Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Total Pageviews

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Letter Sent To An Australian Environmental Group






Cloudbuster2.jpg
 
Hello, Oz,

Many years ago, I visited Australia and conducted the first-ever expedition there to use a device called a cloudbuster, shown in the photo above, to break a drought Queensland was experiencing at that time. While I was successful in getting rain, I was not able to convince the Grain-growers Association or the Department Of Primary Industry that I was the cause of the rain.

Today, over 40 years later, I want to call to your attention a serious environmental issue you might not know about yet.

 The recent floods in Queensland were caused by someone in Brisbane fooling around with such a homemade weather-control machine in his backyard. I know just how unbelievable that sounds, but the machine does exist.And there is a long record of serious environmental damage being inflicted on unsuspecting populations by people using it without knowing what they are doing.

At the time of my own early attempts in Queensland, very few people knew anything about the cloudbuster, and little was known of how to use it. Mistakes were made, as would be almost certain to happen in exploring the use of any new technology. Today, much more is known and there is a large and growing body of scientific publications attesting to the effectiveness of this method of intervention in the weather.

 But today, thanks to the internet, and numerous websites posting exact details of how to construct a cloudbuster for a few hundred dollars, there are also several hundred people all over the world building these rather simple machines and fooling around with them in their backyards as a sort of hobby. And almost none of them has the proper training to know how to use them safely.
 
 I have seen evidence that in several parts of the world, thousands of people have died from floods, tornadoes, insect-borne diseases due to increase in mosquitoes from standing water left over from floods caused by cloudbusting, and other side-effects of what some irresponsible, incompetent  hobbyists think they have a right to do with the atmosphere.

So I have started a campaign against the wrongful use of cloudbusters. I am not totally against all cloudbusting. Far from it. I think the cloudbuster is an important invention, perhaps the most important to come along in centuries, and if properly used, with due regard for ecology, could be of enormous value. But used improperly, and without any input from an ecologist, as is far more common these days than the correct use of it, it becomes a major environmental problem.

It is often possible to tell from the weather maps and other public information if someone is using a cloudbuster in an area and if a particular weather event is natural or not. I have set up a blog, www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com and you are invited to take a look at some of the articles I have posted there and learn more about the issue.

 Then, if you think you might want to help do something about this threat to the stability of the Australian weather system, please contact me. I have a number of tactics in mind that a group of activists in Australia could use to put some pressure on the psychopath who caused the floods there and influence him to take up some other hobby.
 
 I also have a mailing list OrgonomicEcology-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk  for discussions of the topic and you would be welcome to join it and take part in discussions of how to deal with this issue.
 
 One possible way to work on it would be through the civil court system, placing financial responsibility for flood damage on the person who caused a flood. In America, there are many commercial weather modification companies, using the older and far less effective method of cloudseeding, and they are required to carry insurance to guarantee compensation for anyone harmed by their activities.
 
I have done some checking on Australian laws that could be considered relevant to cloudbusting. I did not find any specific Federal legislation AGAINST weather modification, but there are several laws AUTHORIZING it for specific programs at specific times and places.

It seems that in Australia, unlike in America, weather modification is required to obtain a speficic legislative act authorizing it  and is otherwise considered to fall under the National Parks and Wildlife Act of 1974, the Wilderness Act of 1987, the Fisheries Management Act of 1994, Threatened Species Act, 1995, Local Government Act, 1993, Protection of the Environment Operations Act, 1997, and Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.

Any weather modification done without a legislative act exempting it from these Acts is a violation of them. But since the Crown Prosecutor''s office are reluctant to initiate criminal  prosecutions due in large part to the common misconception that nothing can be done to influence the weather, a civil suit in the civil court system is an alternative that should be explored.

For that, I cannot do much over the internet. I need allies on the ground. So if you are interested in helping protect your country from incompetent, irresponsible use of what would otherwise be a wonderful invention, please take a look at my blog and then let me know. Thank you.

Joel Carlinsky



Posted by at

Blog Archive