Hi, J-M,
Thanks for your input.
Jerry Decker is a big name in the alternative science movement and his website is the best source of information on that subculture. He is about the worlds ranking expert on other peoples inventions but has never had one of his own. He is mainly into free energy devices and is much more into those than cloudbusting. He seems to think cloudbusting and the orgone motor can exist in an information vacuum, and he is without any interest in what is behind them. He has no interest in "theory", only "working inventions".
He thinks the way to save the world is with more technology. He thinks the cloudbuster is a rainmaking machine that can give mankind the means to have whatever weather people want, whenever they want it. He is aware that some people would misuse it, and that is why he did not include exact details in his article. I have no problem with that. In fact, he really deserves gerat credit fir that restraint. But he does not know much about the biological sciences, and seems oblivious to the concept of atmospheric self-regulation or of ecology. There is no reason he could not have included information on what the plants and animals were doing before and after he operated, or the bioelectric potential changes in trees during his operations, except he does not know what to look for so he did not think of it.
He also thinks there can be several different methods of weather control, and all of them could work, even if they are based on contrary theories that mutually exclude each other. He does not make any distinction between cloudbusting and rainmaking by other means. He seems to think an infinite number of new forms of energy exist to be discovered and what Reich found was only one of them.
He is considered a leader in the free energy field despite never having invented a free energy device of his own, and so an article like this by him will result in many others doing such "experiments" to prove cloudbusting works. His witholding details won't stop them. He means well, but cannot understand that. And he will not listen to my advice. He thinks he is the only one to know anything.
Also, note his willingness to believe the people who tell him they have been controlling the weather all over the world for years without their having presented any evidence. He is always rightly very skeptical of any such fantastic claims in the free energy field. But in cloudbusting he thinks anything is possible because he does not know enough about how it works to know what is possible and what is not.
Jerry means well, but is from a physics and engineering background and simply cannot understand the concept of helping nature self-regulate instead of controling it. He does not know the underlying dynamics of DOR interfering with the normal flow and pulsation of the atmosphere and DOR removal as the goal of cloudbusting operations. He refuses to learn about things like that because he is only into "practical results", not "theory".
Unfortunately, he is not alone. There are a lot of others who learn of cloudbusting and think they should "do good" by destroying tornados, weakening hurricanes, making clear weather to give football fans a good day for a game, or some other anthropocentric disruption of whatever the atmosphere needs to be doing at the time.
Jerry also seems unable to grasp that my role is that of an environmental activist, not a "scientist" or an "inventor" and I am not interested in "advancing scientific knowledge". Apparently, "environmental activist" is something he has never heard of.
In this one case that he wrote about, Jerry seems not to have done any harm, but that is just good luck. He does not even know what changes in the atmosphere and biosphere to look for, and only happened by chance to aim correctly at the moderate DOR barrier and break it up. If it had been stronger or more solidly entrenched he would not have succeeeded. But the lasting results of his accidental DOR removal has convinced him this incorrect notion of setting up a long-term standing wave to get semi-permanent changes in weather is valid.
The group he says he is in contact with may be connected with a guy named Al Francouer, in British Columbia, who is a free energy enthusiast and has done cloudbusting, or what he calls cloudbusting, for many years. Or it could be a group called the Weather Rangers. Or there could be even more of these loose cannons around.
Joel
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.