Grounds For Suspicion

My conclusion that incompetent cloudbusting was responsible for the floods in Queensland was based on more than just that one inadvertant admission by Jamie Ogg that he had known Ash was trying to stop the rains just before the rain increased.

I had also seen pictures of a cloudbuster Ash had on his website, and he had sent pictures of a Trevor Constable-type "Spider Unit" he had built to several lists and said he was testing it to see what changes it caused that would change the readings on an orgone field meter. This was just before the rain started.

The sequence of events then looked like this. First, Ash does tests of the Constable device, not understanding what it really does to the atmosphere or how it does it because what Constable says it does is something different, disguised to prevent anyone who sees it from understanding it enought to be able to get desired results with it. Then, after the device triggers excessive rainfall, Ash asks friends in America for help in stopping the rain, still not knowing it was his own earlier work that had started it.

Then, acting on advice from Jamie or someone else, probably Karl Schwartz, a fraud who falsely claims to have been a student of Constable, Ash tries to stop the rain with a standard-model Reich cloudbuster, and not knowing that a draw from vertical will cause a prolonged, heavy rain, as Reich said and I have seen for myself, draws from too high an angle, close enough to vertical to cause the already contracting atmosphere to contract still more, increasing and prolonging the rain.

This sequence of events can be clearly seen on the weather pictures from space. And there is no way an already contracting atmosphere, with the rain already having gotten started, would suddenly contract still more all by itself. If it is already in the contraction phase of the expansion-contraction cycle, it will not contract additionally unless an additional contracting stimulus is applied.

 Somebody must have been cloudbusting at the time right AFTER the rain had started, and Ash was the most logical suspect since he was in Queensland, was known to have a cloudbuster, and had been operating just before that when the rains started, as shown by his posts to the orgone lists about his tests with the field meter.

This suspicion was then confirmed by Jamie, who I already knew Ash was in the habit of asking for advice on things orgonomic. The highly defensive reaction of both Ash and Jamie when I made public this suspicion is additional evidence that they both are at least at some level, aware that that is what happened, but are in denial.

Additionally, I had sent an e-mail to Hugh Lovel, an American now living in Queensland, who is into biodynamic farming and has many contacts in that field in Australia. If someone in Queensland was doing cloudbusting, Hugh is likely to know of it, but he answered that nobody he knew of was trying anything with a cloudbuster. That does not totally rule out the possibility that someone other than Ash was cloudbusting, but it does greatly reduce the likelihood.

So I would consider the odds that Ash caused both the start of the rain and the intensification of it afterwards as good enough, if not for a conviction, at least for an arrest warrant and indictment.

"Controlling" The Weather

Weather control is like armoring. It is the usual way of the armored person, a person who defends himself strongly against a preceived dangerous world,  to think the problem is caused by things being "out of control" and that controling them would make the problems go away. Actually, the exact reverse is true.

 

The armored person who controls his breathing, for example, is having physical and emotional problems because of that control and if he could STOP controlling it, the problems would be over. The controlling of the breath is the reason there are problems.

 

The normal atmosphere, functioning without human intervention, is the one we grew up in, the environment we developed in for millions of years, and are best adapted to live in. It is therefore the condition in which we are safest.

 

The most important atmospheric danger at the present time is that the atmosphere no longer is being left alone to do what it does without human input. It is being affected by modern nuclear and electromagnetic technologies. It is being damaged, disrupted, and destroyed by these modern technologies. And adding yet another layer of even MORE modern technology to the already sick and dying atmosphere will not help anything. It will just speed up the process of killing what is left of the atmospheric BIOLOGICAL energy.

 

Like the patient whose problems are caused by too much control, the atmosphere needs to be released from the burden of human intervention so it can recover and function normally again at it´s own pace, not at a pace determined by humans and what they are doing to it.

 

The authoritarian personality cannot see any good in anything functioning as it wishes to without being controlled by someone. They feel threatened by the freedom of children, animals, and societies. They feel that anything not under control is a danger. And in this case, the atmosphere is the intended victim of their control-freak mentality. These people want to control the weather because it frightens them to not have power over everything around them, both natural and human.

 

It is no accident that the same people who get interested in controlling the weather are the ones who are on the far right of the political spectrum in other fields as well. For example, they are very likely to be free-energy advocates, thinking that finding some new power source, such a motor that runs on the ether, will solve all environmental problems.

 

This bit of idiocy is standard in the alternative science movement, which is a right-wing movement that ignores all the other types of environmental problems, especially the really BIG one of over-population, and tries to claim all environmental issues can be solved by discovering a new power source without the cultural pain of changing social customs and life-styles.

 

The job of the environmental movement is to stand in the way of this so-called "progress" and stop this destructive intervention before the atmosphere is totally killed by these control-freaks and their shinny new toys.

 

The Stevens device does not look like it is anything like the Wells-Newman device, and it probably is not.

 

But nearly ANY electromagnetic device can have harmful effects on the weather. And given that the control-freaks do not see that these effects ARE harmful, they will celebrate them as a wonderful scientific breakthrough in "weather control" instead of seeing that what they have found is really another way of HARMING the weather.

 

So it may indeed have an effect on local weather conditions, though almost certainly, not a good one.

 

And, yes, you are right. We may have to get used to "democracy" in the field of "weather control"-a democracy in which everyone who wants to control the weather can do so for a few dollars from their backyard.

 

In which case, the only thing we can hope for is that civilization collapses and most of these backyard weather-control hobbyists get killed off in the fighting over what is left in the supermarkets before it is too late for the atmospheric life energy to recover from the damage they will do to it.

 

An Overview Of The Cloudbusting Situation

Dear Dr. ................,

 

You ask a lot of good questions, but unfortunately there are no good answers. I will try to summarize the background to the situation.

 

1. I have been involved in orgonomy for over 40 years, have done most of the basic experiments first done by Reich, and some orginal ones, and was a student in the only seminar Eva Reich ever taught on orgone biophysics. My experience includes the first cloudbusting expedition in Australia, in 1971.

 

2. As the internet has made spreading information around so much easier that it was before, more and more people have found out how to construct a cloudbuster. Hardly any of them have a clue to how to use it properly. The result has been a lot of eratic weather, and numerous deaths have been among the results. I have documented many of these cases on my blog, www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com

 

3. My role has morphed into that of a crusading cyber-journalist, blowing the whistle on incompetent irresponsible misuse of the cloudbuster. In this capacity of environmental activist against Cloudbuster Malpractice I have made many enemies among the Atmosphere Abusers. Not surprisingly, some of them have attempted to retaliate by posting defamatory articles about me on various internet venues. This is the normal spate of personal attacks any environmental activist regularly undergoes from those he criticises. The more effective the criticism, the more vehement the attacks.

 

 In most cases, it is harmless enough, since the people I am trying to reach are not likely to fall for such obvious slander of an environmentalist, and the people who are likely to believe the lies told about me are not likely to become active against cloudbusting anyway.

 

In particular, conspiracy-theorists and free-energy advocates are seldom environmentalists and could not be expected to become active in a campaign to obstruct use of what they think of as a new technology. The free-energy believers are almost always in favor of any new technologies and expect new technologies to save the world from environmental problems, while the conspiracy-believers think the corruption of few bad eggs in positions of power is the real problem and expect to solve it by political means. Neither is a potential activist against a mass movement of well-meaning but incompetent middle-class backyard hobbyists irresponsibly playing with a new technology.

 

4. I am not against all cloudbusting. On the contrary, I consider properly-done cloudbusting to be a much-needed adjunct to the environmental movement, with the potential to at least partially off-set the harm being done to climate stability by nuclear technology.

 

The wide-spread use of radioactivity is the most serious problem facing this planet, and the cloudbuster, while certainly not a panacea, could do a lot to help keep the earth habitable until the Atomic Age is over and the atmosphere can start to recover from the damage that the use of nuclear power has inflicted upon it.

 

The issue is not cloudbusting, per se, but improper cloudbusting by persons who do not understand the principles involved, the most important of which is atmospheric self-regulation, a concept that authoritarian personalities seem unable to grasp.

 

5. Cloudbusting can be taught, but it is more like a neuro-muscular skill, like swimming or riding a bicycle, than an intellectual subject of study, so it cannot be taught or learned via the printed word, over the internet. The ability to recognize proprioceptive sensations is much more important than any book-learning in subjects like meteorology or atmospheric physics. In fact, formal training in such subjects is not only irrelevant, but a positive drawback.

 

Another major drawback is mystical thinking. Many people who are attracted to cloudbusting suffer from habitual mystical distortions of their thinking processes, which can become dangerous if they are allowed to manipulate the weather.

 

6. The people who do the best work in cloudbusting come from a background of kindergarden teaching, animal training, gardening, and artistic pursuits. The ones with the worst record come from a background in physics, engineering, especially electrical engineering, and meteorology.

 

There is even some doubt if cloudbusting can be properly learned by adults, and it is likely that only young trainees, under the age of 17 or so, should be accepted for training. A proper training program for adolescents would take about two or three months of full-time personal instruction, and would not include meteorology, which is largely irrelevant.

 

7. The cloudbuster is based on a fundamental breakthrough, and is not just an extension of current scientific knowledge, and the most important lesson to be learned from it is that it renders the prior scientific model of the atmosphere obsolete and all previous concepts of atmospheric functioning must be abandoned. This strikes some persons with formal scientific training as heresy and they strongly resist it. But no progress will be made until the current model of the atmosphere is dropped from consideration.

 

The orgonomic model of the atmosphere certainly does not exclude the well-attested role of naturally-occuring cycles based on astronomical factors, but superimposes upon those natural cycles two additional factors of human origin. One is a global, ongoing, generalized deterioration of atmospheric stability, a breakdown of the coupling between the atmosphere and the underlying orgone field that is the ultimate Prime Mover of the material componants of the atmosphere. This gobal oranurization is behind most of the long-term changes in climate that are being conventionally --and wrongly-- ascribed to greenhouse gases.

 

The other factor taken into consideration by the orgonomic model of atmospheric functionig, but ingnored by the conventional model, is the genesis of specific weather events in cloudbusting operations. Many severe storms, floods, etc., are known to have been caused by poorly-done cloudbusting operations. The recent disasterous floods in Queensland, Australia, which were caused by a series of bungled operations by a Mr. Ash Palise, of the Brisbane area, are only one example of this added factor that must be taken into account to form a complete picture of what is happening in the atmosphere.

 

 

8. A basic miscalculation by many people who do not understand the concept of cloudbusting it that there is some way to improve the cloudbuster. There is not. No improvement on the original design is possible. There are many claims of better forms of equipment than the original cloudbuster, as designed by Reich, but on close examination they all turn out to be either outright lies for commercial purposes or self-deception by individuals who do not understand the way a cloudbuster works.

 

There is certainly much room for research, and much research should be done, but inventing new forms of equipment is not the direction research should go. What is needed is more information on how the atmosphere functions, and how the operator functions while interacting with the cloudbuster. We need better operators, not better equipment.

 

Another miscalculation is the blind faith in elecromagnetism that misleads some people into thinking some elecrical form of weather manipulation is possible. Since electromagnetism is a secondary form of energy, and such secondary energies interact with the primary energy of the atmosphere, irritating it into a toxic and more randomized state of activity, all any electromagnetic device can do is add to the disruption of an already damaged atmospheric energy substratum. There is no way any electromagnetic device could ever do any good in terms of helping to restore a damaged atmospheric energy system to normal functioning, which is the point of a properly-conceived cloudbusting operation.

 

9. There is no law specifically against cloudbusting yet, but there are numerous laws that could be used to put a stop to free-lance cloudbusting by individuals. Activists should have no trouble convincing the authorities to take action against independent cloudbuster operators under already existing laws that were intended for other purposes.

 

 In case where the authorities prove unconcerned, there might be other ways to trigger some action. An insurance company, for example, might be persuaded to use their considerable influence to instigate legal action against persistant cloudbuster operators to protect their profitability. Or a civil suit for storm damages could be filed, which even if not ultimately successful in a trial, would drive up the cost of cloudbusting beyond what most people interested in it could afford.

 

10. The most urgent need right now is for a Code Of Ethics for cloudbuster practicioners, and a set of standards that can be agreed upon for what goals to attempt. Since at this moment, such considerations seen hopelessly Utopian, my role of investigative journalist, cyber-activist, Nemisis, and Jiminy Cricket to the growing cloudbuster movement, seems assured.

 

Sincerely,

Joel Carlinsky

( Former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )

 

 Permission to post herreby granted. Please forward this message to any person or group you think might be interested.

 

Please contact joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com  with any questions or comments.

 

For more information, check out www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com

 

or join the Yahoo Groups mailing list at

OrgonomicEcology-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk

 

 

The Legal Position Of Cloudbusting

This was sent to another list to counter some DELIBERATE misinformation being spread around on the internet by malicious individuals who are trying to irresponsibly encourage cloudbuster proliferation. These individuals want as many irresponsible incompetent people as possible to take up cloudbusting as a hobby or sport, an activity which could cause severe environmental destruction.   For details of some extreme storms and other ecological damage caused by such individuals, see my blog, www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com                                          The Legal Position Of Cloudbusting   It is often overlooked that cloudbusting is illegal in almost every developed country. Laws that are intended to regulate cloudseeding would be applied automatically to any new method of weather-modification that came to the attention of the appropriate reguatory body.   In the United States, the law requires 10 days advance notice to NOAA for any weather-modification work. There is no mention in the law about any particular method, so it would apply to any means of weatrher modification.   The National Environmental Policy Act requires public notice and oportunity for the public to comment before any project that would affect the environment can be started.    The Wilderness Act makes it illegal to do anything to alter the pristine character of a Designated Wilderness Area, a designation that includes parcels of land scattered throughout the Western states so thickly that it would be almost impossible to avoid affecting at least one with any cloudbusting operation.   The Endangered Species Act makes it illegal to do anything to affect the habitat of a listed species, of which there are so many, that again, it would be almost impossible to avoid such an area with a typical-sized cloudbuster operation.   Several states have laws requiring weather modifiers to carry insurance coverage to guarantee compensation to property-owners who might be harmed by the altered weather.   Numerous court rulings in civil cases have held that cloudseeders are liable for damages if they cause rain that does any damage to anyone. The courts place a lot of stock in prededent, so they almost certtainly would rule the same way in a similiar case involving some other form of modifying weather if such a case ever came before the courts. The legal issue would be the damage done, not the method used. And civil cases, unlike criminal cases, can be brought by anyone, so there would be no need to convince a public prosecutor to file charges.   A treaty signed by the US in 1978 makes military use of weather modification or any research on it for military purposes, illegal. Since 60% of all US research is funded by the Pentagon, scientists wanting research grants could not obtain funding as easily as for other projects because only private-sector funding would be available.    In Australia, all weather modification needs a specific act passed by the legislature, and is not allowed without such an act. In the European Union, international human rights agreements forbid doing any scientific experiments on people without their consent, so to do a weather-control experiment it would be necessary to get the consent of every person in the area to be affected, or it would be a violation of the rights of anyone who did not give consent to be experimented upon.   When Trevor Constable wrote an article about his using an aircraft for airbourne cloudbusting operations in Hawaii, I contacted the Federal Aviation Administration and told them about it. I sent them a picture of the airplane that Constable had published in his article about it, showing the equipment attached to the outside of the small airplane. They investigated, and the pilot had his license suspended for a time. It is illegal to attach anything to the outside of an aircraft that might alter the flight characteristics of the aircraft. This is an excellent example of how activists can use existing laws to obstruct atmosphere abuse without having to convince anybody about the effectiveness of cloudbusting. So cloudbusting is already illegal almost everywhere. Anyone doing cloudbusting is in violation of several laws that already exist. What we need to do is be creative in thinking up ways to get those laws enforced without having to convince the scientific community or the government that cloudbusters work.      PLEASE FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO ANY INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS THAT MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN CLOUDBUSTING OR PROTECTING THE EARTH FROM  TECHNOLOGICAL INTERFERENCE WITH NATURAL WEATHER CONDITIONS.   Anyone with any comments or questions may contact me at joelcarlinsky@yahoo.com   My blog, www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com contains numerous articles on the subject of cloudbusting and the environmental damage done by incompetent and irresponsible misuse of cloudbusters.   And anyone concrned about this menace to environmental stbility is invited to join my Yahoo Groups mailing list, OrgonomicEcology-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk     Joel Carlinsky ( former orgone biophysics student of Dr. Eva Reich )

Tactics Against Cloudbusting

I do not think orgonomy will ever be accepted by the scientific mainstream. It is too far out of step for that to ever happen. Not only paid scientists, but any educated layman who has a good understanding of modern science, knows better that to agree with anything so "obviously wrong".

 

I think some people's desire for research funding to become available has made them too optimistic about the prospects for acceptance of the orgone theory. It will not happen in our lifetime.It would be better for them to search for private sources of research funding instead of waiting for governments to fund orgone research.

 

But if it ever did happen that the scientific world got converted, it would be a total disaster. Then millions of idiots would take up cloudbusting as a sport. The result would be atmospheric chaos and more destruction than this world could ever hope to survive. And you can forget about government reulation. It is physically impossible to stop any great number of cloudbuster-freaks from building and using secret cloudbusters. They are too easy to make and the materials are too easy to get.

Cloudbusting is already illegal. There are laws almost everywhere that could be used to ban cloudbusting if the prosecutors wanted to enforce them. In America, the Wilderness Act makes it illegal to "alter the pristine character of a designated Wilderness Area. That would include altering the weather of such an area, and since there are many such designated areas, and the typical cloudbuster operation covers so much ground, it is impossible to use one in the western states without violating that law.

The Endangered Species Act makes it illegal to do anything that affects the habitat of an endangered species, and there are so many of them that any orop would violate that law also.

The National Environmental Policy Act makes it a requirement to hold public hearings to allow the public to commnent before doing anything that would affect the environment.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has a requirement that any weather-modification project must notify them at least ten days in advance of the start of operations. There is a $10,000 fine for failure to notify them.

In Australia, all weather modification needs a specific act passed by the legislature, and is not allowed without such an act. In the European Union, international human rights agreements forbid doing any scientific experiments on people without their consent, so to do a weather-control experiment it would be necessary to get the consent of every person in the area to be affected, or it would be a violation of the rights of anyone who did not give consent to be experimented upon.

There are also financial liability issues involved. In several American states, cloudseeders are required to have insurance coverage to guarentee they can compensate anyone whose property is damaged by their operations. Those laws would also apply to cloudbusting.

When Trevor Constable wrote an article about his using an aircraft for airbourne cloudbusting operations in Hawaii, I contacted the Federal Aviation Administration and told them about it. I sent them a picture of the airplane that Constable had published in his article about it, showing the equipment attached to the outside of the small airplane. They investigated, and the pilot had his license suspended for a time. It is illegal to attach anything to the outside of an aircraft that might alter the flight characteristics of the aircraft. This is an excellent example of how activists can use existing laws to obstruct atmosphere abuse without having to convince anybody about the effectiveness of cloudbusting.

So cloudbusting is already illegal almost everywhere. Anyone doing cloudbusting is in violation of several laws that already exist. What we need to do is be creative in thinking up ways to get those laws enforced without having to convince the scientific community or the government that cloudbusters work.

 

Anyway, what makes anyone think the government could be trusted to use it any more responsibly than anyone else? They would do as many wrong things with it as most people.

 

The Orgonomic Ecology  blog, www.orgonomicecology.blogspot.com , is not aimed at winning converts to orgonomy. It is aimed at people who already know at least something about cloudbusting and are not scientists and are willing to at least consider that it might work. If 01% of my readers end up joining me in a campaign to stop cloudbuster malpractice, that would be a good result.

 

There are other things that can be done to put pressure on individuals and companies  besides passing laws, and it would only take a small number of people to do some of them, so I do not need to win over the whole public. Boycotts, public exposure and shaming, and sabotage of equipment used in their activities, driving up their expenses, are all tactics that have been used successfully by various movements.

 The Animal Rights movement is one good example of a group that uses tactics that can be used by a small minority to put pressure on evildoers despite lack of majority suport.

 By exposing the ecological problems caused by his cloudbusting, I have been able to persuade several people to stop donating to DeMeo's research fund. This reduces his ability to go on cloudbusting expeditions.

 

I do not need a majority. I need a few good determined activists who are not afraid to be out of step with the mainstream of their culture. And the blog is intended to help me find them. If I can get a few people who are willing to work hard on the issue of atmosphere abuse by cloudbuster malpractice, that will be enough. I do not need the scientists or government. Especially since that is impossible anyway.

 

So my trying to educate those few who might be interested in helping with a campaign is not inconsistant with my saying it would be better to discredit orgonomy to the public to help keep down the numbers of cloudbuster freaks who would take it up as a sport if they found out about it.

Hurricane Near Australia

This storm ( link to news story below ) looks like it is being augmented by a foolish attempt to weaken it by someone in South Queensland pointing a cloudbuster at it. While it is often possible to divert a storm with a properly/designed cloudbuster operation, there is no case on record of anyone ever succeeding in weakening a full-blown hurricane by drawing from it.

 Such a draw would be more likely to increase the strength of the storm since by the orgonomic potential, a very strong storm system would draw energy the other way, from the water the cloudbuster was grounded into, into the storm,via the cloudbuster.

I have seen this happen on a small scale. Once, when I was using a small DORbuster ( a miniature of the cloudbuster ) grounded into a bucket of water inside a small accumulator to experiment on breaking up jet aircraft contrails, I pointed it at a small, but apparently strongly/charged cloud. Instead of the cloud breaking up, it grew! There was more water in the cloud than in my bucket, so the draw went the other way, and the DORbuster acted as a conduit for the cloud to draw energy out of the bucket.

But some people do not know that. And if someone draws from a strong storm system, the likely result would be to greatly strengthen the storm, which is what seems to have happened in this case. 

A Mr. Ash Palise, who happens to live in Queensland, has been engaged in cloudbusting operations lately and judging from the incredible level of stupidity involved, this looks like his work. Investigations to confirm this suspicion continue. Mr. Palise can be contacted at <ashtweth@gmail.com> if you want to send him an e/mail and express your opinion of his experiments in weather control.

Please forward this message to everyone on your list. The people of Australia need to be warned about this incompetent individual monkeying with their weather..

Hurricane Diversion

Reich and Bill Moise published several reports in the 50s in Reich's journal,C.OR.E., on their having successfully diverted hurricanes out to sea that had been predicted to hit the East Coast. Blasband published reports in the Journal of Orgonomy of his having done likewise in the late 60s and early 70s. So there is little room for doubt that a cloudbuster can divert a hurricane if the operation is begun early enough.

The method is to draw from the direction of the land, weakening the orgone potential inland, so the potential out to sea becomes relatively stronger. This attracts the storm out to sea, away from the weaker potential inland.

Since a cloudbuster works by altering the orgonomic potential in one part of the sky to make that in some other part of the sky relatively stronger, the same result would reasonably be expected from any other method of building up a relatively strong potential in one location compared to another location.

So if someone on shore had a device operating that excited the local orgone field into a higher state of activity, the storm would be attracted towards that device. Then, if some other factor also was at work, such as the normal vector of these types of storm, which is what you suggested, the ultimate vector of the storm would be about what the pictures from space are showing now, a compromise vector that, together with the normal path of such storms, indicates an unusual build-up of charge in South Queensland, where Ash, who has a device that can excite the local orgone field, happens to live.