Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, March 18, 2011

Weather Magician Defends Sorcerer's Apprentice

I got an unexpected e-mail from David Wells, the leader of an internet-based weather-control club called the Weather Rangers. Ash Palise is a member of that group, and Mr. Wells took it upon himself to defend Ash from my criticisms.

Most of his letter was devoted to expounding his well-known anthropocentric views that natural weather is dangerous and that safety for human life depends on bringing the unruly atmosphere under human control. On this issue I have corresponded with him before, and he knows perfectly well that we do not agree. All efforts to explain the concept that the atmosphere does not behave at random, but is a structured organized system, usually capable of self-regulation, and should be left alone except when it becomes temporarily unable to function normally, fall on deaf ears. Mr. Wells considers the normal weather of this planet dangerous.

He confirmed my contention that Ash was indeed using a water-grounded Reich cloudbuster, not a Trevor Constable-type Spider Unit, to try to weaken the cyclone that was nearing the Queensland coast. He claimed the attempt succeeded, and that the cyclone was weakened as a result. This illustrates that Mr. Wells does not know much about the Reich Cloudbuster. It also shows he did not read the weather reports.

A fully-developed cyclone is one of the strongest orgonotic systems on this planet. I strongly doubt even a sizable array of full-sized cloudbusters grounded into the Pacific Ocean could weaken one to any noticeable extent. In fact, the reverse is more likely.

 If the cloudbuster Ash was using was the one shown in the pictures and videos he has posted, it is located in his suburban backyard, not vehicle-mounted for quick and easy transport to the coast, and water grounding is provided by a garden hose running into a barrel that is overflowing.

With only that much grounding, the most likely effect would be that the far stronger system of the storm would draw energy through the cloudbuster tubes from the grounding water, not the other way around. I would expect the storm to actually increase in strength.

I myself saw something similar happen when I once pointed a small Medical DOR-buster, a miniature model of the cloudbuster, at small clouds and at jet aircraft contrails. The contrails broke up dramatically but the clouds, having a stronger orgone charge and more water content than the bucket my DOR-buster was grounded into, drew energy from the bucket, instead of the other way around, and the clouds increased in size.

 The direction of energy movement via a conduit such as a cloudbuster tube is not necessarily from sky to grounding water. It can go either way, depending on the relative charge of the grounding water and the point of aim. If the point in the sky that the cloudbuster is directed at is of greater strength than the body of water it is connected to, the orgonotic potential will draw energy through the pipes from the ground water to the cloud or storm center.

Which is in fact what actually did happen. The storm did pick up strength as it neared the coast. I noted this at the time and deduced that someone had attempted to weaken it by drawing directly from it, and that they had unintentionally strengthened it instead. The storm did, however, change course, and made landfall some distance north of where it had first been headed.

Shortly before the cyclone formed off the coast, Ash had been using a device that over-excites the atmosphere to induce an artificial contraction to cause artificial rain. A major flood had resulted. He had then resorted to a Reich cloudbuster in an attempt to stop the rain, and by drawing from too high an angle, made it worse. But rain by itself does not clear away all DOR when there is a very high build-up of DOR. It will help some, but some DOR will still remain.

The previous high concentration of DOR and the added excitation of the equipment Ash used that initiated the rain combined to add up to an unusually great excitation and irritation of the atmosphere over South Queensland. There were then two potential responses from the atmosphere. One would have been a return of the prolonged and serious drought of recent years. But apparently, the excitation was too strong for that. The other response, the one that actually took place, was the development of an extremely strong circulatory system in an attempt by the atmosphere to clean itself of DOR and restore a more normal condition devoid of irritation and over-excitation.

So the development of that ultra-strong cyclone off the coast was not just something that happened because of natural causes. It was a response of the atmosphere to the excessive excitation Ash had caused in his previous work, which had first caused the flood, then made it worsen. Ad if left alone, the cyclone would have headed directly toward the source of that excitation that had called it into being.

But Ash tried to weaken it by drawing from it with a cloudbuster in his backyard. This made it increase in strength, but diverted it toward the north, where it hit. Otherwise, it would have hit land where Ash was, since that was where the excitation it was trying to quench was located.

Reich and Bill Moise published several reports of cloudbusters being used against hurricanes on the East Coast of North America. It was possible, he said, to divert a hurricane from a predicted course. Several others, especially Dr. Richard Blasband, writing in the Journal of Orgonomy, have confirmed that since.

But Ash was unaware of anything that has been done in the field, and knew nothing of how a cloudbuster works or how the atmosphere works. To him, it was a magical device that somehow, by some unknown, magical means, makes the weather do what the operator wants it to do. He had no clue as to what the dynamics of the orgone energy underlying the effects of a cloudbuster might be. In fact, not being a scientist, and not having anything like any training or education in science, he did not even realize there had to be any such underlying dynamics. To him, as a layman with no idea of what science is or what it is that scientists do, it was all just magic.

Mr. Wells went into a lot of detail about how his own invention, the Wells-Newman device, affects the weather. None of what he said makes any sense in terms of orgone energy. Of course it would not. He obviously knows nothing about orgone energy, or he would not have made the elementary mistake of thinking it was possible to weaken a fully developed cyclone with a cloudbuster. So he has made some observations of an effect from his machines on weather, and concocted a theory to describe how he thinks it does whatever it is that it does.

His machines are powered by ordinary household electrical current. They have been seen to break up clouds, and are claimed, on less evidence, to block or break up storms. If this is true, it is easily understood on a basis of the orgone theory. All electrical devices create a mild oranur effect. Oranur can break up clouds and if strong enough, block a storm. If such an observation had been made by anyone familiar with the work of Reich, no new theory would have been thought necessary to understand what was happening.

It is only the social position of orgonomy, as an outsider view, unknown to the general public, that caused Mr. Wells to devise a new theory of his own to attempt to explain something he saw and could not understand.

Since his theory does not take orgone energy into account at all, but simply ignores all that is known in the field of orgonomy as if it had never existed and Reich had never made any discoveries, one is left with the choice of one of the two theories, his or the orgone theory. They cannot both be right. Mr. Wells suggests that the orgone theory is ``most likely flawed``.

But since all known observations of the atmosphere, including all observations made by Mr.Wells and his associates of the atmospheric responses to his machines, can be explained by the orgone theory, while the theory Mr. Wells presents to explain the alleged effects of his machine really does not explain anything, but simply replaces one unknown with another, I will stick to the orgone theory that has so far withstood the tests and trials of some 70-odd years of experiment.

Mr. Wells apparently fails to see the contradiction in his saying the orgone theory is flawed and his saying in the same letter that Ash weakened a cyclone with a cloudbuster. How does he think a cloudbuster could do anything at all if the orgone theory is flawed? Does his own theory account for how a cloudbuster could affect the atmosphere? If so, he has so far not made that part of his theory public.

If Mr. Wells accepts that the cloudbuster works, but does not accept the explanation for how it works, what other explanation does he propose? Or, is it all just magic?

Blog Archive