Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

ARE CLOUDBUSTERS CONTRIBUTING TO THE DROUGHT IN TEXAS?

  I keep hearing there is a bad drought in Texas. Could it be a lot of news media hype? Could it be that it is not a shortfall of normal water supply, but over-use by too many consumers? Are underground water tables being drained for irrigation? Are growing populations in the cities using too much water?

All of these could be reported in the news as a "drought". It is important to remember that a news report of a drought does not necessarily mean there is really less than normal rainfall.

But if there really is a shortage of rainfall, there are several distinct possible causes. There could be an infestation of DOR in the area. That is the classical cause of drought, and the  most frequent reason for a drought. It is caused by collapse of the regional atmospheric orgone energy into a stagnant state, known as DOR because of exposure to radioactivity, such as long-range effects of a nuclear meltdown in a place as distant as Japan, for example.

DOR clouds from that incident have gone around the world and can become anchored at a place where they encounter an already-existing DOR concentration, and will then remain and cause a drought, often complicated by a reaction of the remaining healthy energy in the regional atmosphere trying to restore energetic mobility by high winds, tornadoes, and other appropriate, health-giving responses to the stagnation.

Or there could be a DOR barrier someplace upstream, possibly a long distance away, blocking ingress of moisture into the area. Given that the drought this year in Texas coincided with the worst wildfires in history in Arizona, and that is the direction weather fronts come from that bring rain to Texas, it seems the drought in Texas and the dryness in Arizona are both caused by a single factor, probably a blockage of moisture from the Pacific across the Southwest due to a DOR barrier over Jacumba, California, at the crest of the mountain range that separates the moister coastal region from the drier country inland.

That barrier has existed for several thousand years, waxing and waning from time to time. It was intensified in the  1950s due to the nearby atomic bomb tests, resulting in a series of nation-wide droughts, and was temporarily weakened by cloudbusting during the Reich cloudbusting expedition in Arizona in 1955. It has since returned to it's former intensity, blocking a portion of the summer monsoon rains from reaching Arizon and continuing onward. The recent Japanese meltdown has weakened the flow of atmospheric energy and intensified such barriers all over the world and probably this one has been affected also.

Or there could be a poorly designed cloudbuster engaged in a poorly designed operation. One well-known promoter of technology and invention, Jerry Decker, the owner of the popular Keelynet website, has been urging all and sundry to build cloudbusters and end the drought. This is, of course, totally irresponsible since if anyone took him up on the suggestion and did start operating, they would be ignorant of how to use a cloudbuster properly as well as of the possible operations of any number of others in the same area. Problems worse than the present drought would be almost certain to follow.

But one question that comes to mind is, WHAT MAKES HIM THINK THAT NOBODY IS TRYING CLOUDBUSTING ALREADY? Incompetent cloudbusting can cause a drought, or prolong an already existing one, and with the large number of websites giving instructions on how a cloudbuster can be built, there is a better than even chance that at least one person in the Soutwest, probably several of them, unknown to each other, of course, are already hard at work trying to end the drought with home-made clousdbusters---and making things worse.

A cloudbuster can cause a drought in two ways. One is by setting up a flow of air across the path of aproching wearther fronts, blocking them from moving past it. That is what was unintentionally done once by a group of farmers in Wisconsin, who were drawing from the North to try to bring in cooler air from Canada, and the north-to-south movement of air they had caused was blocking the normal west-to-east motion of fronts from the Pacific toward the East Coast. There was a flood in the Upper Missisippi Valley, caused by the series of storms that got stalled there, while the East was having a drought because the storms were not reaching there. When informed of this unsuspected side-effect of their operations, the immediately stopped operating, and the pile-up of successive storms in the upper Missisippi Valley stopped along with the floods, and the weather systems resumed their normal march to the East Coast, where the drought soon ended.

But the other, and by far the most likely type of faulty cloudbuster operation in a cloudbuster-generated drought situation is that the cloudbuster is either connected to a source of electromagnetic current, or else it is not properly grounded. A poorly grounded or electrically excited cloudbuster will impart added excitation to the atmosphere and exacerbate an existing drought tendency. This has happened on several ocassions and is therefore a matter of observation, not theory.

Given the large number of websites providing instructions on how to build a cloudbuster, and the neglect by nearly all of them to even mention the detail of how to ground it properly after it is built, there are likely to be a number of cloudbusters operating in Texas in an attempt to end the drought, and it is about equally likely that none of them is grounded properly.

There have probably been several individuals in Texas who have tried to break the drought by cloudbusting, using equipment they learned how to construct from searching the internet. In which case, they are virtually certain to do something wrong because none of the numerous websites which describe how to build a cloudbuster tells what to do with it after you have built it.

A correspondent who obviously does not understand anything about cloudbusting recently wrote to me that he sees no evidence of any cloudbusting in Texas. By that, he means it is still not raining there. But that means he thinks anyone doing cloudbusting would be successfull. There is no more reason to expect that than to expect successfull surgery the first time from someone with no medical training. In fact, the lack of rain, the continuation of the drought beyond the time when it would probably have ended otherwise, is itself evidence that something is happening to extend it.

And that something is more likely to be faulty cloudbusting than anything else.


Posted by at

Blog Archive