Cloudbusters And Inventions
by Joel Carlinsky
Ben Franklin invented the lightning rod in 1749. The lightning rods used today are exactly the same as those Franklin invented. There has been no improvement in design in the more than 250 years since. Why is that? While hundreds, even thousands, of new inventions and improved technologies have come and gone, the simple lightnimng rod has never been improved upon.
The reason is not hard to understand. It rests on the physics of lightning and the basic nature of the lightning rod itself. Lightning seeks the easiest path to the ground. A simple conductive rod provides that pathway. No improvement in design is possible because the present design is the most simple and direct solution to the problem of how to protect buildings from lightning which the physics of lightning will allow.
The Reich cloudbuster is in a similar position. There are well-known and well-established laws of orgone energy, tested by a large number of experiments that have been independently verified by many individuals over many years, and the cloudbuster, as designed by Reich in 1952, is the application of those laws. One of those laws is that orgone energy is strongly attracted to water. Another is that DOR, the stagnant, toxic form of orgone, is even more strongly attracted to water than is the motile, healthy form of orgone. And another is that it is the build-up of DOR in the atmosphere that underlies droughts, and desert-formation.
To restore normal rainfall patterns in a drought-stricken area, the DOR that is the cause of the drought must be drained off and disposed of. The cloudbuster does exactly that,. The metal tubes act as a conduit, and the water into which the tubes are grounded acts to attract the DOR from the atmosphere through the tubes into the water. The principle is so simple it is almost impossible to misunderstand it.
Nevertheless, some people do somehow manage to accomplish that incredible intellectual feat. And they proceed to add all sorts of charms to the cloudbuster in an effort to improve the effectiveness of it. They incorporate cones, pyramids, magnets, crystals, and other new-age junk into the design, thinking they are inventing brilliant improvements on the cloudbuster. The fact that none of this increases the attraction of water for orgone or DOR in the sky, or the ability of tubes to form a conduit, does not occur to them.
Another such failure to grasp the principles underlying cloudbusting is the attempt to eliminate the need to ground a cloudbuster into water. Some people have thought that if the tubes were connected to an orgone accumulating device instead of to water, that would suffice. Others have thought that some favored geometrical shape would provide attraction and allow the elimination of water grounding. Still others have thought that if the tubes were in motion, with power provided by some kind of motor, the result would be an effective cloudbuster despite a lack of any connection to water.
Needless to say, none of these innovations has ever done anything except serve to add additional excitation to the already over-excited atmosphere, ultimately leading to complications and more problems.
And then there are those whose creative genius and inventiveness leads them to claim the cloudbuster does not draw energy at all, but projects it instead. They think the cloudbuster somehow is a source of ¨''beams'' of energy ''shooting out'' from it into the atmosphere. Some of them think the water the cloudbuster is grounded into is the source of this energy and that the tubes of a cloudbuster, when inserted into the water, somehow ''break free'' the energy contained in the water, and it is then ''shot forth'' into the air through the tubes.
And if that was not enough to be wrong about, they then proceed to use newer models that dispense with water-grounding, leaving them without any explanation of where the energy they think is being ''shot out'' by the tubes is coming from. Apparently they think some geometrical shapes can create orgone energy from nothing.
And when they build their ''new, improved'' model of the cloudbuster, they somehow manage to convince themselves it is working. Part of this is due to what is called
In the case of an atmospheric system, when the atmosphere is highly-charged it is in a state of expansion and the weather will be clear and dry. When there is a discharge, there will be rapid contraction, followed closely by rain. Normally, the atmosphere pulsates, expanding and contracting regularly, with regular rainfall as a result. DOR inhibits this cycle, and can cause the process to become stuck at either stage of the pulsation, with chronic expansion causing drought, and a lasting contraction causing floods.
Any form of irritation by secondary energies such as radioactivity or electrical current, especially high-voltage alternating current, will make the atmosphere expand. If there is a drought, there is already a state of chronic expansion, and the added excitation of an electrical device will increase the expansion. Up to the point of the system's capacity. Then there will be a discharge, characterized by a sudden, sharp contraction, or a series of contractions, resulting in rain. Frequently, excessive rain, far more than would ever fall normally in that region.
This sometimes gives the impression of being able to ''bring rain'' by means of some electromagnetic device or some other device that creates excitation, such as a moving orgone accumulator, which becomes excited by fast passage through the orgone field of the earth, and in turn, excites that ambient field by rapid passage through it.
But the rain, even if far more than would be normal or desireable for that area, does not end the drought problem. Eventually, the rain will stop as the contraction levels off, and then the drought will resume. Droughts do not ''just happen''. They are caused by build-up of DOR, and unless the DOR is removed, the drought will continue.
So a device that uses a moving orgone accumulator will only add to the already excessive excitation, causing a temporary break in the drought by over-exciting the atmosphere until it contracts in reaction, but since it does not draw off the DOR that is the cause of the drought into a body of water, the break will be only temporary, even when the amount of rain is more than normal, and the drought will resume.
So if someone makes a claim to have invented an improvement on the original basic design of the cloudbuster, and that improvement consists of some geometrical shape that is allefged to ''shoot out'' orgone energy, or of a moving orgone accumulator or accumulators, spinning around but not connected to any body of water, and not acting as a conduit to conduct atmospheric DOR to water, and if the device is made to move by means of an electrical motor, anyone familiar with basic orgone physics would know instantly what that device does and how it does it.
And what any such device does, is to excite the atmosphere into an even greater state of expansion, until it reacts by contracting sharply, which will only cause rain to fall, but will not solve a drought problem. What it will do, in fact, is make the long-term drought problem worse. There will still be a local infestation of DOR, and the atmospheric orgone will be further weakened and less able to contract by itself the next time. The next episode of drought will last longer as a result of such an ill-advised inteervention.
Proper cloudbusting would be to do DOR-removal, restoring the ability of the atmosphere to pulsate normally, and produce rain at more or less regular intervals. For that, it is necessary to provid a conduit to draw DOR down out of the sky into a body of water. This is a conclusion reached by fiollowing the basic laws of orgione energy. And it is not going to change.
No new invention will ever be invented that enables cloudbusting to be done properly without the cloudbuster being grounded into water. No new invention will ever be invented that uses some geometrical shapes to ''shoot out'' any ''beams'' of orgone energy. Nobody is ever going to solve a drought problem, which is caused by build-up of DOR in the atmosphere, by over-exciting the already over-expanded atmosphere to the point of collapse into a state of contraction. All that can be done that way is to ''make rain'', which does not solve the drought. It just makes it worse.
And anyone who thinks they have a better way to do cloudbusting needs to go back to grade school and study how orgone energy functions. We do not need any better cloudbusters. What we need is better operators.
We need more knowledge of how the atmospheric energy behaves, both in it's normal state, and when it is behaving pathologically as a result of DOR. It is there, in the study of the behavior of the atmosphere, to improve the knowledge and techniques of the operator, not in some ''new, improved'' gadget, that advances in cloudbusting will be made.