Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Cloudbusting And Cattle-Grazing


Droughts have always been frequent in the Western United States, and in recent years they have been more frequent and lasting longer than was historically to be expected. That is not too surprising.

The atomic bomb testing program in the 1950s and early 60s, in which the United States was attacked by the United States government with nuclear weapons more that 1,000 times, and the widespread use of nuclear reactors to generate electricity ever since then, now employing more than 100 reactors, has resulted in a significant increase in DOR in the environment.

 An increase in droughts is only one of the inevitable results and unless a well-conceived cloudbusting program is instituted, can be expected to continue as long as the technological use of radioacxtivity continues.

Much of the West had already been under assault by another devastating form of attack for the past several hundred years, especially in the past 160 years or so. The introduction of cattle ranching, first by the invaders from Spain starting in the 16th century, and then by the American invaders who followed them in the 19th, has had a horrendous effect on the ecology of the entire West.

 In addition to the direct devastation from the grazing itself, there are side-effects that do at least as much damage, including the deliberate extermination of predators by a government agency in the service of the cattle ranchers to protect the cattle, the construction of fences that prevent wildlife from following their normal instinctive migratory routes to more available food supplies in winter, and the drawing down of the water table by the numerous wells dug to provide water for cattle at places where no surface water is supposed to be.

The recent increase in frequency and severity of droughts has sometimes led to the understandable but naive suggestion that cloudbusters could be used to end the droughts and restore better climate conditions. That is perfectly true. The droughts are caused by build-up of DOR and it would be possible to reverse that trend with proper cloudbusting over a period of time. And since droughts have a harmful impact on nearly all forms of life in a drought-stricken region, from a strictly atmospheric standpoint, DOR-removal would be the right thing to do.

Unfortunately, things are a bit more complicated than that. The droughts, if they are severe enough and last long enough, can be expected to drive the cattle ranchers into bankruptcy and force them out of business. If a drought is ended by cloudbusting, the ranchers will survive to continue their attack on the West by raising cattle.

Droughts are indeed bad for all living things, but in many cases, cattle ranching is almost as bad, and often harder to get rid of. In the case of the current drought situation in the Southwestern United States, it would be foolish to employ a cloudbuster to end the drought, only to thereby inadvertantly protect the cattle ranchers from insolvency.

 If the drought is allowed to go on long enough to drive the ranchers out of business, and then a cloudbusting program used to restore normal conditions, the benefits of such a delay would be greater than the harm from the greater duration of the drought. The elimination of the cattle industry would be a huge gain for the region and the eventual ecological recovery would be far more complete than if the drought were ended prematurely and the ranchers left in place to continue their assault on the land.

This is an example of the kind of wholistic examination of the issues that is needed in the cloudbusting field to take all relevant factors into account, not only metorological ones, but social and economic factors as well.

The following link will provide background information  to back up my contention that cloudbusting to end a drought in a region already under attack by cattle ranching should be delayed until the drought itself has ended the rancher's destructive attack on the ecosystem.



(US) Grazing Retirment Legislation on Daily Kos
    Posted by: "Mike Hudak" mikehudak@binghamtonwireless.com mike_hudak
    Date: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:53 pm ((PST))

The Rural Economic Vitalization Act
(<http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112hr3432>HR 3432),
recently introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, would
enable the voluntary retirement of federal grazing permits. Where
ranching would cease, significant improvement in wildlife habitat
would follow.

Read my article about the legislation at

<http://www.dailykos.com/blog/uid:330629>http://www.dailykos.com/blog/uid:330629

Those of you on Facebook, I encourage to "Like" the article. Thanks.

Please forward.
--

Mike Hudak, PhD
Chair, Sierra Club Grazing Committee
Director, Public Lands Without Livestock
Author, WESTERN TURF WARS

38 Oliver Street
Binghamton, NY 13904-1542

Phone:            (607) 240-5225
Skype:            mikehudak
Personal website: http://mikehudak.com
Biome Books:      http://biomebooks.com
Sierra Club:      http://sc.org/grazing-team
Facebook:         http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106170074385&ref=search
Wikipedia:        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Hudak
YouTube videos:   http://www.youtube.com/user/MJHudak1952?feature=mhum
Yahoo Email:      mailto:mike_hudak@yahoo.com
Gmail:            mailto:mike.hudak@gmail.com


Blog Archive