Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.


In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.

In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.

The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.

About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Cloudbusters, Airplanes, And The Law

I keep hearing from Libertarian ideologues who tell me they want to see the earth protected, but disaprove of using the government and legal system as a means of doing that. They usually advocate sticking to some other tactics, ranging from moral persuasion and setting a good example, to asassination, instead of resorting to laws and law enforcement to protect the environment.

There are many people who build their own airplanes at home and fly them for pleasure. The FAA has set rules about this. You can build your own airplane, so long as the plans you are using are of a model certified as airworthy by the FAA, but at certain fixed stages during the construction, it must be inspected by an FAA inspector. When it is finished, you must have it inspected by an FAA-certified mechanic before you can fly it. And of course, you must have a license to fly a plane.

I started taking flying lessons at the age of 15, so I tend to pay attention to anything I read or hear that concerns small aircraft.  And in all the time since, I have heard of only one case of someone building and flying airplanes illegally, without bothering to comply with the FAA regulations and without having a license. In fact, most home-builders are proud to have the FAA certify their work as good enough to fly and the certification is as eagerly sought after for that seal of approval and feeling of satisfaction as for the right to actually fly the aircraft.

The same goes for many private pilots who have no interest in working as pilots, but go on after getting a private pilots' license to add more ratings and get a commercial license because of the pride it brings them and the higher level of confidence they feel from having been able to qualify for it.

For some reason, the cloudbusting field is different. People who learn about cloudbusting, most often nowadays from the internet, frequently just build themselves a cloudbuster without ever even trying to contact anyone with expertise in the field to learn anything more about it than the sparse information, usually mostly misinformation, they can find on-line.

Then, with their frequently sub-standard equipment, often poorly designed and poorly constructed, they proceed to try it out, again without bothering to try to learn anything except the inadequate and usually wrong information on-line about how to use it. If any unlicensed person built and proceeded to fly an uninspected home-made aircraft with such a cavalier attutude, they would be commonly regarrded as reckless to the point of being suicidally insane.

And a cloudbuster is as hazardous to the health of the operator as an airplane can be, and the risk to uninvolved people on the ground is much greater. If your homebuilt aircraft crashes, chances are, only the pilot will be injured or killed, and at most, only a few people on the ground, but a mistake with a cloudbuster can kill hundreds, and impoverish thousands.

So, why do intending pilots and intending cloudbuster operators take such very different approaches to preparations for their sport? Why do we hear of so few cases of unlicensed pilots flying home-built aircraft, and so many of untrained operators using home made cloudbusters?

Why do most of the people who want to fly small airplanes as a hobby take pride in their ability to qualify for a pilots' license and are happy to see the FAA inspector come and take a look at their home-built aircraft to tell them if they are doing a good job, while most of the people who want to take up cloudbusting are strongly resistant to the idea of government regulation of cloudbusting and licensing of operators in the field?

Part of this tendency may be due to the unfortunate history of the cloudbuster and its' undeserved image as somehow connected with unorthodoxy, rebelliousness, and suspicion of government authority. Perhaps if the cloudbuster had been invented by some big university lab, patented and immediately put to widespread commercial use for a high price, and accepted at once by the scientific community, the anarchists and anti-government ideologists would never have bothered with it.

They do not seem to spend much time building their own illegal TV transmiters and broadcasting illegally. They seldom construct their own airplanes and fly them without FAA certification. But for some reason, the very people who distrust government the most seem to also be the people most often attracted to cloudbusting, and by their frequent refusal to conduct themselves according to ordinary standards of decent and responsible behavior in the field, make government regulation of cloudbusting more urgently needed than it would be otherwise.

There are plenty of grounds for distrusting the courts and the legislative process, but at this time in history there is no effective substitute. Either we shall have laws to protect the environment, and strict enforcement of those laws, or the environment shall not be protected.

This fact is universally recognized in the environmental movement, but somehow, when it comes to the people who have an interest in cloudbusting, it frequently seems to be disparaged in favor of libertarian and anarchist ideology. Or, rather, people with such ideologies, a relatively small proportion of the total population, seem dispropotionately attracted to cloudbusting.

In working on plans to address the dangers to the environment from cloudbuster proliferation, we have been concentrating on plans for lobbying for more and stronger laws to hold cloudbuster operators to higher standards, and stricter enforcement of laws already on the books that could be used against cloudbuster operators who fail to meet those standatrds.

We have also discussed ways, such as Citizens' Arrest Committees to make legal Citizens' Arrests, by which those laws could legally be enforced by private individuals and groups in cases where the law enforcement authorities fail to realize the seriousness of the problem and fail to take action.

What we will NOT do is surrender the most powerful tool to protect the atmosphere, the power of the legal system to punish violators, on the altar of libertarian anti-government ideology.

Those ideologues who try to tell us "it is wrong to resort to the state and its' courts" as one correspondent put it, will be disapointed in our response. Urging us to use some other, less effective, methods instead of "the state and its' courts" is nothing but a form of attack on the atmosphere since if we were ever so misguided as to yield to this argument, we would have no chance of preventing the enormous damage cloudbusters can do to the life support systems of the earth.

We need every tool in the toolbox, and the legal system, flawed and often unjust as it is,  is one of the most important tools we have. Like every other group working to preserve and protect this planet, we intend to make full use of it.

Blog Archive