Cloudbusters Causing Climate Breakdown

Cloudbusters  Are  Now  In  Second  Place  As  A  Cause  Of  Climate  Breakdown  And  Atmospheric  Destabilization.  Most  Of  The  Deterioration  In  Climate   Stability  That  Is  Conventionally  Being  Ascribed  To  Greenhouse  Gases  Is  In  Fact  Being  Caused  By  Backyard  Hobbyists  Playing  With  Cloudbusters.


1. Water vapor is around 100 times as efficient as a greenhouse gas as CO2 is, and there is at least 100 times as much of it in the atmoasphere, so the net greenhouse effect from water vapor is at least 10,000 times as great as that of CO2. And since the normal variation in the amount of water vapor is more than 15% from any one year to another, any contribution from CO2 would be lost in the background and undetectable.

2. Plants take up CO2 and in sealed greenhouses, with extra CO2 pumped in, they grow bigger and faster. If there were actually more  CO2 in the air today than there was 50 years ago, any old farmer or gardener would tell you his plants are growing bigger now than they did 50 years ago. Since there has been no noticeable increase in plant growth, there has been no increase in CO2,  no matter what the scientists may claim their instruments measure.

3. Moose in New England are moving south. In colonial times, they were found as far south as central New Jersey, but starting in the 1840s, at the end of the Little Ice Age, when the climate became warmer than it had been for the last 400 years, they moved north and when I was growing up in New England, they were found only in Maine and the far north of Vermont and New Hampshire. Now, for the last 30 years, they have been moving south and are now permanent residents in Mass. and have been seen as far south as New Jersey.

The reason is that there is a small fly that gets into their ears and drives them crazy. They stay to the north of its' range. When the climate warmed up in the 1840s, the fly expanded north and the moose moved north to stay away from it. So if the moose are moving south again, that fly is contracting its' range southward, and they are now again able to follow it south.

So the climate, at least during the part of the year in which these flies breed, is getting COLDER, not warmer. And I simply do not care how many scientists say otherwise or what their reasons for saying it might be. They are wrong. And if all the so-called "scientists" on earth say one thing and the moose tell me the opposite, I will trust the moose, not modern science.

The whole issue of climate destabilization has been so politicized that nothing reported in the scientific journals can be trusted. And there is no scientific consensus, no matter what the claims are to the contrary. But even if there was a consensus, science is not a democracy and the question of who is right cannot ever be settled by a vote. It can only be settled by citing the EVDENCE, not by citing the numbers of scientists who believe it. It is entirely possible for 100% of all scientists to be dead wrong on some issue. That has happened many times.

Any scientist who thinks the climate is gettting warmer is simply going according to a theory and ignoring the evidence. The greenhouse gases theory is wrong, but it happens to be the only theory they know of, so they go with it in spite of evidence to the contrary.

Most climate scientists today do not even look at any evidence outside their offices. What they look at are computer print-outs. They do almost all their work with computer models, not observations of the natural world outside their windows. And a computer model is only as good as the assumptions they put into it.

They see changes happening in climate. That is true. And they see that the changes match the growth in numbers and industrial activity of humans. That is also true. And they see the match in time as evidence that there is a cause and effect relationship between climate changes and human activities. That is also true.

 But then they make a typical mistake that is very common in science. They do not know any way to explain how human actions could be causing the climate changes except the greenhouse gases theory, so they conclude that it must be greenhouses gases that are causing the climate changes.

They are wrong. The bulk of the climate collapse is being caused by oranur effects. Oranur is caused by radioactivity. It is caused by electromagnetic technology. It is augmented by deforestation and daming rivers and ploughing and paving and over-grazing, all of which interfere with the natural re-processing of the DOR which is the long-term residue of oranur back into healthy, motile living energy. In short, there is an orgonomic explanation for the observed climate collapse that does not depend on the CO2-acting-as-greenhouse-gas theory.

The climate is changing. But it is not getting warmer. It is also not getting colder. What it is doing is getting warmer and colder. It is getting wetter and drier. In short, it is getting more random. It is getting more variable. It is getting more chaotic and fluctuating more widely. It is going to extremes. It is pulsating more rapidly and with greater amplitude.

On a statistical graph, this will look as if things are normal because a very hot summer and a very cold winter average out to a normal year. A very warm winter and a cool summer will also average out to a normal year. So to a scientist, with the usual mechanistic fixation on numbers, there will have been a normal year, while to any living organism, there will have been two disasters instead of one.

Most of of what is being attributed to global warming and blamed on greenhouse effect from extra CO2 in the air is really due to oranur, and its' after-effect, DOR. Most of that is from the use of radioactivity, both civilian and military. The rest is from electrical technology and bad land use practices like deforestation. If there is a component from industral pollution, it is a very small one, probably less than that from forest fires.

The direct biological effects of radioactivity have been intensively studied, and are well-known, even if not as well understood. But the meteorological effects have not been studied by anyone except Reichians and one physicist I spoke to once in Lithuania, whose work has not been published in English, and he told me he has not been able to get funding to do more research on the subject since 1988.

The second most important contribution to climate breakdown, after oranur, is cloudbusting. A single cloudbuster has a range of hundreds, sometimes thousands, of kilometers. In fact, the long-range effects can sometimes be global in extent. And there are now hundreds, possibly even thousands, of cloudbusters around.

 Cloudbusters are the second most important form of atmospheric pollution after oranur. They are the second most important reason for climate destabilization. And they are growing in numbers at so rapid a rate that they could even surpass the nuclear industry in the near future in terms of the damage done to the environment, at least as far as direct meteorological damage, though probably not yet in terms of long-term biological damage. And so far, nobody except the few people on this list is even aware of the problem.

And while there is an hysterical world-wide politicized movement of unscientific global warming pushers promoting the false claim that a greenhouse effect from combustion-produced gases is causing climate changes, nobody except the people who read this are going to do anything about the cloudbuster problem that is the real cause of much of the climate destabilization.

Joel Carlinsky
( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )
joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com

Cirrus clouds and the DOR Ceiling

Cirrus cloud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the last few decades, actually beginning in 1945, at the start of the Atomic Age, there has been an increase in the amount and / or frequency of high-altitude thin cloud cover. Such high thin clouds now often fill the entire sky and sometimes for days at a time.

This high thin haze was described in the 1950s by Reich in his account of his trip across America to Arizona. He attributed it to the atomic bomb testing program which at that time was setting off atomic bombs in the atmosphere on a weekly basis. According to Reich, the  atmospheric energy continuum which underpins both the movement of the atmosphere and its' chemical composition, was being affected by the intense radioactivity from the bombs and the haze and stagnation was the result.

Reich found by his cloudbuster operations in Arizona that he was better able to  remove this stagnated condition when he took his cloudbuster up into the mountains, where he could  aim down at the cloud cover instead of aiming up at it from the valley floor. He was impressed enough by the advantage of elevation that when he returned to the East Coast, he consulted with an engineer from the Sikorsky helicopter company in Connecticut about the possibility of doing cloudbusting from a helicopter, but at the time, there was no helicopter capable of lifting a large enough tank of water to enable cloudbusting from the air.

After his death, during the Viet Nam war, larger helicopters were built, which could lift a tank of water weighing several tons, enough to connect a cloudbuster to. But by that time, the DOR-ceiling over most of the United States had risen too high for a helicopter to get above it. The average altitude of large area contiguous DOR over North America was around 5,000 ft ( 1524 meters ) in Reichs' time, and is now around 40,000 ft. ( 12,192 meters ), which happens to be about the usual altitude of commercial jet aircraft on long-haul flights.

The apparent cause of the increase in DOR and the increase in height and extent of the DOR ceiling, is the great amount of radioactivity from decades of nuclear bombs, nuclear reactors, re-processing of nuclear fuel rods, and other radioactive industrial processes, along with the large increase in electromagnetic equipment in use, including radar, microwave trasmissions, and high-voltage powerlines. Adding to the amount of DOR in the atmosphere are the reductions in the natural ability to re-mobilize DOR caused by deforestation, the damming of large rivers, and the denuding of large areas of the earths' surface by livestock grazing, agriculture, and urban sprawl.

The spread of DOR across the visible sky has therefore become almost contiguous, with very little natural, healthy sky still visible in many places for much of the time. This has not gone unnoticed by both meteorologists and the public. Not surprisingly, since so few people are aware of the findings of Reich and the developments that have followed in the field of orgonomy in more recent decades, there are theories that have been developed to explain the change in the amount of high thin cloud cover, and those theories are wide of the mark.

The common theory in meteorology holds that in order for a raindrop to form from water vapor in the atmosphere, there must first be a tinty particle of solid material for the vapor to condense around. This theory is called the "condensation nucleus" theory. According to it, each and every single raindrop must form around a solid particle, and if no particles are present, no raindrops can form.

It is this theory that forms the theoretical basis for the practice of "cloudseeding", which consists of releasing large amounts of tiny particles into the air, either from an aircraft or from a burrner on the ground, to provide the needed condensation nuclei for water vapor to condense on and form raindrops. Silver iodine is the prefered  particlulate matter because it is considered the best size of crystal to condense water vapor.

The main theory proposed by meteorologists to explain the increase in thin, high-altitude cloud cover is that there has been an increase in visible clouds because of the ice crystals formed by the water vapor in the contrails of jet aircraft flying at those elevations.

Cirrus cloud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are several serious problems with this theory, however. Anyone who has ever watched as a cloudbuster fills the formerly clear sky with clouds can testify that clouds can form without any particulates for them to condense around. The cloudbuster does not put out any particulates of anything.

 In fact, several meteorologists have told me that since the cloudbuster does not create any particles for water vapor to condense on, it could not possibly create clouds. In their view, I must be mistaken. I could not possibly have seen what I tell them I saw because the conensation nucleus theory requires a large number of tiny particles to be present in the air for condensation of water vapor into raindrops to take place.

So, instead of changing the theory to fit the eyewitness testimony, the "scientists" would rather refuse to accept the evidence because of their theory. Needless to say, since I was there and I know what I saw, and they were not there, and did not see it, I consider them, not I, to be mistaken.

But there is reason even for one unaware of cloudbusting to disbelieve the condensation nucleus theory. If you fly a small aircraft through a cloud, the windscreen will get wet. Fly out the other side of the cloud, and the water will soon evaporate, leaving it clean, not streaked with dust as it would be if the cloud was full of dust particles.

Hold a glass microscope slide in a rain, catch raindrops on it, and place the slide under the microscope. Do you see any tiny particles in the center of each raindrop? I did this and found no particles in most raindrops. So I am skeptical of the theory that every raindrop must have condensed around a particle of solid material in the atmosphere.

So for several good reasons, I consider the condensation nucleus theory to be wrong and the alternative, orgonomic, theory, that rain is formed by the merger of energy streams in the atmosphere, to be proven by the frequent observation that altering the energetic parameters of the atmospghere will cause clouds and rain to form.

And from that it follows that the theory of high-altitude thin cloud cover being formed by condensation on ice crystals from jet aircraft contrails is also wrong. What is being seen in the sky and taken for clouds of water condensing on ice crystals is really nothing of the kind. It is what Reich refered to as the "DOR ceilling".

 And it is a haze, a stagnation of the atmospheric energy that can look "glaring" and "white" at a distance and under strong lighting conditions. It is caused by the dying of the planetary energy field due to continual assault by technologies that expose it to intense secondary energies, nuclear and electromagnetic, along with the reduction in the capacity of the earth to absorb and recover from such assaults.

It is therefore ironic that some people are refering to these high, thin sheets of DOR, which appear to be clouds, as "man-made clouds", which is certainly correct, but meaning it in a very different way. They are not thinking these clouds are caused by DOR, or that man is indeed creating them by his nuclear and electrical industries, augmented by his devastation of the natural recovery systems of the earth through bad land use practices. They are instead thinking these clouds are "man made" because they are being formed by the contrails from high-flying aircraft.

And, according to one of my correspondents, there have been some cases of people who have no idea what they are doing, thinking the DOR cover they see is created by aircraft contrails, are trying to disipate it with woefully inadequate home-made toy versions of the cloudbuster.

 In their ignorance, they are making a bad situation worse by using poorly designed, poorly grounded equipment that will excite the atmosphere into an even greater state of chronic expansion, leading to intensifying and prolonging any drought tendencies that already exist in their areas.

A properly done, fully-funded cloudbusting program on a global scale could still reverse the decline in the atmospheric energy field and keep this planet habitable for a time, perhaps even long enough to bring the Atomic Age to an end. But poorly designed home-built equipment in the hands of hobbyists pointing it at the sky at random, without any co-operation between them and without any basic understanding of the energetic functioning of the atmosphere will only make things worse.

And they are bad enough already without any more cloudbuster-game players playing their silly games with the atmosphere.

This Is The Planet Of The Worms

This Is The Planet Of The Worms---And We Had Better Realize How Important They Are

Invention is the mother of necessity. For every invention, there is an equal and opposite problem created. The impression one is taught in school, of a steady line of inventions being added to the list, each one a solution to a problem that existed previously and was solved by that invention, is a false one. The facts are that every invention has both advantages and drawbacks, and usually, the advantages are seen and the drawbacks ignored untill it is too late to avoid them.

A good example is the horsecollar. It came into common use in Europe in the late Middle Ages, long after oxen were used to plow fields, which started in early antiquity. An ox can pull a plough with a rope around its' neck, but a horse would choke if that was tried. The invention of a way to shift the weight from the neck to the shoulders of a horse meant it could be used to pull a plough. And since a horse is much faster than an ox, that meant a much larger area of land could be cultivated in a day by the same number of workers.

So food production boomed. And large areas of forest were cleared for farming. And the population of Europe boomed. And the cycle repeated itself, with ever-more people and ever more land being cleared to feed them. So most of the land of Europe was cleared. And there were extinctions of most of the large animals of Europe. And the larger population caused crowded conditions that led to plagues that killed many of the people.

And there were wars fought that would never have been fought in the days when the population was much smaller. And there were expeditions to other continents to size control of resources. So there was slavery and colonization and genocide. And much of the bloody history of the past several centuries was written because of the horsecollar.

Now, there is another invention being claimed to be a boon for food production. The cloudbuster. It is being said that with this invention, it will be possible to bring the deserts of the world under cultivation. The people promoting this idea say this will make possible the feeding of the ever-growing population of those poor countries. And they say this would be a good thing for the people of those countries.

There are some reasons to question their assumptions, however. They could start by looking at what types of farming the increased water in the desert would make possible.

Because it would certainly not be organic farming or farming of traditional crops by traditional methods. The addition of water to desert sand does not always mean fertile soil. The sand, with water added, still needs a lot of organic material mixed in with it to be able to support more than the hardy pioneer species that recolonize areas that have been devastated by something like a forest fire, cultivation, or desert conditions that may have lasted for centuries. The less hardy species will have to wait until the soil has been prepared for them by the pioneer plants that can grow under less benevolent conditions.

 The real tillers of the soil are the earthworms, which form a majority of the biomass of this planet, and whose ceaseless activity is the basis of all plant growth on earth. Unless the worm population is big enough, the newly irrigated desert land will remain a useless waste of hardy crabgrass-like species, unable to develop further until recolonization by worms has taken place.

How long would that take? It depends on the size of the area that must be recolonized. In the case of the Sahara, an area about the size of the continental United States, it could take several centuries from the time there was sufficient rainfall to support climax  vegetation until there was a soil that could fully contribute to that growth. Worms would have to slowly spread from around the edges to the interior of the newly moist area until they met in the center. Then, after there was an initial worm mass in the soil, it would still take many years until the worm population had increased enough to render the soil ferrtile enough to be able to support a climax vegetation.

But since humans cannot be expected to wait that long, they would have to add artificial fertilizers to the soil instead. And those fertilizers would have to be made in factories from oil. And they are expensive. So the project would have to be large enough for the loans it would need to be made available. 

And the cost of the loans and fertilizers would have to be paid in money earned from export of food grown on the formerly desert land. And since that would require loans from international banks and investments by overseas investors, those investors and banks would be the owners of the project. And that would mean the benefits of the project for the local population would end up being a lot less than the promoters think they would be.

The cloudbuster is not a quick fix for all problems. As long as the present social and economic system is in place, no matter who does what with a cloudbuster, the same people who now own the world will own whatever benefits result. And the same people who do not own the world at present will still have to pay for anything that goes wrong.

And if history is any guide, something will.