Cloudbusting, Farming, And Population

Many of the people who decide to try cloudbusting are farmers or if not farmers themselves, they cite "helping farmers" and "producing more food" as one of their main reasons for cloudbusting. But so far, to the best of my information, not one of them has ever been active in any effort to reduce demand for food by reducing the population, something that could reduce the need they think exists for interfering with the functioning of the atmosphere to grow more food.

Several vegans have suggested there would be less land needed to grow grain if people gave up eating meat. The reasoning seems to be that since cattle are fed grain, and eat more than humans would, the grain saved by not feeding them could be eaten by humans.

That thinking overlooks the fact that it is only in the United States, with 5% of the world population, and a few other first-world countries, mainly in Northern Europe, all with small populations, that cattle are fed on grain. In most of the world, cattle are raised only on grass, and the land used to graze them is marginal land not good for growing crops, which is why it is used for grazing.

So if that land was no longer used for grazing, other land, now in a more or less natural state, not in use, would have to be cleared to grow the extra crops that would be needed to feed the people that portion of their diet that now comes from grass via cattle. This is shown in Brazil, where a lot of rain forest has been cleared to grow soybeans to export to Europe and America to be eaten by people who have been convinced to take up a vegan diet.

It can also be seen in Southeast Asia, where large tracts of rain forest have been cleared to grow palms to provide vegetable oil for export to Europe and North America for vegetatrians and vegans to use in cooking. So, instead of killing cows, these well-meaning but uninformed people are indirectly killing elephants and orangutans by depriving them of their habitat.

One recent correspondent sent me an article that claims the earth could grow enough food for twice the current population on the same amount of land by improved farming methods.

I replied:

"An interesting article. But it has a number of flaws. It does not even touch on the immense damage done to the natural plant life by modern methods of farming, such as genetic modification of plants used for crops. Animal life also is harmed by modern farming methods like that, as in the case of bees needed to pollenate plants being killed by GM plants they feed from, and lab rats being rendered sterile by eating GM foods.

Growing more crops is not the answer. It is only the answer Monsanto and other  purveyors of agricultural chemicals and GM seeds want to sell as the answer.

 If only safe and ecologically sound farming methods were used, only a small fraction of what is grown today could be grown. It is true that modern cattle raising is a very harmfull practice, but if the best replacement for it is to grow more crops with modern agricultural methods, that could be even worse.

To really do any good, it is not enough to replace one evil with another, and posibly worse one. We need to solve the root problem, too many people on this planet, not just switch them from one form of destruction to another by changing their diets. The problem is not what these people eat. It is that there are too many of them that are eating anything.

And feeding them with imports from Mars would not solve the problem either because the total human ecological footprint on the earth is far, far greater than just what  is done to provide food. If there were more people, there would be more demand for electricity, fuel oil, highways, forest products, more urban sprawl, more pollution, more rivers damed, more nuclear reactors built, and a long list of other demands on the earth, "

I am still awaiting a reply.

Now, if someone is really concerned about how well people eat, and also about protecting the environment, I would expect that person to already, before even ever having heard of cloudbusting, to be active in the movement to reduce population, and in combating the evil, criminally insane religions that oppose doing anything to solve the population problem.

 If someone who has never tried to work on that issue says he wants to intervene in the functioning of the atmosphere to "help farmers" or "prevent famine", he is probably guilty of self-deception and I would suspect him of being more interested in power-tripping and the emotional satisfaction and feeling of power from being in control of the weather than in helping anyone. After all, if he has never tried to help solve a problem until he hears of cloudbusting, why should he suddenly want to solve it with a cloudbuster when he never was too concerned about it before?

Cloudbusting can and should be used to restore normal atmospheric functioning in cases where the atmosphere is not functioning naturally and needs help to recover. But cloudbusting is not a solution to the problem of too many people all wanting to eat and too much land being needed to feed tham all.

The cloudbuster is not a way to add the deserts of the world to the farms of the world. In places where deserts are the result of human activity, such as deforestation or over-grazing of livestock, simply increasing rainfall would not help much. The rain would soon stop again if the reason the landscape became a desert in the first place was human use, unless it was allowed to regain its' original vegetation cover and remain undisturbed as a natural ecosystem and not be ploughed up and cultivated as soon as possible. .

Cloudbuster-aided recovery of lands that have been deserts for ages due to some ancient catastrophe, could be done eventually, but it would take many years, possibly even centuries after the return of full atmosphericpulsation and normal weather, for the ecosystems of those lands to fully recover. Creating rain in a desert area without first removing the DOR barriers that obstruct approching weather fronts, and then ploughing the newly irrigated land, would be adding additional vandalism to the damage already done by desertification, and would delay recovery of the ecosystem by many more years if an attempt at real recovery was ever made at some later date.

Altering normal or seasonal weather in an ecosystem that is functioning well already, but not suitable for commercially valued crops, would be a willful destruction of a properly functioning ecosystem merely to change it into farmlands, useless for anything except growing food for an ever-growing human population that can never be satisfied.

So cloudbusting should not be thought of as a panacea to enable unrestrained population growth by irrigating deserts to turn them into farms. The cloudbuster is not just another method of irrigation. It is not a farm tool.

Properly speaking, the cloudbuster is a form of medical treatment, on a landscape scale. And it should be used in the spirit of a medical treatment, for the health of the patient, the earth. It is the only means by which an injured and dying ecosystem can be restored to health. And that is its' only legitimate purpose.

Underground Radio And Underground Cloudbusting

When I was a teenager, a kid in the neighborhood who was heavily into electronics, and who incidentally is now an electronics engineer for a local TV station, set up a full-scale radio broadcasting studio in his basement, using a home-made transmitter and a technique called "carrier current", capable of sending the signals over the city power transmission lines so it was impossible for the FCC to trace where the signal was coming from except as far as the nearest power line.

For that whole summer we broadcast programs that could be picked up on a regular AM radio all over town on a regular schedule while the FCC tried fruitlessly to find out who we were. We ran up what would have been a $2.5,000,000 fine if we had ever been caught, and only quit when we had to go back to school in the fall. We called ourselves, "Your Underground Radio Station. Which was appropriate since we were located in a basement.

Now, except for political revolutionary groups and resistence movements in occupied countries during wartime, I have never heard of any other illegal radio station with regularly scheduled programing. Most people just naturally take it for granted that a radio station must have a license to broadcast. Hardly anyone questions that. It is regarded as a fact of nature. And the need for a license is not just a matter of a government wantinmg to control and tax something. It really IS based on a fact of nature.

There is a limit to the amount of room available in the portion of the spectrum that can be used for broadcasting, so there must be a means to prevent too many stations from crowding the spectrum and interfering with each other. Requiring a license to operate and allowing only one license-holder to use each usable frequency is the only possible way to have any useable broadcasting at all.

Of course it was not always so. In the early days of radio, for the first few years after radio was invented, anyone was free to build and operate a broadcasting station at will with no regulation at all. But that changed in a few years when the spectrum began to get too crowded for that, and laws were passed to allocate parts of the spectrum to licensed operators so they would not block out each others' signals. Otherwise, since the radio spectrum is a resource of limited extent, the resulting chaos would render all radio impossible.

Cloudbusting is still in the stage of a free-for-all, with no controling agency to allocate cloudbusting priviliages to qualified operators and ensure that their operations are in the public interest. The difference is that radio was regulated within a few short years of its' inception, while cloudbusting has now been around for 60 years.

 It is reasonable to ask why this is so. Why has no body of laws been enacted to prevent the rather obvious harm to the public that unlicensed cloudbusting can cause?

Other new technologies, such as the airplane and the automobile, were licensed and regulated within a few years of their invention also. Most new technologies and inventions rather quickly are subjected to control by the authorities. Cloudbusting, like firearms, which existed for centuries before anyone thought to regulate them, seems to be among the very few exceptions.

That is going to have to change. And it is going to have to change soon. Already, countless lives have been lost due to the ignorance of inexperienced cloudbuster operators.

 In one single cloudbusting project in East Africa, more than 20,000 people died from diseases carried by large numbers of insects that bred in the puddles of standing water left all over the landscape in the wake of out-of-season rains brought by a "successful" cloudbusting operation to "green the desert" in a nearby country. If the same amount of rain had fallen at the right time of year, there would have been no such epidemic because migratory birds would have been there to eat the insects, but at the time of year when the birds were not there, epidemics resulted.

A short telephone consultation with an ecologist would have alerted the cloudbuster operator to the dangers, but I know of no instance of any cloudbuster operator ever bothering to consult an ecologist. And this despite there already being several laws on the books, in almost all countries, that would require such consultations for any project that could reasonably be expected to impact the environment.

At the present time, anyone, anywhere in the world, who feels like taking up cloudbusting can do so without regard for any environmental protection laws or the safety of the public. Although there are laws in several places that clearly require anyone intending to engage in weather modification to obtain a permit,  nobody has ever done so. And nobody has ever been prosecuted for disregarding these laws.

But a teen-ager caught using a home-made radio transmitter to broadcast home-made programing to people who want to listen to it would be subject to a huge fine, more than his expected lifetime earnings.

Just as there is a limited amount of broadcast band available to use for radio broadcasting, and a too-crowded spectrum would cause interference that would render all broadcasts useless, so there is a limit to the number of cloudbusters that can be used in a given area without interfering with each other and ruining the results. The effective range of a typical cloudbuster operation is up to several hundred kilometers, and long-range side-effects have been noted at much greater distances than that.

 Regulation will have to take into account the great range of cloudbuster operations and prevent compound or conflicting operations from accidentally disrupting, augmenting, or counter-acting  each other. That would require, among other things, that all proposed operations be made public in advance, probably on a specially dedicated website that anyone could access to see if any cloudbusting is planned for today, and if so, where it is being done and what the proposed operation is intended to accomplish.

In a very large country, such as the United States, Canada, Russia, China, or Australia, there might be room for several cloudbusters to operate without too much risk of overlaping effects. But in other places, such as Central Europe or the Balkans, there might be no room for more than one cloudbuster to serve several countries.

Co-ordinated operations by several cloudbusters working together might also be done. This would involve a much greater area, and therefore the co-operation of several governments unless an international regulatory body is formed. Again, the experience gained by the international agreements that regulate international activities such as aviation, shipping, and radio broadcasting will point the way to international co-operation in the field.

Any effective regulation will require some means of detecting covert operations. A cloudbuster is too cheap and too simple to build for the safety of the public to depend on nobody happening to attempt an illegal operation. An investigation agency of some sort will be needed to track down cases of suspected cloudbusting and gather evidence needed to successfully prosecute the case.

Unlike radio broadcasting, an operating cloudbuster does not put out any signal that can be detected and traced. But the behavior of the atmosphere is sometimes a clue to if there has been a cloudbuster at work or not. From watching the weather maps it is often possible to note anomolies that indicate cloudbusting. The methods of observation and deduction that have been pioneered by a few workers in the field can be developed into a new branch of orgonomic science: Forensic Orgonomy, the art and science of detecting cloudbusters at work.

Cloudbusting must be used responsibly, and only by people who understand both the science behind it and the biological environment upon which the cloudbuster exercises its' effects. And without that condition being met, it is among the very worst dangers threatening the earth.

Now It's Official

USGS Proof That Fracking Causes Earthquakes

"Earth's crust is pervasively fractured at depth by faults. These faults can sustain high stresses without slipping because natural "tectonic" stress and the weight of the overlying rock pushes the opposing fault blocks together, increasing the frictional resistance to fault slip. The injected water counteracts the frictional forces on faults and, in effect, "pries them apart", thereby facilitating earthquake slip."

In 1994, there was a big earthquake in California. 

1994 Northridge earthquake - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The earthquake happened after an all-night drawing operation with  a cloudbuster by a group calling itself the C.OR.E. Network, headed by Dr. James DeMeo. The cloudbuster, one of several mounted on trucks for mobility, and traveling all up and down the West Coast, had been grounded into a well which connected to the underground water table. 

A cloudbuster draws orgone energy from the point in the sky it is aimed at into the water it is grounded into. And orgone energy in high concentrations, makes water expand. The water was already under high pressure and the expansion shattered the billions of tiny cells in the porous rock. Resulting slipage and vibrations are what triggered the earthquake. 

Now, this conclusion by the U.S. Geological Survey concludes that is possible, just as I have said all along. This strongly supports my analysis of the event and adds substancial weight to the possibility that Dr. DeMeo and his associates are guilty of :

"The death toll came to a total of 57 people, and there were over 8,700 injured. In addition, the earthquake caused an estimated $20 billion in damage, making it one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history."

Social Unrest Caused By Cloudbusting

In his book on the Bioelectrical Experiments On Sexuality and Anxiety, Wilhelm Reich described the biophysics of emotion, concluding, on the basis of his series of experiments, that the objective movement of charges in the body is what we subjectively feel as emotion. Movement of charge toward the periphery of the body is felt as well-being and a sense of all being well with the world, while contraction toward the interior of the body is felt as anxiety. 

The energetic functioning of the atmosphere is fundamentally the same as in the living body. In both, there is a constant pulsation, with charge moving between the poles of expansion and contraction. When the atmosphere is in the expansion phase of the cycle, there is bright, clear, sunny weather. When it contracts, there will be rain. The stronger and longer-lasting the contraction, the more severe the storm. 

When there is a strong and long-lasting expansion tendency in the atmosphere, there is a drought. A strong contraction will produce heavy, long-lasting rain. In a drought condition, the cloudbuster can be used to contract the atmosphere to produce rain. This is a standard operation, well-documented and well-known in the field. 

Less well known is that anything a cloudbuster does to the atmosphere, it also is doing to the biosphere. All living organisms within range of an operating cloudbuster are affected  directly, in their energetic functioning, by the cloudbuster, in the same way as the energetic functioning of the atmosphere is affected. And that range can be quite extensive at time, up to hundreds of kilometers, depending on the weather conditions. 

This is shown experimentally by the fact that two electrodes driven into the living bark of a tree have an electrical potential difference between them that shows instant changes when a cloudbuster starts to operate, even at a distance of hundreds of kilometers. The living system of the tree reacts to the change in the energetic continuum, and there is no reason to expect the systems of animal life-forms to not do the same. 

This is borne out by the feeling of " brooding", tension, anxiety, and impending doom that is felt before the beginning of a strong storm, such as a hurricane or violent thunderstorm. The emotional sensations are the subjective perception of objective physical changes in bioelectrical potentials in the body in response to the changes in the atmosphere. 

And the change in the atmosphere that happens just before a big storm is that the atmosphere contracts. It is a contraction that is the condition needed to produce rain. And that same contraction that causes rain to fall, when it induces a contraction of the biosystem,  produces that vague, non-specific feeling of tension, anxiety, and impending doom.

Now, a cloudbuster aimed straight upward will cause the atmosphere to contract. That contraction will extend in a rough circle surrounding the site of the cloudbuster for a distance that will gradually increase with the duration of the drawing operation. Depending on the length of time the draw is continued, the circle of contracted atmosphere can grow until it extends up to hundreds of kilometers across. 

Then rain will begin to fall. That is, it will if the draw is continued long enough and there is not too much DOR around for rain to form. If there is too much DOR, it may not be possible to cause rain to form even with a prolonged  vertical draw. But even if there is too much DOR around to obtain rain, there will still be a contraction produced by a long vertical draw with a cloudbuster. And even if no rain results, that contraction can still have a bioenergetic effect on living organisms within the contracted circle. 

And in the case of humans, that contraction of their systems will cause a brooding feeling of tension, anxiety, restlessness, and impending doom. Not all people will react the same way, of course, or to the same degree, but in general, on average, emotions of the sort related to tension will tend to predominate among the population of the area encompassed by the circle of contraction surrounding the cloudbuster. 

There is a group based in Germany working at an oasis in Algeria with a cloudbuster. They are trying to "improve" the weather there for agricultural purposes, for an agricultural settlement of about 800 inhabitants. After I had published a series of criticisms of their operation, many of which had unwanted side-effects on either the local ecology or on distant places, they changed their method of operation to comply with what they thought were my recommendations. However, they did not tell me about this, nor did they ask me for my advice. 

They started doing only vertical draws, hoping that in this way they could avoid the lateral, point-to-point motion of air masses across the surface of the earth which I had warned them was causing the previous problem of side-effects in distant places. I do not know for how long they continued doing these operations, but the approximate time of year they started can be determined. It coincides neatly with the start of the uprisings of civil unrest in North Africa which became known as the "Arab Spring".

Did the social unrest and civil strife that engulfed the region have an origin in a contraction of the atmosphere caused by a cloudbuster? Did those highly emotional upheavals by previouly placid populations stem from a miscalculation by a group who had no idea that their cloudbusting operations could do anything else besides bring rain? 

I consider it very likely. And as more and more people all over the world take up cloudbusting, we can look forward to other such outbreaks of mass unrest fed by atmospheric tension in the future. 

Guest Article By Petros Evdokas And My Response

February Observations in the Atmosphere


The month of February 2012 in Cyprus, our small island country in the
Eastern Mediterranean, proved to be very fruitful and beneficent from a
conventional point of view and fascinating from the Orgonomic point of view.

I grew up in the nineteen sixties. During those years of my childhood I
learned a lot about the weather from our elders; society was still
closely knit at the time, and there was a lot of knowledge that was
"collectively owned" by the community (the knowledge existed "in the
public domain" we would say today). It was passed along among people and
specifically from one generation to the next. There were several
overlapping cycles that included direct observation of nature, direct
exchanges among people, learning, teaching, interacting and circulating
feedback and direct experiencing that confirmed and sustained this
knowledge. It was unmediated - there were no Corporate or State media to
distort or shape this body of knowledge during that period.

During my childhood years there were a few incidents of dust that
appeared in the atmosphere in Spring, stuck to humidity and forming a
dense kind of fog. It would last between a half day and two days, at the
most. The elders said that it was a natural phenomenon that occurred
once or twice every three to five years. And indeed, that's how frequent
it was.

The elders also said that *their* elders had passed along the knowledge
that this dust was suspected to come from the Sahara, but that "only God
knows, really" the source of this weird thing. Within one generation,
through the expansion of regional and global meteorological knowledge,
airplane observations and satellite photography, this suspicion of the
elders was confirmed.

This rare appearance of Saharan dust used to clear up completely either
by subtle winds or light rain; sometimes - very rarely - it triggered a
heavy rain that washed out the atmosphere. Sometimes, and I remember
this vividly, the dust was rusty and the rain was a horrific blood red
that ran along the streets in rivers. It looked like violent rivers of
blood. Biblical associations with the Plagues of the Pharaoh were
inevitable.

Always after this kind of atmospheric response to the dust, a bright dry
blue clear sky would ensue, and the joyous feeling of Spring would
return to animals and people.

As I grew up, this phenomenon changed. There was nothing in the stories
of the elders to match it. The dust  started coming later in the year,
during the transition from cold to hot weather. Sometimes it would
appear in late Spring, and even in the Summer. Atmospheric response was
more violent, with fast winds and occasional thunder and lightning
storms bringing torrential rains.

The duration of the effect became longer as well. It extended from to
two to four days sometimes.

In the decade of the nineties and then in the first decade of the new
century, things got worse. The dust would come more frequently and be
suspended in the air for a longer time, and atmospheric response would
vary from nothing to mild to inefficiently weak. Dust would appear every
two to three years at first, then every year, and then several times
every year, usually toward the transition from cold to hot humid weather.

It would stick to the already polluted city air and to the humid air,
unmoving, block the Sun, choke up the air and cause stagnated breathing
to all living beings. Plants, animals and people got sick, and the
duration of the event might last up to a week; sometimes ten days.
Slight winds might clear it a little, but the sky would not clear well;
there would always remain a leftover dullness to the atmosphere, a
diffuse haze that rarely left. In this last decade, even if a rare rain
would erupt in association with the dust, it was not enough to clear up
the sky and the stagnation would resume within one or two days.

A large number of factors may have contributed to reducing the local
atmosphere's ability to self-regulate, and these are local, regional and
global:
o-     Polluted air in the cities from cars and in the countryside from
irresponsible agricultural practices and open surface mining of the
earth; the stationing of nuclear weapons on the island; extensive
deforestation due to war (burning down of forests and failure to restore
them) plus "development" that has reduced cultivated lands and increased
built up areas extensively; the construction of several large dams
creating stagnant Orgone and air zones above and to their east; expanded
pollution in Europe and some in Northern Africa; and the global climate
change that has affected everything.

o-     I would add some factors that I'm not sure of, like the long term
cloudbusting project we've learned of that took place in Algeria by
well-intentioned but probably misguided volunteers there, which must
have set up a blockage to the southeastern natural flow of Orgone toward
Cyprus, somehow contributing to larger amounts of dust to come our way,
but lessening the atmospheric Orgone flow that enabled our skies to be
self-regulating in the past.

o-     Also, the extensive US bombing of Iraq with radioactive uranium
weapons, in addition to ruining the local natural and human environment
and causing confirmed multiplication of cancers and respiratory illness
in Iraq, has set up a blockage of the natural stream atmospheric Orgone
and air in the area. I don't know the extent to which this might be
causing a backed up accumulation to the West of it, where Cyprus is
located.


By the years 2006 and onwards, increased numbers of people were
reportedly dying of heart attacks, asthma and other respiratory distress
related illnesses, both at home and work and in the hospitals during the
Saharan dust incidents. Cortisone and bronchio-dilator inhalants became
the new medical fad, and a whole new generation of children became
diagnosed with chronic bronchiolitis, bronchitis and asthma, and lived
almost year-round on these deadly medicines.

In the Summer of year 2010, during a stagnated Saharan dust incident
that lasted about ten days a group of us did an atmospheric intervention
for a few hours that brought a very light rain and atmospheric relief
that lasted all season.

In the year 2011 we witnessed a few dust incidents, but less in number,
and less severe in persistence than in previous years.

November of 2011 was a phenomenal month. Almost during the entire month
we had bright sunny clear skies with a delicious Orgone blue reigning
over good moods in all, light breezes... and a delayed Winter.

While the quality of the sky in November was very reminiscent of the
clarity and lightness of my childhood year, signaling a return to
natural processes, the delayed Winter was not so natural. Winter was
delayed in all of Europe, causing a lot of environmental damage,
including deaths of hibernating bears and reptiles due to food shortages
and other effects on crops, vegetation, insects, etc.

Finally Winter came... with a vengeance. It's been one of the worst
Winters in our history. Many hundreds of people died in Europe and
Western Asia from cold and other weather-related factors. In Cyprus,
this Winter was one of our coldest ever, and on the last day of February
it snowed for hours in Lefkosia~Nicosia, the capital - an unheard of
phenomenon.

During February there were four incidents of Saharan dust. What is
remarkable about them is the swiftness and efficiency of the local
atmosphere's response. Two of the incidents were cleared up within half
a day with light wind and light rain. Another one lasted a whole day,
and was cleared up by a rainstorm. A fourth one lasted two days, during
which there was constant reaction by the atmosphere from the beginning
of the event and succeeded in clearing it with winds, rain, and a
lightning storm.

I marveled at our atmosphere's ability to react so healthily, quickly,
efficiently!

Trying to understand this glorious resurgence of a self-regulating
atmosphere in Cyprus, I'm stuck with either not enough explanations, or
with too much theorizing that may be unfounded. Nevertheless, I feel
it's useful to explore these ideas.

I don't think that the small intervention we did in 2010 is enough to
account for this atmospheric restoration. I'm aware of course that
cloudbusting has influences over large distances both in space and time,
but I can't see that particular action as being so powerful; it was
mild, short, and the effects that I could measure may have lasted only
for a few months, perhaps a year at a maximum. (Unless there are other
parameters that I'm not aware of.)

One factor that I think needs to be taken into consideration is that the
atmosphere is reacting on a global scale, and we don't usually think of
this as an active factor. Often in meteorology and in medicine cause and
effect are mixed up, misunderstood, or to put it differently,
conventional science (or linear, armoured thinking) has a hard time
separating them. For example, a fever is an organism's natural response
to an illness, but conventional medicine sees it as a primary part of
the illness. Same as in weather science: more violent storms, more
intense winters, are healthy atmospheric responses to an environmental
illness. Even global warming itself might be seen that way; it's a
natural response to unnatural conditions, or to shifted balances.

We're in a period of activated global atmospheric reactions to various
offences (radioactive and chemical pollution; large scale deforestation;
poisoning of the seas; environmental catastrophes of many levels and
types). To whatever degree the atmosphere is successful in restoring
balance on a global scale, we see some of that ability to
self-regulation trickling down to regional and local levels. I think
that our local atmosphere in Cyprus may have benefitted from this global
atmospheric response.

The most energetic responses seen in our region in recent years are the
European harsh Winters that seem to be intensifying each year. One
factor that I think is mostly ignored, that may have triggered
atmospheric responses in Europe is the US/NATO bombing of Yugoslavia
with radioactive uranium weapons during two wars in the nineteen
nineties that have poisoned the river Danube, surface and underground
waters, air, plant and animal life in all the Balkans. Atmospheric
reaction to this widespread radiation inevitably triggers the formation
of Deadly Orgone (DOR) and subsequent violent atmospheric responses in
nature - all this was shown in various carefully designed experiments
both in the lab and in the field by Wilhelm Reich. It would be gross
negligence for Orgonomists to ignore these events as being part of the
last few decades' weather and climate shifts.

These same factors have been at work in Iraq, the Balkans, and New
Mexico (where the radioactive uranium weapons were first tested out in
open spaces). And also during the emergencies triggered by the
radioactive accidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Also, we've been informed (though not adequately), that the cloudbusting
in Algeria has recently been changed to a (perhaps permanent?) vertical
draw, which probably has less regional impact, freeing up the flow of
Orgone toward Cyprus, enabling better responses to the dust from the Sahara.

Other factors are the increased temperature differences, which enable
more violent meteorological events, which in turn release more energy
that's trapped in previously stagnant conditions. These releases come in
the form of thunder and lightning, intense rain, hail, violent winds.

And there may be factors we do not know, and may never come to know. For
example, I'm aware that Mossad, the Israeli covert intelligence
operations agency, has been involved for decades in cloudbusting
operations. But I don't know the extent to which they may be engaged in
regional, local or even global operations that affect our weather here.
And probably we'll never find out. Also, we don't know if their
operations are guided by any genuine knowledge of Orgonomy (which I
doubt), or if they are shaped by the same crude, callous and barbaric
way in which they treat the Palestinian people as part of their
genocidal ethnic cleansing operations, aimed in this case at subjugation
and enslavement of the atmosphere.

To all this, controversial enough as the Orgonomic point of view is
already, I must add another controversial element. It's that of mass
psychology. Within Orgonomy we usually accept the observation that a
stagnant atmosphere often corresponds to a psychologically or culturally
stagnant population. Usually we see this in the sense of cause and
effect; we say that a sick atmosphere creates a sick population.

But we don't often think of the reverse, i.e. of the effect that an
awakened, activated, joyous and energized population may have on the
atmosphere. In Old World history and in Native American oral traditions,
we find descriptions of events where large numbers of people congregated
in passionate states, or in states of altered consciousness or in
ecstatic states, have triggered dramatic changes in weather (I have
witnessed some of those events myself). Same as with events of large
scale slaughters, battles, or incidents with intense impact on mass
psychology: the history and the traditional lore of most of the world's
peoples record that such events sometimes have effects on the weather.

Along that line of thinking I must point out that in the year 2011 we
witnessed large mobilizations of the public in three large areas: in the
Middle East with what became known as the Arab Spring; in Europe, with
the movement of the Enraged; and in the US, with the Occupy movement.
I'm aware that images of the uprisings conveyed through the media are
mostly those of violent strife, anger and conflict (after all, the media
will utilize sensationalist images to further its own agenda for profits
and propaganda), but the truth of all these mobilizations is a lot more
joy, awareness, expanded consciousness, togetherness, solidarity,
bonding, and tangible love than we find anywhere within conventional
society's everyday events of business-as-usual.

For example the outbreak of Feminism and of more empowered roles for
women that colourised the mobilizations in Egypt, or the Direct
Democracy formations that developed in the streets and plazas of Europe
show that there's an active component of spontaneous Work Democracy, of
Orgonomic restoration taking place or erupting from below in these
societies and finding fertile soil in the community at large. This
fertile soil is a newly rediscovered sense of community, a new
appreciation for human bonds, an awareness of how precious the human and
natural environment is.

We had our own version of these mass mobilization events in Cyprus as
well, which combined some elements of all the movements mentioned above.
They were the largest spontaneous mobilizations in about a hundred
years. We may not have succeeded in creating paradise on earth, but it's
true that our mobilizations over the Summer of 2011 brought out into the
streets more communal solidarity, more passion for our fellow human
beings, more a sense of community bonding, volunteer spirit, compassion,
awareness, joy, humour, a population electrified to being more alive and
awakened than in many decades...  and all of this may also be impacting
the atmosphere's responsiveness.


All in all, there's no visible guarantee that the atmospheric
self-regulation we witnessed restored in Cyprus this February will
continue. Especially as the weather shifts toward the warm and hot
seasons, we might discover new obstacles, or that the impact of some
environmental distortions has never subsided.

But for now, the prospects look good.

Wishing bright deep blue Orgone skies to all,
Petros Evdokas, petros@cyprus-org.net

March, 2012
~~~~~~~~~~~


And My Response:


 Thank you, Petros, for a very helpful contribution. I think you brought out several very important points and your descriptions of the atmosphere are very insightful.

I have a few reservations about two of the things you said. For one thing, I doubt the Mosad has done any cloudbusting. I once asked the late Rafi Rosen, who did a very good cloudbusting project at a kibutz called Hasoelim, in the north of Israel in the early 1960s, if he had heard of them doing any cloudbusting. He said nobody had ever asked him about it, and since he was an Israeli reserve army officer, they would have no reason not to trust him and would reasonably have been expected to consult him for his experience in the field.

 I also spoke to Gad Assaf, a meteorologist at the Weisman Institute, the Israeli government research organization, who had observed Rafis' operations and wrote a favorable report urging the Weisman Institute to fund further research on it. They did not do so. Dr. Assaf seemed quite discouraged and bitter that his superiors had ignored his advice. He has since left Israel and was living in the United States the last I heard. 

Two of the former Kibutz members who had worked with Rafi, Joe Liebner and Joey Richter, also told me they had never been able to get the Israeli government to take an interest in cloudbusting. So if the Mosad was interested in cloudbusting, they were ignoring the most knowledgable and experienced people they had available to study it. That does not seem likely. 

I also asked Victor Obstrovsky, the former Mosad agent who wrote a book exposing a lot of their dirty tricks if he knew of them doing any weather-modification experiments. He said he had never heard of anything like that in his years in the Mosad. As the author of a book exposing stuff the Mosad wanted to cover up, and that the Israeli government tried to have banned, he is not likely to be covering up for them. 

The late Jerome Greenfield, who wrote a biographical book on Reich and his legal case, also had not heard from his contacts in Israel of any interest in cloudbusting. Greenfield was a genuine Zionist terrorist, having been a member of the group that blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in the 1948 fighting, killing more than 100 British Army officers, so his contacts in the Mosad would probably have been very good.

All in all, I have never seen any convincing evidence of serious interest in cloudbusting by any agency of any government. Such rumors circulate about the US government and the Russian government too, but there is nothing to them as far as any solid evidence goes. 

I know Jim DeMeo did cloudbusting in Israel in the early 1990s, and that was funded by Philadelphia real estate billionaire Richard Fox, one of the most active hard-core right-wing lobbyists for Israel in the US, but I suspect he was more attracted to DeMeos' anti-Islamic politics than interested in cloudbusting. 

The operation was a disaster, causing an extreme cold wave as far south as Kartoum, and that was then carried on the west-to-east flow of the atmosphere all the way to India. DeMeo was getting help from orgonomists in Greece and Germany to draw down cold air from the Baltic across Europe to the eastern Mediterranian. 

By the way, you left out one more large-scale nuclear disaster: the 1958 explosion at a Soviet nuclear site in the Urals. That one was actually bigger than Chernobyl, but the USSR was able to cover it up at the time.

The report you mention of the people in Algeria doing a prolonged vertical draw was based on an e-mail to me from Harold Kautz-Vella, the public relations officer for the Algerian Desert-Greening Project. I do not know any more about it than that.  I explained in my post to this list how I think a prolonged vertical draw might have been a contributing factor in the socio-political tensions that broke forth in several North African countries in a short time following the change in cloudbusting procedures in Algeria.

 However, I have not seen any reason to think sociopolitical emotions would influence weather. It is more likely to be the other way around: that the emotions of large numbers of people are affected by atmospheric conditions. Any effect on weather of such a small input as bioenergetic effects from human emotions would be too small-scale to matter, though it is certainly theoretically possible for such an effect to exist and if shown to exist, could be fully explained by bioenergetic field effects, without recourse to any mysticism or alleged "mental" phenomena. In any case, I would like to see convincing evidence before forming any conclusions.

In America, this past year, the weather has been unusual too. A long drought in the southwest was probably caused initially by the intensification of the long-standing blockage in the southwest by the general weakening and stagnation caused by Fukashima, then followed and prolonged by someone trying to divert hurricanes away from the Carribean and the Gulf Coast. Those hurricanes are the normal annual means by which the atmosphere is cleansed of DOR far inland, and without them, the stream of energy bearing the summer monsoon from the southwest has a hard time fighting it's way into and past Arizona. 

In the absence of the normal annual cleansing hurricanes, tornadoes formed as a reaction to the high level of DOR, and there were a lot more of them than usual, and they happened far outside their normal range.

 That is happening again this past week, as the continuing high levels of DOR irritate the atmosphere into discharging via a strong circulatory motion, complicated by another factor: I suspect  someone in Arizona is using a cloudbuster to move the jet stream off-course, adding added energy to the already over-charged system and making it more prone to sudden strong discharges in the form of tornadoes. 

Both hurricanes and tornadoes should be looked at as beneficial, the healthy response of the atmosphere to an irritant, a healing process the atmosphere needs to go through. Anyone attempting to vandalize these vital processes, regardless of how they might rationalize their actions, should be regarded as attacking the earth and attempting to murder it. 

Suspected Cloudbuster In Australia

ANOTHER reason to object to indiscriminate weather modification attempts: Nobody can know how many OTHER people in the same area are ALSO trying to do the same thing. With an unknown number of operators unknown to each other all working in the same area at the same time, the results would be chaos even if all of them were capable and well-qualified.

I do not know how many cloudbusters are operational in Australia at this time, but given the availability on the internet of descriptions of how to make a cloudbuster, there must be quite a few.

In addition to the warnings of potential dangers, it might interest at least some of the people who are operating or thinking of operating, to know that in Australia, weather modification is considered to be prohibited by environmental protection laws unless a specific act of the legislature is passed exempting a particular project. Such exemptions have been passed, but only for government agencies, not for any private-sector projects such as exist in America, where commercial cloudseeders have tended to dominate the field.

These laws were passed with cloudseeding in mind, but they do not say they only apply to cloudseeding; they are worded to apply to any method of weatrher modification. So cloudbusting is illegal in Australia. There is no risk of prosecution at this time, since the effectiveness of the cloudbuster is still in dispute, but if it should ever become officially recognized, operators would then be subject to prosecution. And there is no statute of limitations on homicide cases.

Colors In The Sky

The colors of a cloud are due to the degree of excitation of the orgone energy in the cloud. They can be used to give an aproximate idea of how excited the energetic continuum is and from that it can be estimated if it is being excited artificially or not.

Bill Moise, Eva Reich's husband, was an artist. Reich said he was the best cloudbuster operator because he was accustomed to noticing slight variations in coloring and light intensity in the sky that most people would neglect.

Artists, along with animal trainers, gardeners, and kindergarden teachers, make the best cloudbuster operators. Engineers and physicists make the worst.