Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, November 19, 2010

Learning Cloudbusting

The oranurization of the global atmosphere by technological use of radioactivity remains the worst threat to the long-term viability of this planet, but cloudbuster proliferation is a fast-growing second.
 
Much of the increase in weather-related disasters in recent years is almost certainly the result of the improvement in communications made possible by the internet. Cloudbuster proliferation has vastly increased in recent years, mainly as a result of well-intentioned fools who spread information about cloudbusting over the internet, imagining that they are helping to "spread the word", or in some cases, even fantacising they are thwarting some evil conspiracy to "silence Reich".
 
The belief is common in conspiracy-theory circles that there is some secret government agency that knows all about cloudbusting, is using it themselves for some nefarious purpose, and wants to keep anyone else from using it. Many of these people think this is the reason Reich was jailed, and that he was murdered in prison to keep him from revealing any more about it to the public. So they think they should encourage as many people as possible to start doing cloudbusting in their backyards to break the government monopoly on weather control.

The problem is further complicated by idiots who think there is some "information" someplace on the internet about "how to do" cloudbusting. There is no such "information". Learning to do cloudbusting is not a matter of "information"and cannot be taught over the internet. Cloudbusting cannot be reduced to a cookbook recipie of "do this, and this will happen", "do that, and that will happen".
 
Cloudbusting training should start with a through background in orgone biophysics, followed by additional study of how the normal atmosphere functions, the various pathologies that can take place in it, and what the causes of them are. Only then does it become apparent what to do in an intervention.

This is apparently not comprehensible to the people who think it is possible to learn "how to do cloudbusting" without bothering to first learn how the normal atmosphere behaves and the reasons for whatever problems may arise in it.
 
The first thing that a would-be cloudbuster operator needs to learn is not how to do cloudbusting; it is how NOT to do cloudbusting. The first thing to learn is what not to do; the mistakes and errors to avoid. Only after that is it safe to learn what to do. Yet this concept is conspicuously missing from the numerous websites that proport to teach cloudbusting to the masses as a hobby.
 
Specific examples of mistakes by operators who have published reports of their operations are an important teaching tool to illustrate to beginners what to avoid doing. A comparison of the published reports with an ecological analysis afterwards is the best way to show the whole range of possible errors.  If someone is going to start doing cloudbusting, the first step should be to take a good look at what others have done wong. That is one reason I have published so many criticisms of the people who have published so much about their operations. They serve as the best possible illustrations of what NOT to do, and that is what a beginning student most needs to learn.
 
A good example of what NOT to do is the adoption of electricly-operated remote controled cloudbusters by Blasband, DeMeo, and those under their influence. This done supposedly  for the safety of the operator, but is a wrong way to go about it.
 
The extent of the field around the cloudbuster can vary greatly, depending not
 only on the size of the cloudbuster and how it is grounded, but also on weather conditions and the location.

 Operator safety can be accomplished best by the operator
 knowing what symptoms to watch for. Also, having another
 person nearby, but not directly in contact with the
 cloudbuster, to watch the operator for any signs of
 overcharge.

     It is also possible for the operator to take certain
 nuitricional suplements which increase resistance to the most
 likely sort of medical harm from overcharge. And, of course,
 frequent immersion in water while operating is a good idea.

   But remote control of the cloudbuster is a very bad idea
 because that means separation between the operator and the
 energetic system of the cloudbuster, and through that, of
 the atmosphere, which deprives him of the most important
 information input- the bioenergetic contact with the
 apparatus and atmosphere that tells him what is going on.

Carolyn Cooper, while doing cloudbusting in Ireland, was
 able to tell when the cloudbuster made energetic contact
 with a storm far out at sea by the feel of the energy
 passing down the pipes. That is the best way to monitor
 cloudbusting operations. Without such direct contact, the
 operator cannot know what results he is having until it is
 too late to correct any mistakes.

       There is no instrumentation that can tell what a
 cloudbuster is doing to the atmosphere. There never will be,
 despite the bogus claims of such devices as the
 "orgonotester" that is sold by DeMeo and others.
 The only way to detect atmospheric orgone changes is
 biologically, and for that, direct orgonotic contact of
 cloudbuster and operator is needed. That is why remote
 control is a mistake.
 
All cloudbusting should be done with the three "deeps" in mind.
 
DEEP SPACE,
 
 DEEP TIME,
 
and DEEP ECOLOGY.
 
DEEP SPACE means all operations are global. Anything you do with a cloudbuster affects the whole planet. There is no such thing as a local cloudbusting operation. Distant effects should be expected.
 
DEEP TIME means remembering the earth was very different in the not-too-distant past. To restore the atmosphere to health is not the same thing as returning it to the way it has been for the past few hundred years or the past few thousand years. Paleoclimatology and paleoecology must be taken into account in deciding what is really normal and setting goals for the program..
 
DEEP ECOLOGY means all cloudbusting should be BIOCENTRIC, NOT ANTHROPOCENTRIC. That means the needs of the entire ecosystem should be considered first, not the ecconomic, political, or agricultural needs of the human species. Just as a doctor is supposed to treat any patient without regard to nationality or politics, a cloudbuster operator should rise above the human species and see himself as working for all life, not just his own kind.
 
   Cloudbusting has more in common with a
> neuromuscular activity like swimming or riding a
> bicycle than with intellectual learning.
>
> It requires paying attention to very slight
> proprioceptive sensations that most people ignore, just as
> riding a bicycle requires subliminal attention to slight
> changes in balance and constant corrections to maintain
> course.
>
> Cloudbusting requires seeing very slight changes in
> color and light intensity in the sky, the feel of the air,
> the direction and force of the wind, changes in wind
> direction and intensity, and constant attention to ones'
> own body sensations of well-being. It also requires
> attention to animal behavior, such as frogs croaking, bees
> buzzing, dogs sleeping or barking, birds flying higher or
> lower, farther or shorter distances between resting, number
> of insects visible at the time of day, and how other people
> look and act.
>
> If your assistant becomes red in the face, if children
> get into fights near the cloudbuster, if birds come and
> perch on the cloudbuster, all these must be interpeted and
> integrated into what you are doing and how successfull you
> are being at it.
>
> The action of elevating cloudbuster pipes has effects
> on the expansion or contraction of the atmospheric orgone at
> very long distances. Operations in Bennington, Vermont,
> caused a nearly simultaneous reaction in trees in New Haven,
> Connecticut, almost 300 miles (500 kilometers) away. The
> electrical potentials between electrodes inserted in the
> tree bark changed according to what the cloudbuster was
> doing every time. A graph of the two factors is a perfect
> match.
>
> This shows the biological effects of cloudbusting on
> the entire biosphere, quite independently of the mechanistic
> parameters of the weather. That is why meteorologists have
> virtually no knowledge that is relevant to cloudbusting.
> Cloudbusting has little to do with meteorology. It is a
> biological science, not part of physics. It cannot be
> understood on a basis of physics.
>
> Cloudbusting can be compared to sexual foreplay
> or stroking a pet. You are stroking a big animal, the
> atmosphere. You are trying to get a specific reaction, and
> you must be alert to how it is reacting and change your
> actions as needed to get the response you want. But try
> explaining that to a meteorologist!
>
> People like DeMeo, who see cloudbusting in terms of
> how much rain falls, and think that is the criteria of
> success  are the very ones LEAST competent to
> understand or practice orgonomic weather work. Look at those
> charts and graphs he has published! All that work to
> illustrate how much rain fell! And no attention at all to
> what the effects of his operations on the biosphere were!
> And yet, as Reich himself said in Contact With Space, Reich
> never tried to bring rain to Arizona, he did not bring rain
> there, and if rain had fallen, it would have prevented the
> growth of the vegetation that he did produce.
>
> Somehow, some people manage to read a book like
> Contact With Space without noticing that. They are too
> fixated on the idea that cloudbusting is
> "rainmaking" and entirely miss the point that it is working
> on the BIOSPHERE.
>
> I see contemporary cloudbuster operators as going
> farther and farther astray from the basic principals
> propounded by Reich. They try to use electrical devices to
> measure their effects on the atmosphere, while using remote
> controled cloudbusters to avoid the personal contact with
> the energetic system of the cloudbuster, and through that,
> of the atmosphere, which could tell trhem what effects they
> are having.
>
> They are so far from paying attention to their own
> bodily sensations that they do not notice that their own
> remote control devices, powered by electricity, are
> counteracting the effects they are trying to produce and
> making the drought worse.
>
> And they study physics and meteorology and think that somehow
> makes them more qualified to do cloudbusting, even though
> nothing in the meteorology curriculum has anything to do
> with cloudbusting, while they ignore the biological effects
> of cloudbusting almost entirely.
>
> And, increasingly, we read in the papers about extreme
> weather events like the recent floods in the U.K. which are
> the end result of mechanistic incompetents like
> DeMeo fooling around with cloudbusters.
>
> Children are able to learn cloudbusting better than
> adults not only because they are less armored and less
> indoctrinated into a mechanistic world-view, but also
> because they are more attentive to their own bodily
> sensations and to the physical reactions of other people
> around them, including people of other species.
>
> Also, children are, on average, more responsible and
> considerate than adults, especially scientists, most of whom
> would be willing to risk destroying the world to perform
> some interesting experiment, as the recent fiasco in
> Switzerland demonstrates.
>
> Cloudbusting is not likely to be
> taught in schools. However, there are other venues for
> learning besides schools. It might be possible to run a
> summer camp dedicated to orgonomy, for example. Kids from 8
> to 16 could come and spend 6 weeks studying orgone
> biophysics, including cloudbusting and go home trained to
> help the atmosphere in their neighborhood if they think it
> needs it.
>
> That would make much more sense than getting adult
> meteorologists and physicists involved.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Blog Archive