Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.


In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.

In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.

The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.

About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, November 19, 2010

Book Review

Preliminary Analysis of Changes in Kansas Weather
Coincidental to Experimental Operations
with a Reich Cloudbuster. 
With the Appendix,
Evidence for a Principle of Atmospheric Continuity
And a New Preface, 2010.
by James DeMeo, PhD
is a re-print of his 1978 master's thesis on the cloudbuster, done at the University of Kansas.  Dr. DeMeo had chosen his thesis topic while still an undergraduate in Florida, then searched all over the United States for a university that would allow him to do a thesis on it. He found a Professor Robert Nunley, in the Goegraphy Department at K.U., who had had some of his own work ridiculed by the scientific establishment, and was later vindicated. Nunley, as a result of his own experiences, agreed to help DeMeo gain acceptance.
But it was a rocky road. Two members of the thesis committee quit in protest over the thesis, not because of the topic, but because of what they regarded as shoddy science. Although DeMeo managed to derive enough material for a 300-page thesis from his cloudbusting experiments, he had, at the time he finished writing the thesis, only conducted a total of SEVEN cloudbusting operations. To obtain ANY statistical conclusion from a total of only seven examples is torturing the statistics beyond what is normally accepted in science.
Since the aim of the thesis was to test the effectiveness of the cloudbuster to see if it really had an effect on the weather or not, there could be only two possible outcomes for each individual operation: it either worked or it did not. Either a yes or a no.
So think about it for a moment. If an extraterrestrial UFO beamed up SEVEN humans to find out about the sexual distribution among humans, they would have to conclude that there are four males to every three females, or four females to every three males in the human species. Seven is simply not a large enough sample to reveal the true ratio of males to females.
It is also not a large enough sample to tell if the cloudbuster works or not. There are only two possible answers to the question for each operation, and to reach a firm conclusion it would be necessary to analyze a larger sample.
It should also be noted that this thesis, done to meet a university requirement, is the only one of the author's numerous publications that actually tells how the operation was done. This was something he disliked having to do, but was forced to because of the standard scientific requirement that a scientific report must include enough information to permit independent replication. Dr. DeMeo usually refuses to reveal his procedures for fear that someone else might thereby be able to conduct cloudbusting operations independently of himself.
For that reason, he now, in making this volume available, will only sell it to a very restricted group of people who meet with his approval. This self-censorship of scientific information will not help in convincing the rightly skeptical scientific community of the validity of his work, which is his alleged aim.
 In the past, I have pointed out that all his other publications on the subject fail to disclose sufficient detail to rise to the level of scientific reporting, and that therefore no scientific report on cloudbusting has ever been published by him with the sole exception of this thesis. Now, having produced a book version of the thesis, he continues his policy of censorship by restricting the readership top people who meet with his personal approval. Therefore, this publication still does nothing to meet the normal scientific requirement to make public one's research.
It should be noted, however, that a photocopy edition of this thesis has long been available to anyone with the money to buy it from University Microfilms in Ann Arbor, Michigan. So the attempt to restrict the readership is already moot.
But many years of experience has demonstrated that a lack of detailed information on how to conduct cloudbusting operations does not discourage anyone from trying. Hundreds of  people who have only the sketchiest information on cloudbusting have made the attempt, and by now it should be obvious that it is better to give them the information they need to do it properly than to have them doing it anyway without that information.
But unfortunately, the reader wishing to learn how to do cloudbusting will be disappointed after reading this book. There is very little information given here that is not already available elsewhere, especially in the writings of Wilhelm Reich. Even more disappointing, given that the information here is now over thirty years old, is that no further development has taken place in this field. That Dr. DeMeo feels it necessary to re-print a work over thirty years old shows the paucity of development in the field of cloudbusting.
A large part of that is the orientation revealed in this thesis. The emphasis is on providing "proof" to non-believers, not on aquiring new knowledge. The purpose of the work undertaken was to convince skeptical scientists. But science is not about winning converts. Science is supposed to be about learning more about nature. It is not the function of a scientist to convince reluctant collegues of something he already is convinced of. It is the job of a scientist to study natural phenomena, and report what he finds.
Dr.DeMeo is not alone in this erroneous misconception of the job of a scientist. Nearly everyone involved in orgonomy makes the same error. The unfortunate history of orgonomy has resulted in an obcession with "proving" orgone energy exists, or in the case of cloudbusting, "proving" the cloudbuster can affect the weather.
And while all the effort has been focused on trying to win converts, hardly anything has been done to learn more about how the atmospheric orgone energy behaves under normal conditions, which is the all-important first step to learning how the technique of cloudbusting could be improved.
This edition also contains two articles on the theory of the ether, both of which are posted on the author's website. They are both good articles, and I have several times suggested them to people. If Dr. DeMeo would only stick to writing such scientific historical articles and leave cloudbusting alone, both he and the world would be much better off.
If you are interested in joining an on-line discussion group dealing with cloudbusting and the environmental issues it raises, you are invited to join

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Blog Archive