Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, March 18, 2011

How Much Evidence Do We Need?



"Sunday, February 20, 2011 12:01 PM
From: "Sylvain Pafumi" <sylvainpafumi@yahoo.com>
To: OrgonomicEcology@yahoogroups.co.uk
 
Joel,
 
We shouldn´t publicly accuse someone of being responsable for such damages as recently happened in Australia without being sure 100 per cent.
It's exactly as if, because I am interested in orgonomy, I would have been suspected by all my neighbors of causing the December 1999 storm which devastated France.
You do not have enough evidence to hold up in a court, so it is unfair to accuse someone in public." 
 
 
 Joel Carlinsky replies:
 
If it were a criminal case, with the possibility of a prison sentence, I would agree there should be an absolutely air-tight case. But this series of e-mails between so few people is not a criminal trial and there is no realistic possibility of any real punishment for someone we accuse of what in an ideal world, would be considered a very serious criminal offense.
 
The only power we have is the ability to "name and shame" and we also do not have the vast resources the state has to investigate suspects. If we had unlimited money to hire investigators we could tap phones, bug a suspect´s house, have some undercover investigator spend months, perhaps even years, getting to be his friend, send a girl to lure him into bragging about his power to control the weather to impress her, and force his e-mail service provider to give us copies of all his e-mails.
 
But we can´t do that. The only way we have to investigate a suspected case of cloudbuster involvement in a damaging storm is the way I have developed over the pàst 20 years in riding herd on James DeMeo. I look at the weather maps, and I look at what I know the suspect was doing, usually from his own publications, and I draw logical conclusions, based on what I know of how the atmosphere responds to cloudbusting, about what was most likely to have been done to cause what later happened.
 
That might not be enough to get a conviction in a court, and I am not sure I would want it to be. But in the world as it is, where no court would entertain a charge of causing damage by cloudbuster, and there is no budget for investigations, the only other choice would be to just drop the whole thing and leave whoever wants to do cloudbusting with no need for any accountability whatsoever.
 
That is not an option. Cloudbusting IS dangerous. And the massive and indiscriminate proliferation of cloudbusters must be addressed somehow. At this time, I am the only one trying to do ANYTHING about this environmental issue, and I have no other way to do it than what I have been doing.
 
So I will not just forget about it and let these people do whatever they wish to the atmosphere, secure in the knowledge that no court will hold them accountable. I will hold them accountable.
 
This is exactly the same thing the Sea Shepherds do about whalers., Whaling is illegal under international law, but there is no means provided to enforce that law, so the Sea Shepherds have declared themselves a private, unofficial law enforcement agency, enforcing international conservation laws on the high seas.
 
This is actually an activity that is envisioned and protected in an international treaty, the World Charter For Nature, a United Nations document that most nations have signed, but never live up to. It says " Individuals....to the best of their abilities, are responsible for enforcement of the provisions of this convention IN AREAS BEYOND THE JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS".
 
Since the atmosphere is "beyond the jurisdiction of any national government", I consider my anti-cloudbusting activism to fall under this provision of the World Charter For Nature.
 
And just as the Sea Shepherds use tactics that a government law enforcement agency would not use, so do I. I am not a police organization. I am a cyberjournalist, an investigative reporter, a whistle-blower, exposing activities that are destructive to the environment. And in that role, I do not have to stick to the procedures and standards that the police do.
 
The police are required to stick to those procedures to protect the innocent from being wrongfully conviced and punished. Since I have no power to actually punish anyone, I am within the proper limits of journalism to be satisfied with a lower standard of evidence than would be required to convict them in a criminal courtroom where they could be imprisoned for their crimes instead of just being embarassed for them.
 
 Please look up the website of the Sea Shepherds, www.seashepherd.org  and the public archive of the Yahoo Groups Earth First Alert list, and see how environmental groups conduct a champaign against companies like Monsanto, or against the Japanese whaling fleet.
 
They do not act gentle and polite about it. They do not hesitate to be offensive to the evil-doers who are trying to murder the earth. They do not expect to win over the evil-doers. They do not try to do that. What they try to do is get the people who are being hurt by the evil ones angry enough to stop them.
 
And using emotionally meaningful words like "evil-doers" is one of the tactics that has proven to be successful in many campaigns. When Captain Paul Watson says the Japanese whalers are members of the Yakuza, the Japanese Mafia, he does not show recordings of their phone calls or video tapes of their secret meetings to prove it to anyone. He just says it. Some people will believe it. Others will not. The ones who do believe him will be more inclined to help stop the whaling. The ones who do not, probably would not help much anyway.
 
What you are trying to do is talk me into going easier on the bastards who are trying to ruin the atmosphere. I will not do that. I will hit them as hard as I can. Every time. That is the only way to stop them. And I want to stop them. Not to be fair to them. Not to win them over and convince them to become nicer people. Not to win a debate with them. Not to look morally better than they are. To stop them. Nothing else. Just to stop them.
 
But it is also right to use every tool in the toolbox, so if you think a softer aproch would work, you try it. Then with both of us working on the case, with different tactics, there is that much better a chance of success. Every revolutionary movement needs both a radical violent underground and a legal, political, above ground faction that publicly denounces the underground for being too fanatical. That dual strategy has worked for the IRA and other groups, and it would be a good one for us to try too.
 
So you are hereby appointed my above-ground respectable faction. Feel free to tell people you agree with my goals but my methods are too uncompromising and fanatical. Then we shall see if your methods work better at getting them to give up attacking the earth with cloudbusters.
 
 If you have any better suggestion of how we can stop these people from cloudbusting, please tell me. But please do not tell me to wait until the official science community accepts the fact that cloudbusters work so the police will take over the job. That is never going to happen. So, in the absence of any governmental efforts to protect the earth from cloudbusting, how else would you suggest we go about it?
 
 
 

Blog Archive