Search This Blog

Mission Statement

Cloudbuster Attacks On Planet Earth

Cloudbusting is a menace to the environment. Despite some claims to the contrary, cloudbusting is not a solution to environmental problems; it is a problem in itself, a destructive technology requiring a condemnatory response by the environmental movement.

Cloudbusting is not something new; it is already so comonplace as to be intolerable and an environmental movement to control this currently unregulated technology is needed to protect the public.

All over the world people are getting worried about what is happening to the climate. Each year, it seems, there are more and more extreme weather events of increasing severity and frequency. Records are being broken more often than ever before in recorded history. It is clear the climate of the entire world is becoming destabilized, less reliable, more random and chaotic, with droughts, floods, heat waves, and severe cold spells becoming the norm.

While there are several factors involved in this climatic breakdown, one seldom recognized major factor in this climate destabilization is the existence of a technological means to interfere with the natural movement of the atmosphere on a large scale. This device, called a cloudbuster, is simple and cheap enough to construct that in recent years hundreds of individuals all over the world, learning about it from instructions promiscuously posted on irresponsible websites, have taken it up as a backyard hobby.

Many of these individuals tend to be paranoid and delusional, and are using the cloudbuster as a sort of prop in a role-playing game, often imagining themselves to be fighting off hostile UFOs, resisting a secret government plot of some kind, or changing "bad" atmospheric energy into "good".

Many others claim they are "ending droughts", "making rain", or "doing research". They seem oblivious to the fact that the droughts they think they are ending resume as soon as they stop operating because the underlying cause of the drought has not been adressed. They fail to understand that the goal of proper cloudbusting is not to make rain, but to restore normal pulsation of the atmospheric energy so that, among other effects, rain will occur spontaneously as needed.

They ignore the rights of the people affected to be told what is being done to their environment and to have some say in the matter, and that subjecting people to a research program who have not given their informed consent is a human rights violation.

Some think they are "greening deserts", while in reality, they are subjecting the fragile dryland ecosystem to unusual stress from excessive rainfall in areas where all native life-forms are well-adapted to the prevailing conditions.

They usually have no idea of the scientific basis upon which the cloudbuster works, or fantasize, without evidence, that some wildly speculative theory of their own concoction is the better theory. Frequently they have little idea of what a cloudbuster is capable of, many of them, for example, thinking it only affects their local area.

As a result of these incompetent interventions in atmospheric dynamics, countless innocent victims have died and the environment has been seriously disturbed in numerous weather-related catastrophes.

Due to their paranoia they do not often communicate what they are doing to others working in the same field. Many of them, in fact, think they are the only ones doing anything with what they think is a somehow suppressed and secret invention. Many others are so arrogant they think nobody except themselves and their associates is able to conduct cloudbusting operations safely and properly, so they refuse to co-operate with those they deem "unqualified".

While there is certainly nothing secret or suppressed about the cloudbuster, it is regarded as crackpot by many of the scientific community, in large part because of the absurd fictions and folklore with which it has become surrounded. The fantastic legends of its' inventor, Wilhelm Reich, having been the victim of official persecution, or of some alleged conspiratorial plot, or having fought wars with beings from outer space, or having had meetings with Einstein, serve to distract attention from the serious issue of the menace of the cloudbuster he invented.

This large body of folklore functions to hide the reality of the cloudbuster as an effective, science-based tool and disguise it as a crackpot fantasy. It is perfectly right, in fact, the only rational response of anyone with even the slightest scientific education, to dismiss such a device as incapable of having any effect on the weather when it is presented wrapped in such packaging.

The failure to recognize the imput into the total atmospheric picture of this proliferation of crackpots playing around with cloudbusters means the scientists trying to understand the weather are misled into ignoring that a large portion of unusual weather events are being caused by this unsuspected form of technological intervention and instead think the climate changes now underway are being caused by some other factor, such as greenhouse effect from combustion products released into the atmosphere.

Any theory of what is happening with the weather and climate on this planet must take the social phenomena of a mass movement of cloudbuster hobbyists into account. And the environmental movement must mount an effective effort to counter this form of blatant interference with the atmosphere.

If and when cloudbusting is ever recognized by the scientific community as a science-based reality rather than a prop in a fantasy role-playing game, then it can be expected that official agencies will take over the job of protecting the public from improper use of the cloudbuster. But until then, it is up to concerned environmentalists to fill that role. Otherwise, until cloudbusting can be regulated, countless innocent victims will continue to die each year from cloudbuster-murder by crackpot Reichians.

And greenhouse gases from combustion will take the rap. The world is now facing serious economic problems at least partially caused by the mistaken belief that the atmospheric disorder caused by cloudbusting is due to a greenhouse effect instead, and numerous laws are in the process of being passed taxing or restricting fuel-burning activities in an effort to prevent weather disasters that are really being caused by cloudbusting and could only be prevented by restricting the use of cloudbusters.

Until effective regulation is in place, however, the few responsible people who are aware of the threat posed by cloudbusters must be ready and willing to take whatever action is needed to stop the use of cloudbusters in their home areas. Direct intervention by concerned citizens is often the only way to prevent serious harm to the earth and to the public, and this is one of those cases.


In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and
cloudbusting is now second only to nuclear power as the worst environmental

Cloudbuster proliferation has become a major environmental problem.

The cloudbuster is a very simple, easy to construct device that can be used to help restore a sick, damaged atmosphere to normal self-regulatory functioning.

This re-establishment of natural self-regulation to the atmosphere when it has become damaged and stagnated is the goal of any properly-done cloudbusting project.

Unfortunately, many people fail to grasp this point. Anyone who uses terms like "weather engineering", "etheric engineering", "weather control", "rainmaking", and the like, does not understand this important factor in cloudbusting.

It is an unfortunate side-effect of cloudbusting that it can be misused to cause rain and can have other direct effects on the weather.

In recent years many environmentalists have expressed concern that the details of how to construct a cloudbuster are too easily available on the internet. There is a growing Orgonomic Ecology Movement that is concerned about unwanted consequences of cloudbuster interference in the weather and seeks to prevent cloudbuster proliferation and combat those individuals guilty of hubris who wish to intervene in the weather by this means.

The Orgonomic Ecology group exists to explore ways and means to stop the proliferation of cloudbusters and expose to public outrage the power-drunkards and control-freaks who are attacking our atmosphere with cloudbusters, however they may rationalize their destructiveness.

We will pull no punches. We will name names and fight back against the propaganda of the atmosphere abusers and their enablers.

We regard Atmosphere Abuse as similar to other, more personal, forms of abuse, such as abuse of children or animals. The psychology of the abuser is the same, and we intend to expose that pathology.

We seek to build an anti-cloudbuster movement that can bring to a halt the rapidly growing hobby of manipulating the weather by control-freaks who are unable to leave the natural world alone.

Please spread the word around about this blog and urge your contacts to read it and to pass it on to their own contacts also.

About Me

I have been very involved in orgonomy since 1967 and have done cloudbusting, oranur work and laboratory experiments with orgone accumulators, medical DOR-busters, and pre-atomic chemistry. I was a student of Dr. Eva Reich, the daughter of Dr. Wilhelm Reich, who invented the cloudbuster, and have a letter from her saying I have learned what she has to teach and she considers me "very knowledgeable in this field".

Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

Friday, November 19, 2010

A Welcome Change Of Course

A new blog post on the Weather Rangers website by Alberto Feliciano, one of the leaders of the Weather Rangers, included this encouraging change of course:

Is it necessary to totally eliminate Hurricanes?

Probably not.
Many people have expressed concerns about what eliminating natural atmospheric phenomena might do to the planet's natural energies, and there might be something to that.
Maybe only those storms that threaten human lives should be altered a bit, not every single storm out there. Lets keep this in mind while we're working with the weather. There is still much, much to be learned about our Planet.
In the meantime let's also get ready for the People-killing storms. As you can see from the picture I posted today in our photos section, a picture from NOAA Hurricane Center, the season is now open: activity is picking up. August and September are traditionally the two busiest months of the year for Hurricane formation. Let's pray for guidance and do that which is best for all involved.
 I note that he does not say who these "many people" might be, but as far as I know, I am the only one to have expressed concern about the appropriateness of preventing hurricanes. And Mr. Feliciano has not replied to any of the numerous e-mails I have sent him on the subject.
On the contrary, he has instead posted a message approving of some personal defamation about me. That might possibly be the reason he is reluctant to identify the source who raised the issues upon which his change of thinking is based.
Possibly someone else has remonstrated with him about the potential risk to the biosphere of interfering with so important a natural phenomena, and possibly he has been convinced by to material I sent him that his former policy of trying to block all hurricane formation was of questionable wisdom. If someone else has managed to get through to him, I would like to know who it was.
But I remain unsatisfied by the depth of his conversion. This recent post, though welcome, still leaves many issues unresolved.
 He still has not mentioned the many ecological considerations I brought up which require no knowledge of orgone energy to understand, and he does not cite the specific orgone energy discovered by Wilhelm Reich, which underlies all weather phenomena and upon which the functioning of the cloudbuster is based, but refers in vague terms to unnamed "natural energies" (plural).
 He still has not mentioned, let alone subscribed to, the all-important concept of Atmospheric Self-Regulation, and he still has not grasped the distinction between a healthy atmosphere and a sick one. It is this concept of the way the atmosphere normally functions and the role of DOR in causing it to malfunction that presents a reliable guideline for when to intervene in a weather situation, not the anthropocentric criteria of if humans are likely to be killed or not.
He refers to "people-killing" storms and suggests that it might be all right to alter those, while leaving other, less dangerous storms alone. I would like to know how he plans to know in advance which storms will take lives and which will not.
I would also ask how is it possible to alter the course of a storm without taking responsibility for the new direction it is deflected into. If you save lives in a coastal zone by directing the storm out to sea, for example, and it then sinks several ships, drowning the people on board those ships, you are then responsible for killing those people, no matter how many lives you might have saved on shore.
The solution is not to distinguish between storms that kill some people and those that do not, since that would be hard to know in advance anyway, but to minimize the damage done by any storm by adopting sensible building codes, reasonable land-use policies and zoning laws that prevent large concentrations of people from congregating in areas that are known to be at periodic risk from storms.
 Such modest measures are less exotic and less gratifying to one who enjoys a sense of power than weather control, but are within the realm of possibility without the risk of wreaking incalcuable harm on the natural enivironment upon which, like it or not, human  life depends.
So I am glad to see Mr. Feliciano is open to changing his mind when he is informed about things he had not previously considered, and I look forward to his further enlightenment.
And, of course, I stand ready to provide him or any other members of the Weather Rangrs with any informatuion they may need to reach a responsible policy on how and when to intervene in the weather.
Joel Carlinsky

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Blog Archive