Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.

**************************************************************************************************

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat.

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.


In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.



The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.



About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Total Pageviews

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Change In Jet Stream Affects Fish Populations

Sacramento River salmon take a dive - jet stream course change to blame?

This article is an excellent demonstration of how the interaction of natural systems are so complex and can affect something that would not be obvious at first glance. Since cloudbusting is known to be able to change the course of the jet stream, and people on the West Coast, such as the notorious group of bunglers who call themselves the "C.OR:E. Network, have ignorantly meddled in the fate of the rest of the world by doing so in the past, the shift in the jet stream may or may not have been due to someone on the West Coast using a cloudbuster without knowing enough about ecology to use it responsibly. If that is what has happened this time, that person almost certainly would never have thought of the possible impact on fish populations as a consequence of cloudbusting. As cloudbusting becomes an ever-more popular hobby, it is necessary to keep reminding anyone who might feel like taking it up, that there can be such unintended results.

Sacramento River salmon take a dive
Fishery management officials, surprised by the decline, expect Valley Chinook to rebound.
By Matt Weiser - Bee Staff Writer
March 3, 2007
Story appeared in METRO section, Page B3
http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/131920.html

Fall-run Chinook salmon that make a home in the Sacramento River and its tributaries fell last year to their lowest numbers since 1992, according to estimates by the Pacific Fishery Management Council.
This is a surprise to fisheries managers, because the population was expected to be strong after commercial fishing was drastically curtailed last year to protect Klamath River fish. The rebound for Klamath salmon is likely to mean better fortunes for Pacific coast commercial fishermen this year.
But now the troubled Sacramento River salmon are the center of attention.
That population includes American River fall-run Chinook, and only 8,728 salmon returned to the Nimbus Hatchery on the river last fall, according to the state Department of Fish and Game. That's the smallest number since 1997, well below the 2005 return of 22,349 fish.
The fishery council meets in Sacramento next week to draft plans for the commercial salmon season, which starts May 1.
"We're looking at it and wondering what's going on," said Allen Grover, a fisheries biologist at Fish and Game who monitors salmon. "I think it is a little bit worrisome."
Last year's commercial salmon season was cut by 90 percent along 700 miles of California and Oregon coastline to protect Klamath River Chinook, which had declined drastically the prior three years due to river management problems.
The shortened season was necessary because Klamath fish mingle in the ocean with more numerous Sacramento River salmon, and it is impossible for fishermen to target just one group.
The abbreviated season helped: About 30,400 natural spawners returned to the Klamath River last fall, well above the 21,000 predicted initially. This year, 65,300 spawners are predicted.
"We're looking at certainly a less restrictive season than last year," said Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations. "The one area of concern is what the hell is happening with Central Valley stocks."
While early projections for 2007 call for a population increase, the  big dip in last year's population caught researchers by surprise. The total population of Sacramento River fall-run Chinook was estimated at 435,000, about half its 2005 size. Of those, about 270,200 moved upriver to spawn, down from 394,000 in 2005.
A clue to the Sacramento River salmon decline emerged in a study published last week by the National Academy of Sciences. It documents a broad decline in Pacific Ocean food sources. Lead author John Barth, an oceanography professor at Oregon State University in Corvallis , said the cause was a southern shift in the jet stream in spring 2005.
That current of winds normally drives a deep upwelling in the ocean off Oregon and Washington that feeds the food chain. But the jet stream blew over California instead, disrupting ocean currents and causing a population decline among mussels and barnacles that feed on plankton.
"If you change the timing of this seasonal cycle, it doesn't provide the food for organisms that depend on plankton, and salmon are one of those species," said Barth. "If the food is not there when these organisms are naturally ready to make use of it, they're going to suffer."
Klamath River salmon may have been less affected by these changes because they don't range as far in the ocean as Central Valley fish.
Posted by at

Blog Archive