies about them, claims more than he has actually done, and mixes Steinerian mysticism into his theories is not the problem. That he is a power-freak, and uses picturesque descriptions like "swinging the atmosphere around like a small dog on a leash", or "take the Orgone by the balls and it will talk. Any other aproach and it laughs at you" should tell you as a psychiatrist something about the way he does cloudbusting. Blasband should have seen how power-drunk the man was, but did not until Eden and I blew the whistle on him. I attribute that bit of blindness to Blasband's latent mysticism.
 
Constable has done a lot of damage with the cloudbuster over his 40-odd years in the field, most of it intentional, causing serious floods by consistantly shooting for rainfall records to convince people his operations worked, but he is retired now and the only thing we have to worry about from him now is the legacy he left us of followers who think he is the greatest thing to come along in orgonomy since Reich invented orgasms.
 
The Weather Rangers, however, are poised to do more harm than Constable and DeMeo ever did. They do not know anything at all about orgone energy. They have just accidently made a discovery of a device that creates an oranur field, noticed it can do things to the weather, and without realizing that what it does is harmful or that it is also a public health menace, they are pushing it as a great thing to make it possible to destroy the atmospheric life energy.
 
DeMeo and Constable never did anything as willfully stupid as deliberately causing oranur. These Weather Derangers are trying to create oranur fields to break up much-needed storms and will end up killing what little is left of the life energy of the earth. And their reaction if you try to tell them of what Reich discovered is that their machine has nothing to do with Reich or orgone. They think it works on some crazy new principle that nobody ever knew about before.
 
You are invited to join my new discussion list, Orgonomic Ecology,   
 to receive more mailings on this topic and speak up and say what you think about these issues. It would be a good thing to have a voice familiar with orgonomic psychology on the list. Your imput would be appreciated.
 
 
 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive