Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Total Pageviews

Friday, December 2, 2011

PLEASE HELP STOP WILDCAT CLOUDBUSTING

My teacher, the late Eva Reich, frequently used to use the term, "wildcat cloudbusting" to describe undisciplined and unco-ordinated cloudbusting by untrained and unskilled operators who often knew little or nothing about the scientific principles behind the functioning of the cloudbuster, and as often as not, did not care. The term has recently taken on more urgent importance, as the field has mushroomed and more and more people all over the world are being introduced to cloudbusting via the internet, with virtually no chance to learn the facts upon which it is based.

Attempting cloudbusting without extensive study of orgone biophysics is unlikely to yield good results, and attempting cloudbusting without a good grounding in the biological sciences, especially ecology, is almost certain to produce more trouble than benefits. Any cloudbusting project should only be undertaken after a detailed examination of the proposed operations by an ecologist familiar with the region.

The most important thing to learn in the course of one's education in this field is not how to do cloudbusting. It is how NOT to do cloudbusting: the mistakes and errors to avoid and how to recognize and avoid them. Only after learning how to avoid causing a disaster is it safe to begin the process of learning what to do to obtain desired results.


Cloudbusting cannot be taught via the internet. Most of what an operator really needs to learn is internal: how to see and, more importantly, FEEL what is going on in the atmosphere. It is more a question of proprioceptive sensations and how to recognize and interpet them that of any intellectual information that can be stated in words. Instruction must include hands-on training, under close supervision by someone who can observe the student and knows what body language and physiological reactions to look for.

Even with hands-on instruction from a qualified instructor, few adults can learn cloudbusting properly. The best students in cloudbusting, as with many other subjects, such as languages or gymnastics, are children. And cloudbusting has more in common with gymnastics or riding a bicycle than with the study of academic subjects like physics or meteorology. 

In fact, the very people who are most attracted to the study of fields like physics or meteorology are the worst students when it comes to cloudbusting. The fields from which the best adult students come are artists, because they are used to noticing slight changes in coloring and light intensity in the sky that most people miss, animal trainers and kndergarden teachers, who are used to dealing with the unpredictability of living systems, and active members of the neo-Pagan religious movement, who are indoctrinated in an ideology of respect for nature and natural processes more than members of the mainstream Judeo-Christian culture or the mechanistic sciences. 

So it is ironic that the cloudbuster is being intensely promoted on websites geared to technology-buffs, invention-freaks, and hard-science types with an interest in physics, engineering, and inovative technologies. People in those fields are unlikely to know much of the biological sciences, and cloudbusting really is more a part of the biological sciences than of physics, which is the study of inanimate matter. 

For all the faults and shortcomings of modern mechanistic biology, biologists, even the most mechanistic of them, are far better qualified to work in the cloudbusting field than physicists or engineers. The end result of any cloudbusting operation, after all, is not how many centimeters of rain fall, as measured by a rain gage, but what it does to the living vegetation and animal life on the ground. A botanist is better qualified to evaluate the results of an operation than a meteorologist who usually will not even think of conducting a botanical study to determine his degree of success.

People from a background in the "hard sciences" like physics and engineering predominate in the on-line unorthodox or "alternative" science subculture, and the websites of this segment of the population are full of incitement to take up cloudbusting. A great deal of this incitement is fueled by a rather paranoid complex of irrational fears and complex conspiracy theories that no reasonable person could take seriously. But there are others who advocate what they think are sensible goals, like "scientific research" or "ending droughts" and the irrationality of these people is less obvious.

At first glace, it may seen reasonable to suggest using cloudbusters to end a devastating drought, for example, but to simply post information on how to build a cloudbuster on a website and tell whoever reads it to just "go out and end the drought" is not going to do anyone any good. If more than one person followed such advice, the results could be catastrophic.

Several cloudbusters operating in the same area, with none of the operators aware of the others, and none of them having any idea what to do with the equipment once they had constructed it, would be a perfect recipie for chaos. And if none of them knew how to recognize changes they were causing in the atmosphere as they started to happen, instead of having to wait until results became too obvious to be misinterpeted, when it would be too late to stop in time to avoid excessive rains and flooding, the chances of anything other than disaster would negligible. .

Yet there are websites that have posted exactly that suggestion and urged an unknown number of unknown people to build cloudbusters and deploy them without any information being made available on even the simplest basics of how to use a cloudbuster or how to know when to stop the operation. It is incredible that anyone can fail to see the problems involved with such an approch.

But someone does. Jerry Decker, a well-known advocate of new and inovative inventions and technologies, operator of the prominent website, http://www.keelynet.com , has several times recently recommended to his readership that they build cloudbusters and "go out and end the drought" in his native state of Texas. He posts links to a report of a cloudbusting operation of his own, conducted several years ago in Mexico, and to exact detailed instructions illustrating how to build a cloudbuster, but gives virtually no information on how to use it or what safety precautions to take or how to avoid any of the numerous problems that can happen in the course of an operation.

When Jerry was admonished for these and other omissions in his on-line advocacy of promiscuous cloudbusting by untrained individuals acting in an information vacuum, he responded with defensive anger and aggression, refusing to admit any faults in his policy of promoting cloudbusting for the masses.

Jerry can be reached at

  jdecker@keelynet.com

Please write to him and explain to him why you think he should refrain from inciting cloudbuster proliferation and wildcat cloudbusting.

And please send me a copy of your e-mail to him and any reply you receive. Thank you.

Joel Carlinsky
( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )
joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com



Posted by at

Blog Archive