The Danger Of Cloudbuster Proliferation

The Danger Of Cloudbuster Proliferation

In recent years, as the internet has made it possible for anyone with a
computer to spread the word about anything they please, irresponsible
instructions for building cloudbusters have mushroomed and I now would place
cloudbusting in second place only to nuclear power as the worst environmental
threat facing this planet.

At  least several hundred individuals have experimented with cloudbusters in
recent years, and almost none of them have understood enough to be able
to avoid causing problems. Some of those problems have included serious
ecological disasters and the loss of numerous lives.

There is an anti-nuclear movement trying to protect the earth from nuclear power
plants. As a supliment to that movement, we urgently need an anti-cloudbuster
movement to protect the earth and it's atmosphere from what my teacher, the late
Dr. Eva Reich, used to call "wildcat" cloudbuster operators.

  Anyone interested in helping to protect the earth against incompetent and
irresponsible misuse of the cloudbuster, please contact me at:
 joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com

Joel Carlinsky

International Law Affecting Cloudbusting: World Charter For Nature Article 16

International  Law  That  Applies  Cloudbusting

The World Charter for Nature is a United Nations Treaty that has been signed by almost every country in the world - except the United States. The following provision, would apply to any cloudbusting activities:

ARTICLE 16.

  (A) All planning shall include, among its essential elements, the formulation of strategies for the conservation of nature, the establishment of inventories of ecosystems and assessments of the effects on nature of proposed policies and activities.

  (B) All of these elements shall be disclosed to the public by appropriate means in time to permit effective consultation and participation.

Cloudbusting And The Environment

                                         Cloudbusting And The Environment
                                                     by Joel Carlinsky

Wilhelm Reich, in his book, "The Murder of Christ" spoke of the harm done to the cause of freedom by irresponsible "Freedom Peddlers" and warned about the possibility that his own work would be similarly usurped by "Orgonomy Peddlers" who would use it in harmful ways. As with so much Reich said, this warning has been ignored by many people favorably disposed toward Reich and his work, many of whom are supporting and encouraging individuals whose reckless and irresponsible misuse of Reich's invention of the cloudbuster and incompetent and misguided efforts to "prove Reich right" by using it to influence the weather are causing serious ecological damage.

The cloudbuster is an extremely simple device which is capable of having an effect on the weather over a very large area. If properly used, it can remove toxic, stale, stagnant orgone energy, known as DOR, from the atmosphere and restore normal conditions, ending droughts and enhancing biological processes throughout a vast region.

Improperly used, however, it can facilitate destructive intervention in weather conditions by people whose often good intentions are often matched by their profound ignorance of how an ecosystem functions.

Among the worst of these is a Dr. James DeMeo, of Ashland, Oregon, who has conducted numerous cloudbusting operations over many years and has caused the deaths of thousands of innocent people and done enormous damage to the environment.

  Dr. DeMeo and his associates are doing a great deal of harm to the environment and innocent members of the public by incompetent cloudbusting operations conducted without proper ecological knowledge or concern for the environment. Their bungled operations have frequently resulted in devastation to ecosystems and other damages, including the deaths of many innocent bystanders, due to storms, floods, and freezing weather.

In 1989, DeMeo, then living in the San Francisco Bay area, conducted a series of cloudbusting operations in the Arizona desert. As recounted in his article in the Journal of Orgonomy, he first visited Arizona in March, two months before the rainy season starts, and within 3 days had produced rain. He subsequently visited Arizona one weekend each month during the 5-month rainy season and brought rain each time for a seasonal total of 5 times the normal rainfall for the area in which he was working.

Now, in any area with a well-defined wet season and dry season, all native plant and animal species are adapted to the normal dry season and need it. Small burrowing mammals such as pocket mice, kangaroo rats, gophers, etc.give birth underground in the dry season; if it rains unexpectedly at the wrong time of year, the burrows flood and the infants drown.

Reptiles such as snakes, lizards, the desert tortoise, which is on the endangered species list, and the Gila Monster, found only in Arizona, lay their eggs in the dry season under a thin coat of sand, just enough to hide them but allow the sun to incubate them. If it rains out of season, the sand is washed away and they lose a clutch of eggs.

These small mammals and reptiles are the base of the food chain and if their population crashes so will that of the owls, coyotes, badgers, and other predators that depend on them.

Seeds dispersed in desert sand will germinate when they become moist. If there is out-of-season rain too long before the rainy season starts, they get a "false start" and then die before the real rainy season comes with sufficiently prolonged rains` to keep them growing until they produce a new generation of seeds.

The following year, DeMeo undertook a series of weekend expeditions to Arizona durring the usual rainy season. Since this series of operations was planned far in advance, when it would have been impossible to know what the weather at the time would be like, it was obviously not an attempt to break a drought or restore normal conditions. It was intended to be conducted regardless of what he actual weather at the time` of the planned operation might turn out to be.

The published report of that project shows a 500% increase in rainfall over the course of the wet season. Ask any farmer what 5 times normal rainfall would do to his crops! Unlike plants in non-desert areas, most desert plants lack the mechanism that limits uptake of excessive wather. Most desert plants absorb all the water they can get, and will swell up and burst when they get twice normal rainfall. This applies especially to the Sagaro Cactus, the State Flower of Arizona, which is on the Endangered Species List.

In "Contact With Space", Reich described exactly what he did in Arizona. He spent 5 months in the desert. He drove 100 miles every day just to familiarize himself with the landscape so he could note any changes in it. By contrast, James DeMeo lived in Northern California and commuted to the desert one weekend a month.

After 5 months of patient work, Reich succeeded in obtaining a lush growth of grass WITHOUT A DROP OF RAIN HAVING FALLEN ---- That's right! Reich, according to his own report, did not create rain in the desert and did not want to!

In fact, he explicitly says that rain would have made it impossible to obtain the increase in plant growth he did obtain, since it would have drowned the developing vegetation. Reich's goal, in which he was successful only after 5 months of patient daily labor, was not to make rain, but to revive the stagnant energy field of the desert to the point where it could regulate itself and produce rain at its own times, not according to some man-made schedule.

DeMeo misses this point entirely. He produces rain on an artificial schedule only to create impressive charts and graphs, ignoring the catastrophic effects of 5 times normal rainfall on all plant and animal species, and then, totally disregarding what Reich plainly said, claims to have "replicated" Reich's work in the desert. He repeatly refers to "Reich's rainmaking expedition" and to Reich "making rain in the desert" when in fact Reich specifically said he did not do so.

In subsequent years DeMeo undertook two trips to Namibia to break droughts there with a cloudbuster. He also trained local operators and left equipment with them so that Namibia now has a permanent drought- abatement program in place. Under normal conditions -- normal for the last 5-6000 years, that is -- Southern Africa has a regular cycle of 3 or 4 good years followed by a drought year.

In the dry years, the prevailing winds pick up millions of tons of dust and carry it out over the ocean. About half of it falls into the ocean where it provides silica, phosphates, and other essential nutrients to the phytoplankton which are the base of the marine ecosystem food chain. So in years when Southern Africa has droughts, life in the South Atlantic flourishes and in years Southern Africa has good rains, the South Atlantic marine life dies back.

The remainder of the dust is carried over to Brazil, where it is the sole source of trace elements not found in Brazilian soils which are essential nutrients for many tropical rainforest plant species. Like the sea-life, the Brazilian rainforest therefore flourishes in years when Namibia has a drought and declines in years when Namibia has plenty of rain. By establishing a permanent drought abatement facility in Namibia, DeMeo has contributed to irreparable harm to the global environment. (1)

In another case of ecological ignorance and irresponsibility, he reports in one of his publications that to make up a long-standing water deficit during a recent series of dry years in California, he extended the rainy season by a month one year and 6 weeks another year. I have spoken to a biologist at the Point Reyes Bird Observatory who tells me that in both years in question they lost a significant percentage of baby birds due to inclement weather during the normally dry nesting season. Baby birds get pneumonia in wet weather. Incidentally, some of the birds affected were on the Endangered Species List. (2)

In several consecutive years in which there was a drought in California, DeMeo and the group he belongs to, known as the C.OR.E. Network, conducted a long series of operations in an effort to end the drought pattern. While some rains did fall, the drought prsisted. It was obvious from reading his reports that the problem was the cloudbuster itself. As a safety measure, DeMeo and his associates use cloudbusters operated by remote control. This is to protect the operator from too much exposure to DOR in the immediate vicinity of the cloudbuster.

The remote control equipment uses 12-volt D.C. batteries to power electrical servo-motors to elevate and turn the cloudbuster pipes. Electricity has an excitng effect on orgone, and the 12-volt D.C. current was enough to cause an over-excitation of the field of the cloudbuster, which was then imparted to the orgone energy field of the atmosphere, causing an expansion that counteracted the contraction they were trying to cause to bring rain.

As a result of this attempt to end the drought, it was instead prolonged. The drought would have been over much sooner if there had been no cloudbusting attempted.

DeMeo has also done cloudbusting operations in the Middle East. I have seen documentation obtained from the National Climate Data Center, in Ashville, North Carolina,  showing numerous deaths of people in the region as a result of catastrophic weather during the periods in which he was operating there.

In addition to a cold snap that was the worst in recorded history and brought the first snow in 40 years to Israel, along with the deaths of 22 people in a snowslide in the mountains in Turkey, his own report contained documentation of people drowned in a flash-flood while camping in a normally dry riverbed, and several deaths in accidents caused by driving too fast under unfamiliar`conditions on rain-slicked roads. When questioned about this by some of his German collegues, DeMeo reportedly defensively replied that his operations in the Middle East had done so much good that a few` deaths were an acceptable price to pay. (3) (4)

Dr.DeMeo also conducted a 4-year project in Eritria to increase rainfall in that normally very dry country. The project was, according to his own report, a great success. However the effective range of the cloudbuster is very large, and the weather it creates does not stop at national borders. At the same time the rains were falling on Eritria, they also were falling on surrounding countries, and in neighboring Kenya there were disasterous floods, killing many people, followed by epidemics of water-bourne diseases like cholera and malaria caused by the increase in mosquitos which found favorable breeding conditions in the now water-logged landscape. About 20,000 people died of diseases in Northern Kenya as a result of the successfull cloudbusting operations in nearby Eritria.

DeMeo is the leader of a group called the C.O.R.E. (for Cosmic Orgone Engineering) network. Two other members of the group, Mr. John Schleining and Dr. Stephen Nagy, have on occasion taken it upon themselves to play Smokey the Bear and stop forest fires in Oregon. According to their own reports published in the Journal of Orgonomy, they have caused up to 2.5 inches of rain in a dry summer month which normally has about 0.25 inch. Ten times normal rainfall for that time of year! This is not drought relief; it is blatant disruption.The time to break a years- long drought is in the normal rainy season, not in what is normally the dry season.

Despite what Smokey told these people in grade school, natural wildfires have an important role in forest life-cycles and should not be prevented. They open up stands of trees so some can grow, recycle nutrients back into the soil, help some kinds of seeds germinate, and clear away underbrush that would otherwise accumulate enough in several years to cause an eventual really disastrous fire.By meddling in normal forest fire cycles, Schleining and Nagy are following an outmoded fire-suppression policy which the Forest Service now realizes was a mistake and has abandoned. (5)

According to the same report in the "Journal of Orgonomy", the cloudbuster was also used to prevent fire in another way besides increasing rainfall: it was used to decrease the number of lightning strikes in the area. Now, aside from its role in creating useful and necessary fires, lightning fixes atmospheric nitrogen into compounds plants can utilize. For plant species that lack a symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria on their roots, including many temperate-zone forest trees, lightning plays an essential role as a source of fertilizer, so this application of the cloudbuster, far from benefiting the environment, amounts to mere vandalism of Oregon's forests. (6)

 

Dr. DeMeo has also acted as an advisor for some groups in Europe who look to him for guidance and expertise in cloudbusting. One such group was responsible for a severe storm that killed about 200 people in Central Europe. (7) (8) (9)


**********************************************************************************************************

Documentation of Cloudbuster-related Damage By Dr. DeMeo and His Associates

  (1) My claim that atmospheric dust transport from Africa is essential to South Atlantic and South American ecosystems and that therefore cloudbuster interference with droughts in Africa is irresponsible and damaging is documented by the following:

The New York Times' International Edition on October 29, 1992 contains an article about how hot "October winds scoop up the thin topsoil off the African savanna, swirl it high into the skies, and thrust it west on a journey that can stretch thousands of miles." The article
by Marlise Simons goes on to explain how "the severe and lethal droughts of Africa are a boon for life in the Atlantic Ocean and for soil and vegetation in the Americas."

( Go to a public library and check out: Marlise Simons, "Winds Toss Africa's Soil,
Feeding Lands Far Away," New York Times, October 29, 1992.)

In addition to that New York Times account, There is also an article published in Tellus (1992, 44B, pp 133-149), a scientific journal, on "Saharan Dust in the Amazon Basin." The authors of the article, R. Swap, M. Garstang, and S. Greco of the University of Virginia Department of Environmental Sciences, are the same scientists who are featured in the New York Times account, and they make a compelling case that "Any strategy designed to preserve the Amazonian rain forest or any part thereof should equally concern itself with the inter-relationship between the rainforest, global climate, and the arid zones well removed from Amazonia."

(2) My source on bird mortality in wet nesting seasons is: Geoff Geupel, Pt. Reyes Bird Observatory, Bolinas, CA  (415) 868-1221 ext 30.

(3) The dates of operations in the Middle East by Dr. DeMeo are in his own report posted on his website. Compare those dates with the following for evidence that those operations killed a number of innocent people:

The January 4, 1992 issue of the "Weekly Climate Bulletin," a newsletter published by the Climate Analysis Center of the United States Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration  reports on a "New Year's Day storm [which] brought torrential rain and high wind to parts of the Middle East, forcing schools and businesses to close," flooding streets, blanketing Jerusalem with snow, "blacking-out" power for a fourth of the homes, creating "snow...for the first time in the mountains north of the Red Sea resort of Eilat," covering the mountains of northern Saudi Arabia with snow, downing
power lines and telephone lines in Lebanon, causing heavy avalanches in southeastern Turkey, and "killing 22 people."

The "Global Climate Highlights Feature" page states that "Abnormally cold air has
settled over large sections of northern Africa, the Middle East, south-central Asia, and the Far East during the last two weeks."

(4) On page 96 of the Pulse of the Planet, #4 issue, there is
a report by DeMeo entitled "OROP ISRAEL 1991-1992," in which [DeMeo] does mention flooding, homes destroyed, and people dying from traffic accidents on flooded roads as a result of the heavy rains occuring after DeMeo's November 1991 cloudbusting operations in the Middle East.
Quoting now from DeMeo's own report :

"Our research team had not anticipated the strength of the storms
which subsequently developed in the eastern Mediterranian.... When heavy
rains came, traffic often came to a standstill for hours.  Previously
bone-dry river beds and conduits filled quickly, and overflowed onto major
roads.... A few deaths also occured on the highways due to the fatal
combination of rain-slickstreets and highway speeding, or when people
attempted to drive their cars through rain-swollen streams.... Additional
difficulties also occured in a few areas when power lines were knocked down
by heavy winds or accumulated snow, leaving many persons without power,
sometimes for days."

Here, in his own words, DeMeo admits to having participated in a scientific
experiment which appears to have wreaked havoc on the public while
concurrently serving as the direct or indirect cause of several deaths

(5) My source for forest fire information is: Cascadia Fire Ecology Education Project, P. O. Box 3563, Eugene, OR 97403.  (503) 726-4738.

(6) An article published in "Science News," October 1995 documents an atmospheric chemist by the name of Pud Franzblau has discovered that lightning is a crucial ingredient
involved in the maintainence of life, because it "fixes," or breaks down, the nitrogen atoms
which exist in the air in a form unusable by plants, into a usable form. Up until Franzblau's fieldwork indicated that lightning is responsible for about 1 billion tons of nitrogen fixing (instead of only 10 million tons), researchers had thought that plants were the biggest nitrogen fixers on earth.

It should be apparent that messing around with the atmosphere with a cloud-buster without an inkling of its ramifications on the generation of lightning could have unforeseen, untoward consequences in the ecological system on nitrogen fixation, plant growth, and human existence.

 

(7)  "I stopped all the financing of cloudbusting as the president of the Wilhelm Reich Society because of the side effects in 1992  because I pointed out that nobody knew about the dangerous side effects of the operations ! As a result, James DeMeo became a furious enemy towards me."
        ------Heiko Lasek
              Berlin, Germany
            (Personal communication to the author.)


(8) Der Grund, warum für mich Cloudbusting lange Zeit kein Thema war, war eine Erfahrung, die ich in den 90er Jahren gemacht habe. Bei einer großangelegten Aktion, kam es zu einer internationalen Wetterkatastrophe, in deren Verlauf es etwa 200 Tote und Schäden im Bereich von 100 bis 200 Milliarden Dollar gab. Diese Aktion, an der eine Reihe von Leuten beteiligt waren, die sich heute in der orgonomischen Cloudbusting-Szene lautstark über die positiven Ergebnisse äußern, wurde daraufhin totgeschwiegen. Um keine rechtlichen Probleme zu schaffen, werde ich die genauen Umstände dieser Aktion auch nicht preisgeben. Obwohl diese Aktion (intern) als erfolgreich gewertet wurde, (weil eine monatelange DOR-Situation beendet werden konnte), werden das sowohl die Opfer und deren Angehörigen, wie auch die vielen Menschen, die ihre Existenz verloren haben, anders sehen. Außer den straf- und zivilrechtilichen Folgen, die das für alle Beteiligten haben könnte,
wurden auch internationale Abkommen verletzt.

Jurgen Fisher
Newsletter von www.orgon.de

 

(9)  On Thu, 3/12/09, Jürgen Fischer <orgon@......................> wrote:

From: Jürgen Fischer <orgon@................................>
Subject: Re : [OrgonomyMail-List] Tr : emotionnal plague
To: OrgonomyMail-List@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 8:19 PM

I did cloudbusting with DeMeo, Bernd Senf and others in the eighties and nineties. I did it in Arizona and in Germany. It always worked - even "better" than intended. The last operation (I was doing the videos) led to one of the biggest weather disasters in Europe with seven severe storms from Scotland to Greece that cost more than 200 human lives and many billions on money. Thousands lost their health and properties. Many forests were damaged for decades.

Well. No one of the nowadays "cloudbusting specialists" want to know about this event now - they simply don't mention any more - and they act on as if cloudbusting was a fine thing and could be done by some private persons. Actually it is very cheap and simple (about 2000,- $) to build a fully equiped cloudbuster and as myself anyone else who knows how to operate could built one and do it. And some really do.

Hurricanes and Ocean Plants

The Importance of Phytoplankton to the Earth's Oceans

Dec 23, 2008 Sharon Falsetto

The Effect Of Hurricanes On Ocean Plant Life - Chieh Cheng, istockphoto

Some ocean plants, such as phytoplankton, actually thrive from the effects of a hurricane; these tiny ocean plants are of great importance to the Earth's oceans.

Hurricanes are known for the great devastation left in their wake on land; however, as hurricanes race across the Earth's oceans, tiny ocean plants, called phytoplankton, thrive in the after effects. Phytoplankton are of great importance to both the survival of other fish and sea mammals and to the reduction of greenhouse gases.

What are Phytoplankton?

Phytoplankton are tiny, drifting plants which inhabit the Earth's oceans; they are usually too small to be seen by the naked human eye but can be seen as a green discoloration of the water when drifting in large numbers. This discoloration of the water is due to the chlorophyll present in the phytoplankton cells. Phytoplankton have many species and form the foundation of the marine food chain.

Phytoplankton need water, sunlight and nutrients to grow and need to be near the surface of the water to gain these elements; they obtain energy through the process of photosynthesis, the same process by which land plants do. Through the process of photosynthesis, phytoplankton are accountable for much of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere.

 

Phytoplankton need other nutrients, such as iron, in order to survive. Cold surface water allows the deeper depths of the ocean to swell up and bring these nutrients to the surface, but if the water is warm, essential nutrients are essentially blocked. Phytoplankton starve and die and, in turn, with the loss of the food chain, other fish and sea mammals die too.

The Effect of Hurricanes on Phytoplankton

Hurricanes stir up the oceans and consequently bring much needed nutrients to the water's surface, providing food for phytoplankton, and in turn, fish and mammals. A study carried out by the Applied Physics Laboratory at John Hopkins University in Laurel, Maryland between 1998 and 2001, used NASA satellite data to analyze the level of chlorophyll present in phytoplankton after a hurricane.

The study showed that the size, strength and speed of a hurricane impacted on the number of phytoplankton which benefited from the storm; for about two to three weeks after a hurricane, it appeared that phytoplankton grew in strength. Phytoplankton growth means the trapping of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere, through the energy conversion process of photosynthesis; carbon dioxide is carried to the ocean floor, in carbon form when the ocean plants die, a natural process of the Earth's carbon cycle.

Phytoplankton Influence on Global Change

Phytoplankton use carbon dioxide in the process of photosynthesis; more phytoplankton means more carbon dioxide used and taken from the Earth's atmosphere, lowering the amount of greenhouse gases. Phytoplankton are affected by the surrounding environment and therefore notify scientists to a change in environmental conditions in a particular area; phytoplankton population rises and falls in response to the availability of sunlight, water and nutrients.

Also on Suite101 

Climate Change, Carbon Dioxide and the Oceans

The general public is aware of climate change or global warming due to recent media coverage but few are aware that the oceans actually remove atmospheric CO2.

Satellite images provide scientists with a clear view of any change in color densities of a particular area of the oceans; a high population of phytoplankton will appear as certain colors on a satellite image, due to the process of photosynthesis (photosynthesis means that green light is reflected and red and blue light is absorbed). These tiny ocean plants are of extreme importance to the Earth's oceans, atmosphere and food chain.

References:

Earth Observatory

Phytoplankton

© 2008 Sharon Falsetto

Read more at Suite101: Hurricanes and Ocean Plants: The Importance of Phytoplankton to the Earth's Oceans http://plant- ecology.suite101 .com/article. cfm/hurricanes_ and_ocean_ plants#ixzz0szbL 4SJi

__._,_.___

"Improving" The Cloudbuster

The issue as I see it, is not if the cloudbuster can be improved or not, but if the operator can be improved. We do not need better equipment; what we need is more information on how the atmosphere functions and how to make better use of the equipment we have. A properly-trained surgeon, knowing the anatomy of the human body, can do surgery successfully with stone-age tools, but a person who does not know anatomy cannot do successful surgery with a modern, fully-equipped hospital operating room. Ideally, a full-scale training program for cloudbuster operators, comparable to medical school training required to practice medicine, would be a basic requirement to do cloudbusting. Many ideas have been proposed for "improvements" in the cloudbuster. Most of them seem to think that it could or should be made "more powerful". The idea that making the draw more "powerful" would be better is a fundamentally wrong one. The cloudbuster does not drag the air masses around by brute force. It draws only a very small portion of energy from a highly localized spot in the atmosphere, and the orgonomic potential is what does the rest. A stronger draw would not help anything. Anyone who claims to have a way to make the cloudbuster "more powerful" is simply displaying his authoritarianism. Such people should not do cloudbusting. The wish to "overpower" the atmosphere and FORCE it to do this or that is exactly the wrong way to go about cloudbusting. The response of the orgone atmosphere to cloudbusting is like an allergic reaction by the body. A very small grain of pollen can cause a very large man to convulse in a fit of sneezing. More pollen will not cause any more violent a sneeze. The reaction by the body is not in proportion to the stimulus. It is far greater than the mere amount of the stimulus would suggest. Cloudbusting can also be compared to sexual stroking and foreplay. Very gentle stroking at the right spot and at the right rate will accomplish the desired result far better than "powerful" rubbing will. In fact, the way a person behaves in bed with a lover is a prototype of the way that person will behave towards the atmosphere when doing cloudbusting. Someone who goes in for whips and chains in the bedroom will not be likely to show the proper respect and concern for the atmosphere when cloudbusting either. And the probable results will likewise be less than optimum. The usual "improvements" suggested for the cloudbuster generally fall into certain classes: the attachment of some electrical device to the cloudbuster, some form of geometrical shape, or some magnet, crystal, coil, or other attachment regarded as having some special properties. All of these suggestions show a lack of understanding of how a cloudbuster works. Any form of electrical stimulation of the field of the cloudbuster will cause a increase in the most popularized visual effect of a cloudbusting operation, the breaking up of clouds directly overhead. This impresses a lot of people who do not realize that breaking up clouds is not what a cloudbuster does. The name "cloudbuster" is highly misleading in this sense; it reflects the historical fact that that was the first effect noticed by Reich, but does not suggest to someone unfamiliar with that history the wide range of things a cloudbuster can do or how it does them. The expansion from over-excitation of the field of the cloudbuster is transferred to the atmosphere and causes an expansion of the atmosphere, breaking up clouds overhead. It also increases drought tendencies, and prevents the contraction phase of the pulsation of the atmosphere. If a drought tendency already exists, it will become worse and the continued operation of the cloudbuster will only prolong the drought.  This has happened several times when the remote-controlled cloudbusters used by Blasband, DeMeo, and Eden were used in areas on the West Coast, where a chronic drought tendency exists. Blasband invented the idea of using 12-volt D.C. servomotors to move the pipes around from a safe distance to avoid the DOR that is attracted to the cloudbuster in a drought atmosphere from affecting the operator. It worked fine on the East Coast, where the atmosphere is much more moist and mobile, but on the drier West Coast, it only resulted in increased drought tendency. Electrical current, as produced by batteries or generators, is what Reich called "secondary energy", and any application of any form of secondary energy to the primary energy, the orgone, will have the same effects. It makes no difference what "voltage", what "amperage", or what "frequencies" or any other minor variation on the basic theme there may be, it is secondary energy, and therefor it will trigger a mild oranur effect. This mild oranur effect will normally be much less than the intense oranur effect caused by radioactive materials, but it is of the same basic nature. Trevor Constable and some others have sought to "improve" the basic cloudbuster design by incorporating various new-age junk like coils, magnets, pyramids, etc. into the design. So far, none of these innovations has really done anything much except confuse people who do not realize what it is that a cloudbuster is supposed to do. Constable himself did not really believe most of what he claimed in his promotional articles. He deliberately lied about how he got his results because he was mainly interested in commercializing cloudbusting, not in advancing scientific knowledge, and had a commercial motive to keep information secret so his prospective customers could not just go out and do it themselves instead of hiring him. Most of the "new, improved" designs he published photos of over the years were nothing but decoys, stage props intended to distract attention from how he was really getting his results. He would put on a show for his prospective customers with these props, while at some distance away, out of sight, an accomplice would be doing the actual cloudbusting with the original Reich-style equipment, at his directions, passed on by phone. I know this because it was my own idea, which I used in Australia and told him about when I got back from my expedition to Queensland. Later, when he started showing off his "new, improved" models of cloudbusting equipment, I recognized my own scam when I saw it. I later was able to confirm that by talking to an old farmer in Bakersfield, California, who told me he had operated some equipment for Trevor when Trevor had phoned and told him when to operate it and what direction to point it. When I asked him what the equipment looked like, he answered, "It was just some lengths of irrigation pipe stuck in a barrel of water with a hose going into it and the water overflowing". The use of fast-moving orgone accumulators, of whatever shape, on cars or airplanes, does have an effect on the atmosphere, and such fast-moving orgone concentrations do not need to be grounded to have an effect, but the effect of any ungrounded accumulating device will be only partial. It will stir up and break up a DOR barrier, true enough, but it still does not get rid of DOR as well as drawing it into a large body of moving water will. There are some situations where it might be helpful to break up a DOR blockage that way, but in other situations, it might be better to use water-grounding. Constable does not even mention DOR at all in any of his books or numerous articles because he thinks thinking about it causes it! He once told me Blasband was "socking in" the whole East Coast with DOR by worrying about it all the time! So when it comes to DOR-removal and what to do about DOR, we cannot expect to learn much from Constable. He won't even think about it for fear of attracting it. Again, we do not need to learn any more about how to construct cloudbusters. The original device works perfectly well enough. What is needed, what the direction of research ought to be, is learning more about how the atmosphere normally functions, how it malfunctions and how it reacts to the stimulus from a cloudbuster, in the context of how the orgone atmosphere reacts to any type of stimulus, not just from cloudbusting. When we know enough about the atmosphere, then we will be able to do whatever we need to do with a cloudbuster, without needing any "new, improved" models of equipment being operated by the same old, ignorant operators.

Good Intentions

The evil that is in the world almost always comes of ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence if they lack understanding.
Albert Camus



Not all water shortages are due to DOR. We must always keep in mind that land-use policies are also a problem and there is little point in preserving the atmosphere if the land is to be devastated by ignorant uncaring humanity. In much of Africa, extensive over-grazing by cattle-raising tribes is the most important cause of expanding deserts. This group of well-meaning but ecologically uneducated meddlers is trying to help the cattle-raising savages to produce even more of their damned hoofed locusts to turn even more of Africa into a desert and drive away the remaining wildlife from even more of the few remaining water holes.

Below is a letter I wrote to one of these ignoramuses I had encountered:

Veterinaires Sans Frontieres A Menace to the Environment

Tuesday, June 1, 2010 11:49 AM

From:

joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com

To:...........................

Dear Ms......................,

After my conversation with you today, I read the Activity Report you gave me, and found it to be, as I had expected, totally anthropocentric in outlook. I am afraid it confirmed rather than alleviated my concerns about the short-sightedness and lack of ecological sophistication implied by a program that encourages cattle-raising in Africa. The practice of cattle-raising should be discouraged and phased out, not helped to continue to devastate Africa the way it has always done.

I found in your pamphlet no trace of concern for native species of animal life. No mention of any efforts being made to lessen the impact of cattle herds on wildlife population. No mention of any measures being undertaken to protect access to water sources for wildlife. No mention of restricting the numbers of cattle in an area to what the land can support. No mention of any concern that wild animals might be kept away from their only sources of water by herders who want to monopolize all available water for their cattle.

It seems not to have dawned upon the people in your organization that there is something much more important in Africa than humans and their cattle. There is a whole ecosystem there. An ecosystem that is the most diverse and biologically rich on earth. The same ecosystem, in fact, that created the human species among so many others. And unless the inherently highly destructive practice of raising cattle is reined in, it will not last another human generation. That would be a tragedy far greater than the mere economic displacement of a few cattle herders who would be far better served in any case by a program to re-train them for some other occupation that would be both better suited for their prosperity in the modern world and less destructive to the vital ecosystems of Africa.

You seemed in our short conversation to be unaware of the vast body of scientific and anthropological literature on the topic of biocentrism and the concept of Deep Ecology. That is not really surprising since most of the general public is unaware of those fields. But in the case of an activist who is working to promote programs you obviously believe and intend to be beneficial, it is dangerous in the extreme. I urge you to read up on the subject of Deep Ecology. You can find several books on it if you search the internet using search terms like "Deep Ecology", "biocentrism", and "restoration ecology".

I suggest reading Waste of the West, by Lynn Jacobs. It give a lot of scientific detail on the destructivness of cattle grazing to natural ecosystems.

If you really want to do something to help the humans of Africa, the most important thing you could do for them would be to promote birth control. Africa is drasticly over-populated and that is at the roots of all the other problems. Unless something is done to reduce the population, nothing else will help.

I urge you to re-think the long-term goals of your organization in light of the needs of all species, not just humans and their cattle. And please call this to the attention of your co-workers. If you have any further questions or comments, please let me know.

Sincerely,

Joel Carlinsky
 

Unwelcome Explanation

A reader wrote asking for precise directions on how to do cloudbusting. He was very exact in what he wanted to know. My answer must have been very frustrating for that type of person. Here is what I told him: "Most of the questions you are asking are dependent on subjective criteria and there is no precise answer of the sort you are asking for. The only really correct answer is to learn enough about orgone energy and how it looks, feels, and acts in a multitude of different situations to be able to recognize what you are seeing and know what to do. You keep asking for exact details that nobody can tell you because the situation is never static. The kind of details you keep asking for are the sort of mechanistic thinking that just does not work in dealing with orgone energy."

"Fun"

One lunatic wrote to another lunatic advising him to try cloudbusting "for fun". This sort of thing is alarming. "Fun" is not what people should be doing cloudbusting for. Anyone who wants to have fun by cloudbusting ought to take up practicing medicine for a hobby instead. It would do a lot less harm to the public.

The same ignoramus also advised "breaking rainfall records" to convince skeptics. Breaking records does not prove anything to skeptics. Records get broken all the time. Causing excessive rainfall is not in the best interests of the planet. It is simple vandalism by cloudbuster. The responsible use of the cloudbuster is to RESTORE NORMAL WEATHER CONDITIONS, not to break records.

Such irresponsible misuse of the cloudbuster is unfortunately possible, but it would be a lot better if such pathological people could be kept out of this field. Already, many innocent people have been killed by this sort of playing around with something that should be taken at least as seriously as doing major surgery.

Climate deterioration is caused by build-up of DOR. The proper way to do cloudbusting is to remove DOR and let the atmosphere return to normal behavior. The goal of any well-done cloudbuster operation is the re-establishment of atmospheric SELF-REGULATION which has been obstructed by DOR.

Any other use of cloudbusting is malpractice and only adds to the problem of the disruption of normal weather patterns.

I sent copies of this correspondence to members of my mailing list so the international Reichian community would be aware of  this potential danger to the stability of the atmosphere. But obviously, some more effective measures to combat such ignorant irresponsiblity are urgently needed.

Some Further Points

A few additional points I did not mention in my last letter.

 

Trevor Constable ended all public operations in America for exactly the reason that I was talking about, the risks of being held liable for storm damages. DeMeo has so far not been worried about this risk because he thinks no official body will accept that cloudbusting works, so he is in no danger of being sued.

 

 He is arrogant enough to think that if cloudbusting ever did become accepted, he would be put in charge of the government weather control program. This shows how little he knows of how the political system works. If cloudbusting became accepted, the first Director of Weather Control Services would be some senior scientist with the right political connections, not an outspoken politically incorrect radical like DeMeo.

 

Then there would be Congressional hearings on what weather to have, and the big business interests with the most money for lobbyists and campaign contributions would end up getting the weather they want for their own business interests and the rest of the public would just have to put up with whatever weather those businesses wanted.

 

And DeMeo would end up like all the anti-war scientists who worked on the first atomic bomb, picketing the White House, protesting what the government was doing with what he had taught them.

Legal Entaglements

Many people have been killed by side-effects of cloudbusting. That is not always due to carelessness or incompetence of the operator either. It is simply impossible to limit the extent of a cloudbusting operation to a small target area and impossible to know in advance what might happen to people over the large area affected in case of a storm.

 

The only reason nobody has ever been charged with manslaughter so far is that the establishment does not believe cloudbusting can actually affect weather. If they ever do become convinced of it, cloudbusting will be outlawed and anyone doing it will be charged with murder or at least manslaughter the first time some innocent person dies from a weather-related cause.

 

The same goes for the civil suits for damages that will be filed against any known cloudbuster operator as soon as the courts are convinced cloudbusting might be responsible for someone suffering financial harm. No government can grant anyone permission to damage property or kill people and promise them they will not be sued or criminally prosecuted. Individuals could still file suit and prosecutors have full discretion in deciding who to bring criminal charges against.

 

Cloudbusting is also a human rights violation under international law because it is classed as an experimental procedure. To experiment on anyone without his consent is a human rights violation. That was firmly established by the Neuremburg Trials in Germany after WWll. To secure informed consent from every person in the area covered by a cloudbusting operation would be impossible, but if even one person refused to consent, it would be illegal to proceed because you would be subjecting him to a scientific experiment without his permission.

 

American cloudseeding companies carry expensive insurance policies, but that works only because cloudseeding is only marginally effective, if that, and the area that can be affected, even if all the claims made for it are true, is so small compared to the area affected by a cloudbuster. It would be impossible to buy insurance for a storm the size of New South Wales, for example.

 

That is one reason I would not want publicity. And I should think that if you have a farm that someone could get a lien on if they filed a suit against you, you would not want it either. This is exactly the sort of legal entanglements the system always uses to tie up people like Reich, or any unorthodox medical pioneer. Why provide them with the legal excuse they need to get you involved in fighting them in court?

Victoria, Australia Legislation On Rainmaking

Version No. 014

Rain-making Control Act 1967

No. 7637 of 1967

Version incorporating amendments as at 8 February 2008

TABLE OF PROVISIONS

Section Page

1 Short title and commencement 1

2 Definitions 1

3 Authority to carry out rain-making operations 2

4 Authority to make arrangements 2

5 Form and content of authority 2

6 Consultation of Ministers 3

7 Duration of authority 3

8 Cloud-seeding in Victoria to induce rainfall in another State 3

9 Offence to carry out unauthorised rain-making operations 4

10 Certificate to be evidence 4

11 Minister may order discontinuance of unauthorised operations 4

12 No liability in respect of authorized operations 5

13 Reports on rain-making operations 5

14 Construction of references to rain etc. 6

15 Regulations 6

═══════════════

ENDNOTES 8

1. General Information 8

2. Table of Amendments 9

3. Explanatory Details 10

i

Version No. 014

Rain-making Control Act 1967

No. 7637 of 1967

Version incorporating amendments as at 8 February 2008

An Act to regulate certain Rain-making and other Cloud-modification Processes, to make Provision with respect to Claims for Damages against Persons lawfully engaged therein and for other purposes.

BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of Victoria in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same as follows (that is to say):

1 Short title and commencement

(1) This Act may be cited as the

(2) This Act shall come into operation on a day to be fixed by proclamation of the Governor in Council published in the Government Gazette.

Rain-making Control Act 1967.

2 Definitions

In this Act unless inconsistent with the context or subject-matter—

prescribed

means prescribed by regulations made under this Act;

rain-making operation

means the seeding or nucleating of clouds by artificial means from a manned aircraft. 1 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

3 Authority to carry out rain-making operations

s. 3

(a) for improving primary production either generally or locally and whether with respect to one or more than one primary product;

(b) for improving water storages either generally or locally;

(c) for reducing fire-danger in a forest area; or

(d) for any other sufficient purpose—

the Minister may authorise the carrying out of rain-making operations in respect of the area or areas concerned.

Whenever it appears to the Minister to be desirable in the public interest to promote rainfall or otherwise modify natural cloud processes in any part of Victoria—

S. 4 amended by No. 46/1998 s. 7(Sch. 1).

(a) shall be in writing signed by the Minister and addressed to the authorised officer or body;

(b) shall be subject to such conditions limitations and restrictions as are prescribed or the Minister thinks fit to impose with respect to carrying out the rain-making operations; and

4 Authority to make arrangements

Where the Minister authorises rain-making operations under the foregoing provisions of this Act he shall issue his authority to some person or body under his control to make arrangements for carrying out those operations.

5 Form and content of authority

(1) Every authority under this Act to carry out rain-making operations—

2 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

(c) may at any time by the Minister be revoked or varied by notice in writing to the authorised officer or body.

(2) An authority given by the Minister under this Act may authorize rain-making operations to be carried out on any specified day or days or may authorise a programme of rain-making operations to be carried out whenever atmospheric conditions are favourable during any period and in any area specified in the authority.

S. 5(3) amended by Nos 41/1987 s. 103(Sch. 4 item 55.1), 46/1998 s. 7(Sch. 1).

(3) The Minister shall cause a copy of every authority issued under this Act to be forwarded to Minister administering the

Water Act 1989, the Minister administering the Conservation, Forests and Lands Act 1987 and the Minister administering Part 9 of the Local Government Act 1989.

6 Consult

ation of Ministers

s. 6

The Minister shall not revoke or vary any authority issued at the request of any other Minister without first consulting with the other Minister upon the matter.

7 Duration of authority

Unless sooner revoked an authority under this section shall remain in force until the rain-making operations authorised by the authority have been carried out or, if any time is specified in the authority for completing the rain-making operations, until the expiration of that time.

8 Cloud-seeding in Victoria to induce rainfall in another State

At the request of the Minister of an adjoining State administering any Act corresponding with this Act the Minister may authorise rain-making operations to be carried out in Victoria to promote rainfall in the adjoining State.

3 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

9 Offence to carry out unauthorised rain-making operations

s. 9

Any person who carries out any rain-making operations in Victoria which are not authorized under this Act shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty: $1000 or imprisonment for twelve months.

10 Certificate to be evidence

A certificate in writing purporting to be signed by the Minister that any specified rain-making operations were or were not authorized under this Act to be carried out shall be conclusive evidence that the operations were or were not so authorized.

11 Minister may order discontinuance of unauthorised operations

(1) Where it appears to the Minister that any person or body is carrying out or is about to carry out rain-making operations not authorized under this Act the Minister may by order require the person or body to discontinue or refrain from commencing the rain-making operations.

(2) An order made under subsection (1) shall be in writing signed by the Minister and may be served personally or by post.

(3) Any person or body to whom an order under this section is addressed who fails to comply with the terms of the order shall in addition to any penalty to which he is liable under section 9 be liable to a penalty of not more than $1000 for every day upon which he continues to carry out rain-making operations in contravention of the order.

4 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

12 No liability in respect of authorized operations

s. 12

(1) Neither the Minister, any person or body authorized by the Minister to make arrangements for carrying out a rain-making operation, nor any person carrying out rain-making operations authorized by the Minister under this Act shall in any way be liable in respect of any loss or damage caused by or arising out of the precipitation of rain hail sleet snow ice fog or mist in consequence of the rain-making operations so carried out.

(2) A person carrying out rain-making operations outside Victoria under and in accordance with the law (if any) corresponding with this Act and in force in the State or Territory where the operations are carried out shall not in any way be liable for any loss or damage caused by or arising out of the precipitation in Victoria of rain hail sleet snow ice fog or mist in consequence of the rain-making operations so carried out.

13 Reports on rain-making operations

S. 13(1) amended by Nos 46/1998 s. 7(Sch. 1) (as amended by No. 12/1999 s. 3(Sch. 1 item 24)), 12/1999 s. 4(Sch. 2 item 10.1).

(1) The person or body authorised to make arrangements for carrying out rain-making operations under this Act shall furnish a report in writing concerning those operations to the Minister in accordance with the provisions of subsection (2) or upon request in writing made by the Minister.

S. 13(2) amended by No. 46/1998 s. 7(Sch. 1) (as amended by No. 12/1999 s. 3(Sch. 1 item 24)), 12/1999 s. 4(Sch. 2 item 10.1).

(2) Every report in writing made for the purposes of this section shall be in the prescribed form signed by or on behalf of the person or body concerned and shall be lodged with the Minister—

(a) where the operations will be completed within fourteen days from the commencement thereof—within forty-eight hours after the completion of operations;

5 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

(b) where the operations extend more than fourteen days from the commencement thereof—not later than Wednesday in each week with respect to operations conducted during the week ending at midnight on the previous Saturday; and

(c) where the report is requested by the Minister—within the time stipulated by the Minister in the request.

s. 14

(1) In any Act other than this Act and in any other law contract agreement or instrument (whether passed made or entered into before or after the commencement of this Act), but subject to any express provision to the contrary in any Act, a reference to rain hail sleet snow ice fog or mist includes a reference to rain hail sleet snow ice fog or mist (as the case requires) which resulted or may have resulted from a rain-making operation and every such Act law contract agreement or instrument shall be read and construed and have effect accordingly.

(2) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as depriving a person of any right of action that he might have apart from this Act in respect of or arising out of a rain-making operation that is not authorised under this Act.

15 Regulations

The Governor in Council may make regulations for regulating and controlling rain-making operations and activities and in particular, without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, for or with respect to—

(a) prescribing forms for the purposes of this Act;

6 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

(b) prescribing conditions limitations or restrictions to which authorities given under this Act are to be subject and prescribing penalties of not more than $100 for contravention of or failure to comply with any condition limitation or restriction to which an authority is subject;

(c) prescribing the information to be furnished by persons or bodies carrying out or assisting in rain-making operations under this Act;

(d) regulating the letting of contracts for carrying out rain-making operations;

s. 15

(e) prescribing the equipment to be used in carrying out rain-making operations and the mode of carrying out such operations;

(f) prescribing the qualifications of persons employed in carrying out rain-making operations and prohibiting the employment of unqualified persons;

(g) prescribing penalties not exceeding $100 for breach of regulations made under this section; and

(h) generally any matter or thing required or authorised to be prescribed for carrying this Act into effect.

═══════════════

7 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

ENDNOTES

1. General Information

The

Rain-making Control Act 1967 was assented to on 19 December 1967 and came into operation 1 May 1968: Government Gazette 1 May 1968 page 1708. 8 Rain-making Control Act 1967 No. 7637 of 1967

2. Table of Amendments

This Version incorporates amendments made to the

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Rain-making Control Act 1967 by Acts and subordinate instruments.

Conservation, Forests and Lands Act 1987, No. 41/1987 Assent Date:	19.5.87
Commencement Date:	S.103(Sch. 4 item 55.1) on 1.7.87: Government Gazette 24.6.87 p.1694.
Current State:	This information relates only to the provision/s amending the Rain-making Control Act 1967

Endnotes

Endnotes

14 Construction of references to rain etc.

From A Letter I Wrote To A Correspondent...........

 If he thinks he can break the huge cultural and psychological barriers to acceptance of orgonomy by "proving" something to government officials with a video, he is living in a fantasy world. There are a number of such videos already and so far they have never converted any skeptics.

Such people show up from time to time and spend a lot of resources trying to be missionaries for orgonomy and save souls for Reich. They cause trouble for the serious workers in orgonomy, but none has yet managed to convince the world of cloudbusting being real. And that is all for the best.

Thank you for your concern. Please feel free to ask me any questions you may have about orgonomy.

I will send you some information to back up my point that cloudbusting should be done only very rarely, with full regard for the ecological situation.

Response From India

Dear Mr. Carlinsky,

I share the exact same views that you do about cloudbusting. I had specifically mentioned to .............. not to release any pdf's for the public on a cloudbusting unit as I feel it would do more damage than good to the weather. Though I had the documents on how to make a cloudbuster for almost seven years now I didn't try to build one as I wanted to make this only when I completely understood how it can be used safely without harming anyone or the environment. I had received a mail from ............. yesterday, who basically wanted try to make a unit similar to Wilhelm Reich's to do something about the drought in Australia.

Ravi Raju

For The Record................

Dear Sir,

I was sent your e-mail address by someone who had had some correspondence with you about cloudbusting. My name has apparently been mentioned and my position may have been misrepresented.

 I am NOT interested in contributing to any misguided efforts to convince the public, governments, or scientists of the effectiveness of the cloudbuster. It is too dangerous to be widely publicized. Such publicity would only lead inevitably to proliferation of cloudbusters as a backyard hobby for people who cannot be expected to know how to use it properly.

I have been involved in orgonomy since 1967, had tutoring in orgone biophysics from Dr. Eva Reich, daughter of Wilhelm Reich, and have done cloudbusting in North America and Australia. The more than 2,000 posts on the subject which I sent to the orgonescience list, which I formerly moderated, are currently being edited into a book which will be the first book to present to the general public the full theory of orgone biophysics as first developed by Reich, along with my own extensions of orgonomic insights into an orgonomic concept of evolution, ecology, and biodiversity.

I have written extensively about the environmental damage being done by ignorant people getting excited about cloudbusting and rushing in to try to make rain without first spending the years of study needed to learn how the normal atmosphere functions.

I strongly disaprove of anyone doing cloudbusting without a solid grounding in orgone biophysics as well as ecology. Irresponsible enthusiasts thinking they are doing a good deed have done incredible damage to the earth, including killing many innocent bystanders.

 Both Trevor Constable and James DeMeo, both of whom have a lot of fans and followers who regard them highly, have been guilty of flagrant violations of basic principals of responsible cloudbusting.

If you or anyone you know of are sincerely interested in cloudbusting, please contact me and let me know what you are doing or plan to do.I may be able to give some advice that could prevent some of the damage that could otherwise result, including harm to the health of the operators.

 And if you hear of anyone working with a cloudbuster, please let me know also.

Thank you.

Joel Carlinsky

A Warning From India

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:14 PM, RAVI RAJU <raviraju1@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi ................,

You need to be very careful with this stuff as the effects of this can be felt for hundreds of miles. This was proven by Wilhelm Reich and his associates when they could create storms in other states and continents... but they used massive tube structures to do this... so just in case it falls into the wrong hands they could screw around big time as this could affect huge areas... what I mean is that they could declare a weather war and you just wouldnt know why or how its happening. So, be very very careful about what you want to say in public about this.

But please, please stay away from the cloud buster.. you don't want them going! Unless its a place where it rains for half the year or more.

Recomendation From Jamie Ogg

In some recent e-mails, Jamie Ogg has said some things that reflect unfavorably on my knowledge of cloudbusting and my history of tutoring from Dr. Eva Reich. I have no idea what motivated him to change his mind and why he has become hostile to me, but in the past he has spoken favorably about my competence, as this exerpt from one of his e-mails shows.


On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, allmyforce <allmyforce@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Joel should be one of your  sources of info on CB work.

  He did plenty of it, learned from Eva Reich, and yes, he is knowledgeable."

Letter To Heiko Lassek In Berlin

From: joel carlinsky <joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com>
Subject: On orgonomy in Germany, 1990 to now...........
To: .Heiko Lassek......................................
Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 2:49 AM

Hi, Heiko,   In regard to your letter, (reproduced below), I can only remind you that in the early 90s I sent you a lot of documentation on how much harm DeMeo was doing by his incompetence at cloudbusting. You never told me if you used any of it or not in reaching your conclusion to stop helping him. Other members of the WRI told me they had not known of all the material I sent to you, so I assumed you had not shared it with the group.   I heard there was an orop in Europe that killed a lot of people, and that was the reason you decided to stop doing cloudbusting. I also heard there was an angry confrontation with DeMeo about some of the deaths he had caused, and he dismissed the complaint on the grounds the small number of deaths was justified because of all the good his work had done.   I heard there was a split in the WRI because of the experiments of Bernard Harrer, who came to the conclusion that all Reichs' findings could be explained in terms of orthodox science and there was no need to postulate an ether. I was told the WRI decided to issue a formal statement that orgone was not a physical reality, but only a philosophical construct. I was told this was the reason Eva quit her association with the WRI and so did several other people.   None of this was ever made public in any way that would alow someone not an insider to know who was saying what. I only found out about all this in-fighting years later from personal conversations with people who were involved. But I could see in his advertisements that DeMeo was still getting help from Bernd Senf, Manfred Fukert, Stephan Muschnich, and others who were part of your group the last time I had heard anything about them. So it was reasonable for me to think you were still helping him despite what he had done.   I still have no idea what realy happened at that time, or what, if any, part the information I sent you might have had in it. Would you mind teling me the whole story, please?   Blasband is also still getting help from your associates in organizing his lectures in Germany. I sent you plenty of documentation to show he had some very bad affiliations. He was a member of the Knights of Malta, a neo-Nazi organization whose leader was Charles Pitchel, who was once the personal representative in America of Adolph Hitler. Blasband was considering going into a commercial cloudbusting business with him. I sent you some documents to prove this.   Blasband also was responsible for the ACO accepting and funding Trevor Constable to do work in California that kiled a lot of people there. Constable had been a campaign worker for George Walace in the 1968 presidential campaign. Walace ran on a racial segregationist platform, so what does that tell you about who Blasband ( a psychiatrist )  considers emotionaly healthy enough to be trusted with cloudbusting? He is either a fascist or incompetent, take your choice.   Blasband has now effectively quit orgonomy and taken up religion. In his last article in the Journal of Orgonomy, he says that the "intent" of the operator can affect the results of cloudbusting independently of the actual physical movements of the pipes.    I have seen the direction of cloud movement shift in accordance with changes in the point of aim of the pipes when they had been moved by cows bumping against them. What was the intent of the cows? Were they trying to bring changes in the weather?   Or do you, a mental health professional,  consider mystical thinking a valid way to understand the universe? And a sound basis for responsible work with a cloudbuster?   My campaign against these people is not just a personal feud as you seem to think it is; it is a form of social activism, exactly the same as that of people who campaign against nuclear reactors or deforestation or the extermination of endangered species.  It is every bit as important as any scientific research in a laboratory could be. It is directed at protecting the earth from the harm caused by irresponsible or incompetent bunglers with cloudbusters.   To dismiss my realistic concerns over faulty cloudbusting as just a matter of some personal grudge against some specific person is to trivialize all environmental activism, as the right-wing anti-environmental propagandists do when they say environmentalists are motivated by this or that psychological factor and ignore that there are real environmental problems that really do require a solution.   If cloudbusting is going to be used by people with nationalistic or other political agendas, and by muddle-headed mystics, it will be nothing but another form of pollution. Remember: Alfred Nobel invented dynamite as a way to end wars by making them too destructive. He only ended up making war more destructive than it was before. And the cloudbuster might end up being the worst thing that could happen to the environment, instead of being a way to help.   I wrote over 2,000 posts to the orgonescience list in the two years it existed. The list archive is now being edited into a book to be posted on a website. It contains a lot of new material never published anywhere before. Some of that material is from my own observations, and some is based on things Eva told me that she had not made public in her lectures. That material includes many things she learned from Reich that are not in his published writings, and as we now know, his unpublished notes will never be made available by the Trust. So my effort to pass on what she passed on to me is the only chance anyone will ever have to learn it.   A lot of it has to do with how to detect if someone is cloudbusting and where they are operating from. That information might be needed someday to help protect the world against people with cloudbusters, so I want to pass it on to prospective environmental activists.   But none of this has anything to do with the Reichian - or pseudoReichian- cult that is so fixated on the public image of Reich and his personal life story. I do not care if the skeptical world ever recognizes Reich or goes right on thinking he was a fool. I am not a missionary for orgonomy. I am not trying to save souls for Reich.   The Wilhelm Reich Estate is nothing but an obstruction standing in the way of people who want to make practical use of the knowledge in the Reich Archives. That you think them worth collaborating with shows you have not thought through exactly what you want to do and why you want to do it.   I am still available for a seminar on orgone biophysics in Berlin or anywhere else if anyone wants to organize it for me.    But I am interested ONLY in orgone biophysics, not therapy, childraising, social or political theories, conspiracy-theories, or UFO stories. And I will pull no punches; people interested in therapy or "philosophical constructs" will not like what I have to say.   And certainly not biographical trivia about Wilhelm Reich.

False Claim Exposed!

From Joel Carlinsky - Fw: Trevor Constable

Friday, February 27, 2009 2:20 PM

From:

"Dr. Peter Lindemann" <drL@free-energy.ws>

View contact details

To:

joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com

Mr. Carlinsky,

With regard to your email inquiry, this is what I know.

At this point, Trevor is rather advanced in years.  I believe his ability to become involved in any commercial weather modification operations is over. 

 

Trevor does know Ken Swartz, but to the best of my knowledge, Ken has only "interviewed" Trevor for the purposes of writing some articles on his website.  I do not believe that Ken could be considered "trained" in the art, by any stretch of the imagination. 

 

 It is also my understanding that weather modification operations are banned by Federal Law in Australia. 

Beyond this, you are welcome to believe whoever you want, and do whatever you want, as you always have.

This is all I know about the situation.

Sincerely,

Peter Lindemann, DSc


http://us.mc1117.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=support@free-energy.ws wrote:

 

----- Original Message -----

From: joel carlinsky

To: http://us.mc1117.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=support@free-energy.ws

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:43 PM

Subject: Trevor Constable

Hi, Peter, I have had some correspondence recently with some guy in Australia who is anxious to promote cloudbusting there. He refered me to a contact of his in America, a Ken Swartz, who claims to be Constables' "main student". I thought that was your role, but that was a long time ago and you might have moved on. Or he might be exagerating his connection to Constable. Are you still working with Constable? Do you know who this Ken Swartz is? I would like to know a bit more. What can you tell me about him? Thank you. Joel Carlinsky