Cloudbusters And Inventions

                                Cloudbusters  And  Inventions
                                              by Joel Carlinsky

Ben Franklin invented the lightning rod in 1749. The lightning rods used today are exactly the same as those Franklin invented. There has been no improvement in design in the more than 250 years since. Why is that? While hundreds, even thousands, of new inventions and improved technologies have come and gone, the simple lightnimng rod has never been improved upon.

The reason is not hard to understand. It rests on the physics of lightning and the basic nature of the lightning rod itself. Lightning seeks the easiest path to the ground. A simple conductive rod provides that pathway. No improvement in design is possible because the present design is the most simple and direct solution to the problem of how to protect buildings from lightning which the physics of lightning will allow.

The Reich cloudbuster is in a similar position. There are well-known and well-established laws of orgone energy, tested by a large number of experiments that have been independently verified by many individuals over many years, and the cloudbuster, as designed by Reich in 1952, is the application of those laws. One of those laws is that orgone energy is strongly attracted to water. Another is that DOR, the stagnant, toxic form of orgone, is even more strongly attracted to water than is the motile, healthy form of orgone. And another is that it is the build-up of DOR in the atmosphere that underlies droughts, and desert-formation.

To restore normal rainfall patterns in a drought-stricken area, the DOR that is the cause of the drought must be drained off and disposed of. The cloudbuster does exactly that,. The metal tubes act as a conduit, and the water into which the tubes are grounded acts to attract the DOR from the atmosphere through the tubes into the water. The principle is so simple it is almost impossible to misunderstand it.

Nevertheless, some people do somehow manage to accomplish that incredible intellectual feat. And they proceed to add all sorts of charms to the cloudbuster in an effort to improve the effectiveness of it. They incorporate cones, pyramids, magnets, crystals, and other new-age junk into the design, thinking they are inventing brilliant improvements on the cloudbuster. The fact that none of this increases the attraction of water for orgone or DOR in the sky, or the ability of tubes to form a conduit, does not occur to them.

Another such failure to grasp the principles underlying cloudbusting is the attempt to eliminate the need to ground a cloudbuster into water. Some people have thought that if the tubes were connected to an orgone accumulating device instead of to water, that would suffice. Others have thought that some favored geometrical shape would provide attraction and allow the elimination of water grounding. Still others have thought that if the tubes were in motion, with power provided by some kind of motor, the result would be an effective cloudbuster despite a lack of any connection to water.

 Needless to say, none of these innovations has ever done anything except serve to add additional excitation to the already over-excited atmosphere, ultimately leading to complications and more problems.

And then there are those whose creative genius and inventiveness leads them to claim the cloudbuster does not draw energy at all, but projects it instead. They think the cloudbuster somehow is a source of ¨''beams'' of energy ''shooting out'' from it into the atmosphere. Some of them think the water the cloudbuster is grounded into is the source of this energy and that the tubes of a cloudbuster, when inserted into the water, somehow ''break free'' the energy contained in the water, and it is then ''shot forth'' into the air through the tubes.

And if that was not enough to be wrong about, they then proceed to use newer models that dispense with water-grounding, leaving them without any explanation of where the energy they think is being ''shot out'' by the tubes is coming from. Apparently they think some geometrical shapes can create orgone energy from nothing.

And when they build their ''new, improved'' model of the cloudbuster, they somehow manage to convince themselves it is working. Part of this is due to what is called

Confirmation bias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and part of it is not knowing about some of the laws of orgone energy. Orgone energy systems each have their specific capacity level, the amount of orgonotic charge they are able to hold. Up to that level, an orgone energy system attracts more energy from it's surroundings, including weaker systems nearby. When the capacity level is reached, there is a sudden discharge. In general, the higher the charge, the more expanded the system is and when it discharges, there is a series of sudden, sharp contractions.

In the case of an atmospheric system, when the atmosphere is highly-charged it is in a state of expansion and the weather will be clear and dry. When there is a discharge, there will be rapid contraction, followed closely by rain. Normally, the atmosphere pulsates, expanding and contracting regularly, with regular rainfall as a result. DOR inhibits this cycle, and can cause the process to become stuck at either stage of the pulsation, with chronic expansion causing drought, and a lasting contraction causing floods.

Any form of irritation by secondary energies such as radioactivity or electrical current, especially high-voltage alternating current, will make the atmosphere expand. If there is a drought, there is already a state of chronic expansion, and the added excitation of an electrical device will increase the expansion. Up to the point of the system's capacity. Then there will be a discharge, characterized by a sudden, sharp contraction, or a series of contractions, resulting in rain. Frequently, excessive rain, far more than would ever fall normally in that region.

This sometimes gives the impression of being able to ''bring rain'' by means of some electromagnetic device or some other device that creates excitation, such as a moving orgone accumulator, which becomes excited by fast passage through the orgone field of the earth, and in turn, excites that ambient field by rapid passage through it.

But the rain, even if far more than would be normal or desireable for that area, does not end the drought problem. Eventually, the rain will stop as the contraction levels off, and then the drought will resume. Droughts do not ''just happen''. They are caused by build-up of DOR, and unless the DOR is removed, the drought will continue.

So a device that uses a moving orgone accumulator will only add to the already excessive excitation, causing a temporary break in the drought by over-exciting the atmosphere until it contracts in reaction, but since it does not draw off the DOR that is the cause of the drought into a body of water, the break will be only temporary, even when the amount of rain is more than normal, and the drought will resume.

So if someone makes a claim to have invented an improvement on the original basic design of the cloudbuster, and that improvement consists of some geometrical shape that is allefged to ''shoot out'' orgone energy, or of a moving orgone accumulator or accumulators, spinning around but not connected to any body of water, and not acting as a conduit to conduct atmospheric DOR to water, and if the device is made to move by means of an electrical motor, anyone familiar with basic orgone physics would know instantly what that device does and how it does it.

And what any such device does, is to excite the atmosphere into an even greater state of expansion, until it reacts by contracting sharply, which will only cause rain to fall, but will not solve a drought problem. What it will do, in fact, is make the long-term drought problem worse. There will still be a local infestation of DOR, and the atmospheric orgone will be further weakened and less able to contract by itself the next time. The next episode of drought will last longer as a result of such an ill-advised inteervention.

Proper cloudbusting would be to do DOR-removal, restoring the ability of the atmosphere to pulsate normally, and produce rain at more or less regular intervals. For that, it is necessary to provid a conduit to draw DOR down out of the sky into a body of water. This is a conclusion reached by fiollowing the basic laws of orgione energy. And it is not going to change.

No new invention will ever be invented that enables cloudbusting to be done properly without the cloudbuster being grounded into water. No new invention will ever be invented that uses some geometrical shapes to ''shoot out''  any ''beams'' of orgone energy. Nobody is ever going to solve a drought problem, which is caused by build-up of DOR in the atmosphere, by over-exciting the already over-expanded atmosphere to the point of collapse into a state of contraction. All that can be done that way is to ''make rain'', which does not solve the drought. It just makes it worse.

And anyone who thinks they have a better way to do cloudbusting needs to go back to grade school and study how orgone energy functions. We do not need any better cloudbusters. What we need is better operators.

 We need more knowledge of how the atmospheric energy behaves, both in it's normal state, and when it is behaving pathologically as a result of DOR. It is there, in the study of the behavior of the atmosphere, to improve the knowledge and techniques of the operator, not in some ''new, improved'' gadget, that advances in cloudbusting will be made.

Ash Palise And The Spider

Ash Palise And The Spider

 

              The Screw-up That Caused The Worst Floods In Australian History

                                           by Joel Carlinsky

 

 

 

Here, copied from a video posted by Ash Palise, is a picture of the so-called "spider unit" device he used to cause atmospheric energy changes to test out a new orgone energy field meter he had purchased from James DeMeo.

 

The spider unit was developed by Trevor Constable. It consists of small orgone accumulators mounted on a wheel that spins around. The rapid motion of the accumulators through the energy field of the earth causes excitation of the earth's field, and in stagnant conditions, can break up the stagnation, restoring normal pulsation, and allowing usual rainfall patterns to resume.

 

But if the stagnation is too strongly entrenched it will take much more time to get results, and if the device is kept spinning too long in an effort to get results, the excitation will only increase the drought tendencies, up to the point of the capacity level of the atmospheric system. Then the atmosphere will contract sharply and suddenly in a reaction to the over-expansion caused, and prolonged, heavy rains will be the result.

 

In the case of the recent rains in Queensland, Ash Palise was testing his new field meter, and was not aware the spider device could affect the weather. He thought of it only as a way to change the readings on his meter. So he was not expecting any great effect on the weather, and was not looking for any. When it came, he did not recognize it as a result of his own operations.

 

The effect was rendered much greater than usual because of another thing he did not know. Any strong source of electrical current is contra-indicated near any form of orgone equipment. Electrical voltage excites orgone energy in a way that differs only in degree from that of nuclear energy, which has a much stronger effect on orgone devices, rendering them highly toxic.

 

To rotate the device, Ash used an electric motor, visible in the photograph, underneath the center of the device, which had two harmful effects.

 

 First, it increased the over-excitation of the orgone atmosphere surrounding the unit, making the atmosphere expand more than it would otherwise have before sharply contracting, more than it normally would have, so the rain that resulted was more than it would have been otherwise.

 

Second, the field of an operating cloudbuster has effects on humans who stay too near it for two long, which is why many of the most well-informed cloudbuster operators use remote-controlled cloudbusters so they can operate them from a safe distance without having to remain close to them. Ash was not aware of this, nor was he aware that electrical excitation would make the toxic effects on the operator even stronger than in the case of a cloudbuster alone, without any associated electrical voltage.

 

The effects caused by strong electrical stimulation of orgone devices are the same type, though less intense, as the oranur effects caused by introducing radioactivity into an accumulator. The oranur effect is typified by a high degree of variability, hitting each individual at his weakest spot, bringing up into noticeable symptomatology any latent illnesses and sub-clinical weaknesses an individual might have.

 

In some people, this might mean having a stroke or heart attack many years earlier than they would otherwise have had it. In others, the weakest spot might be behavioral, and a latent predisposition to mental illness might manifest. That seems to be what has happened to Ash Palise.

 

 

Spider device used by Ash Palise to start the catastrophic rains in Queensland, Australia, January, 2011. This photo from his own posted material shows that he had and was using this type of equipment within the time-frame that would produce the results I have described.

 

Once the rain had started, Ash, still not realizing he had caused it in the first place, tried to stop it, using a standard, water-grounded cloudbuster. He asked advice via e-mail from his contacts in America, but either because of their advice, or in spite of it, he drew from too high an angle, closely aproximating a vertical draw, causing the already sharply-contracted atmosphere to contract still more, increasing the strength and duration of the rains he was trying to stop.

 

The rest is already well-known.

 

 

 

A Letter To A Critic

I have not singled Ash out for any special approbation. In the past six months or so, I have been equally critical of a group called the Weather Rangers, who were planning to try to interfere with hurricanes and tornadoes, and a German-based group who are conducting a desert-greening program in Algeria which caused the heat-wave in Europe and Russia this past summer. And my highly critical over-view of the numerous cloudbusting blunders by James DeMeo remains prominently posted on my website.

I have also been equally critical of Trevor Constable in the past, though since he is now retired from cloudbusting it would be moot to spend time on him now. And I wrote numerous critical posts about the attempt by John Hutchinson to clean up the Gulf oil spill by blasting the water with sound waves without first seeking to find out what effects that might have on the many forms of marine life that navigate by sound and might become disoriented by his undersea noise machine.

My whistle-blowing about Ash is right in keeping with my exposing other individuals and groups who conduct cloudbusting operations that result in disasters. On the other hand, I would like to point out that when someone does cloudbusting that does not cause any problems, I do not criticize. I am not against all cloudbusting. What I am against is improper cloudbusting.

And while man-made radioactivity is a more serious problem, it is not one that I can say anything about that has not already been said by others, while cloudbusting is a topic upon which I can say something the people who read it are not likely to see elsewhere.

Accidental Confirmation

In a recent mocking and condescending e-mail to me, Jamie Ogg wrote

   "Blaming Ash for Australia floods is absurd. Actually Ash worked
   to prevent the continuation of the floods with advice from others
   in CB work more knowledgeable about weather than you. (and no joel
   I was not the one giving him advice on that) Maybe we should blame
   the Brazil floods on you."

I was not in Brazil, but Ash was in Queensland. And you have just confirmed that he did do cloudbusting in an effort to reduce the rainfall. Since he himself has already admitted he also did cloudbusting before the rains started, I now have the following sequence of events. First, Ash uses a dry excitation device, a so-called "Spider Unit", invented by Trevor Constable, to shift atmospheric potentials to get readings on his orgone field meter. He mistakenly thinks this device will not affect the weather, but the conditions are so highly charged that it adds enough extra excitation to the already over-stretched atmosphere that the atmosphere reacts with a strong contraction which causes a lot of rain.

Second, not realizing he himself caused the rain, he tries to stop it, asking advice from friends in America, most likely Ken Schwartz. His second intervention, using a properly grounded cloudbuster, draws from too high an angle, closely aproximating a vertical draw,  and therefore adds to the contraction and makes the rain worse, but he does not realize that it was his attempt to stop the rain that made it worse.

Third, I figured out what was happening and when the topic came up on the Keelynet list, I send an off-list e-mail to Jerry Decker explaining my hypothesis on the subject. Jerry sent it to several of his contacts and one of them forwarded it to Ash. Ash responded with his usual barrage of vituperation and threats, which he send copies of the several people including Jamie Ogg.

Jamie then wrote to me in a mocking, condescending tone, and included in his letter the line quoted above, confirming that Ash had done cloudbusting in an unsuccessful attempt to stop the rain.

The rest is deduced from a solid background knowledge of the orgone functioning of the atmosphere and how it reacts to cloudbusting.

Jamie says he was not the one Ash was taking technical advice from. I believe him. Jamie knows better than to do the things Ash did. If he had been the one advising Ash, the whole sequence of events would not have happened. But with Ken Schwartz advising Ash, it would be almost certain to happen. Schwartz claims to have been trained in cloudbusting by Trevor Constable. That is a lie. I contacted Peter Lindemann, who was a student of Constable for many years. He told me Schwartz was never a student of Constable and did not receive any training from him. He said Schwartz only interviewed Constable a couple of times for some articles he wrote for a website.

So this was a case of an untrained imposter advising Ash, and the result was a catastrophe. And now Ash is either in denial or trying to cover up his role in causing the disaster, but Jamie has accidentally revealed the fact that Ash did attempt to intervene and therefore confirmed my hypothesis.

Joel Carlinsky
( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )

From My Correspondence..............

 Hi, Sterling,

 

I took a look at your website and noticed the article on the current weather situation. I am somewhat bemused at the fact that while you reference nearly every unlikely wild unconfirmed rumor of weather control technologies in the hands of government organizations, you make no mention of a very real problem that you yourself know to exist, namely weather intervention by private individual backyard hobbyists.

 

I know you are aware of at least some of the hundreds, possibly even thousands by this time, of people who have found out from the internet how to make a home made weather control apparatus and are playing around with it, usually with good intentions, but zero knowledge of how to use it responsibly. Many of these people delude themselves that they are doing scientific research, proving to officialdom that the technology works, or helping the world by making rain, ending a drought, preventing hurricanes or other unwanted weather, etc., while in reality what they are doing is randomly vandalizing the already damaged atmosphere. As single individuals the amount of harm they can do is limited, but collectively, they are far more of a menace than any alleged secret government plot could ever be.

 

So why did you not mention them as a possible cause of the present weather catastrophe? Is it because you just do not consider privatre backyard experimenters to be a big enough problem to be worth bothering with compared to secret government agencies? Or is it that you do not want to call negative attention to these people for some reason?

 

If I were to write a speculative article on who could possibly be causing the weather events in question, I would name names of suspects. Ash Palaise would be at the top of the list for the situation in Australia, James DeMeo and the other members of the CORE Network would be mentioned as suspects in the North American weather conditions, and a certain Ken Schwartz would be on the list for his known history of irresponsibly playing around with the jet stream.

 

There is also a German group doing a desert greening project in Algeria who have been known to cause bad weather in Europe as a side effect of their attempts to improve conditions in North Africa. And there are some people in Germany, Switzerland, and Greece who are known to have messed up in the past and might be operating again now.

 

And, of course, there could be any number of other people I have never heard of who have accidently discovered from the internet how to build a cloudbuster, and decided to try it. I cannot keep track of them all. But if you are going to write an article on possible human causes of the novel weather now underway, the possibliity should at least be mentioned that it is not some government program like HAARP or chemtrails that is causing the problems, but well meaning hobbyists with home made equipment.

 

Frankly, I suspect you left these people out of consideration because you tend to identify with them as scientific pioneers, rather than see them as irresponsible menaces as I do. I think you do not want to bring them to public attention as a potential problem instead of as a solution. Am I wrong? Is that the reason you did not mention them? Or is there some other reason?

 

I wish we could co-operate on these issues, but you seem determined to give these people a free pass no matter how much damage they do.

 

Joel Carlinsky

Climate Shifts Really Caused By Cloudbusting

The article below is typical of the current hysteria over alleged greenhouse gases and the warming they are supposedly causing. Unknown to the proponents of the greenhouse gas theory, many, perhaps even most, of the extreme weather events they attribute to greenhouse gases are in fact caused by a few individuals using cloudbusters.

The heat waves in Europe and in Russia that are cited in this article are both known to have been caused by a group based in Germany who are conducting a foolish cloudbusting program in Algeria in an ill-informed attempt at "desert-greening". It was these bunglers who moved a hot desert air mass northward on both occasions, and no amount of restrictions on carbon emissions from combustion could have prevented the heat waves that they caused.

The several instances of extreme cold that the article also mentions are in several cases known to me to be due to other people who are trying to counter the "global warming" they have read about in the media by using cloudbusters to draw down colder air masses from the north in wintertime.

The mechanistic scientists who do not know about cloudbusters cannot be reasonably faulted for drawing the wrong conclusions from their wrong understanding of atmospheric functioning, but those who are aware of the enormous ability of the simple inexpensive device invented by Wilhelm Reich to alter weather over vast areas should recognize the effects of somebody cloudbusting when they see these media reports of "global warming" claimed to be caused by "greenhouse gases".

UN weather agency: scorching heat soon routine

• CANCUN, Mexico – The brutal heat waves that killed thousands of Europeans in 2003 and that choked Russia earlier this year will seem like average summers in the future as the Earth continues to warm, the U.N. weather agency said Tuesday

The last decade confirmed scientific predictions of 20 years ago that temperatures will rise and storms will become more fierce — and those trends are likely to continue, said Ghassam Asrar, who heads the climate research center at the World Meteorological Organization.
The WMO was due on Wednesday to release details on the last decade's global temperatures, but Asrar said it was the warmest on record.
Scientists say the warming trend is caused mainly by industrial pollution accumulating in the atmosphere and trapping heat. Negotiations conducted under U.N. auspices have been trying to find ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to keep temperatures from rising to levels likely to have disastrous consequences.
While it is difficult to attribute any single weather event to climate change, extreme events are becoming more common. Judging by the current trend, the unprecedented heat wave that scorched Europe in 2003 and Russia this July will seem cool by the end of the century, Asrar said.
"There is no question the past three decades have become progressively warmer," he said. "We are on an upward trajectory."
Although climate science is still evolving and learning from current patterns, Asrar said government planners should plan for a warming world.
In 2003 an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 people died from heat-related ailments or incidents, in the hottest summer since 1540. Russia's summer this year was the warmest this century and ignited peat fires in the forests around Moscow that suffocated the capital for weeks. Temperatures soared into the 30s Celsius (90s F) in normally chilly Siberia.
This year witnessed freakish weather, both heat and extreme cold, the WMO said. Records for low temperature were shattered in hundreds of U.S. locations, and heavy snowfall disrupted air and road traffic in Europe, the U.S. and China. Pakistan suffered floods that killed 1,700 people and displaced 20 million people. China also had unusually high temperatures, floods and landslides.
Negotiators at the two-week Cancun conference have a limited agenda of agreeing on the first steps to help poor countries deal with changes in climate and develop their economies in low-carbon ways. A key issue is to create a body to govern and distribute $100 billion dollars in climate aid for poor countries by 2020.
Delegates agreed at the last climate summit in Copenhagen last December to funnel $30 billion over the coming three years for "fast track" financing for poor countries who need immediate help. Projects include coastal management against ocean surges, help for small scale farmers whose traditional crops are ruined by changing weather patterns and to governments to help them plan for low-carbon growth.
The European Union said Tuesday it has mobilized euro2.2 billion ($2.9 billion ) this year, and is on track to meet its pledge of euro7.2 billion over three years in "fast track" financing. U.S. delegate Jonathan Pershing said Monday Washington has allocated $1.7 billion for 2010.

The Danger Of Cloudbuster Proliferation

The Danger Of Cloudbuster Proliferation

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and I now would place
cloudbusting in second place only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat facing this planet.

At  least several hundred individuals have experimented with cloudbusters in
recent years, and almost none of them have understood enough to be able
to avoid causing problems. Some of those problems have included serious
ecological disasters and the loss of numerous lives.

There is an anti-nuclear movement trying to protect the earth from nuclear power
plants. As a supliment to that movement, we urgently need an anti-cloudbuster
movement to protect the earth and it's atmosphere from what my teacher, the late
Dr. Eva Reich, used to call "wildcat" cloudbuster operators.

  Anyone interested in helping to protect the earth against incompetent and
irresponsible misuse of the cloudbuster, please contact me at:
 joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com

Joel Carlinsky